Cavs get: Deni Avdija, Toumani Camara and Jerami Grant
Blazers get: Donovan Mitchell
Why?
Cavs do it to add wings with size. Mobley needs to be our primary offensive player.
Blazers add a superstar for a reasonable price.
Cavs and Blazers
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, BullyKing, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Cavs and Blazers
-
JJ_PR
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,312
- And1: 4,053
- Joined: Mar 19, 2015
- Location: Puerto Rico
-
Re: Cavs and Blazers
-
Norm2953
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,500
- And1: 2,235
- Joined: May 17, 2003
- Location: Oregon
Re: Cavs and Blazers
Unlikely Portland would care to empty out their front court
Re: Cavs and Blazers
-
JRoy
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,073
- And1: 14,448
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Cavs and Blazers
Pass for POR.
Mitchell is a fine player but this is not the right move
Mitchell is a fine player but this is not the right move
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Cavs and Blazers
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,576
- And1: 36,525
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cavs and Blazers
The Cavs aren't breaking up the core this summer. If they have another disappointing postseason, big changes will come next summer.
Also, as much as I like Mobley, he isn't presently a No. 1 option on offense.
Also, as much as I like Mobley, he isn't presently a No. 1 option on offense.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cavs and Blazers
-
Malapropism
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,335
- And1: 1,531
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
-
Re: Cavs and Blazers
Don't think either team wants to do this.
Re: Cavs and Blazers
-
Myth
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,884
- And1: 10,570
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Cavs and Blazers
This makes no sense for Portland in terms of roster construction. I can’t fathom what our starting lineup is even supposed to be after this. Arguably our 5 best players would all be guards and any true forwards on the team are 3rd stringers and 2-way contract players. Any attempt to trade for Mitchell would be to pair him with our defensive forwards.
Re: Cavs and Blazers
-
One_and_Done
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,856
- And1: 5,819
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: Cavs and Blazers
Given where Portland is in their rebuild it doesn't make much sense for them.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: Cavs and Blazers
-
toooskies
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,288
- And1: 2,596
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: Cavs and Blazers
Cleveland has no business trading an All-NBA player for lesser pieces. Especially while offering a "reasonable price".
Portland has no business trading for an All-NBA player with young pieces. Their roster doesn't fit Mitchell's timeline.
Portland has no business trading for an All-NBA player with young pieces. Their roster doesn't fit Mitchell's timeline.
Return to Trades and Transactions