Old_Blue wrote:azwfan wrote:Old_Blue wrote:
Bingo. Nobody else has a legal obligation to mitigate on behalf of Kuminga. Once he rejected the 5 year /$150 million offer, the Dubs weren't obligated to re-offer those same terms or anywhere near those terms. If he wants to bring suit against his own agent, then I'd say "Good luck with that." That's a losing he said / she said story that would only result in Kuminga being deemed a toxic asset by every other agent. He's dug himself a pit. The Nets were the only cavalry that could have come to Kuminga's rescue. And, they seem indifferent to his plight. The smartest move at this point is to accept the qualifying offer, play hard, pray he doesn't get hurt and become an unrestricted free agent next summer.
I doubt Kerr plays him at all if he accepts the QO. Kerr may get organizational pressure to play him if he signs a trade-able contract.
If the club wanted serious issues with the players' union, then not playing Kuminga at all after he accepted the QO would be a very good way to go about it. If he signs the QO, you treat him fairly, hope that he redeems some of his value and be done with it. Nastiness need not be part of the equation.
Yeah, sounds good, but, Kerr already didnt play him for a period of time and Keer already said the reason was that “hes trying to win games”. Nd i believe the quote was, “if he comes back on a large contract, of course we wjll try to make it work” - but what if he doesnt. Better said, “why would Kuminga think Kerr would play him with no organizational oressure to do so. I mean Kerr barely played him WITH organizational pressure.