HornetJail wrote:vexco wrote:HornetJail wrote:gotta agree with most of that, we very easily could've made a run at the playoffs this summer with like one acquisition, but the FO just chose to set the rebuild back multiple years with that Mark trade. Not a fan.
But .... it is kind of odd to pretend the Hornets are between timelines when the headliner of the "first" timeline is just one year older than the headliner of the younger timeline.
Melo is 23 going on 24
Miller is 22, 23 soon after the start of the season
Kon is 20
are really the only players we REALLY need to care about long term.
the elder statesmen of our rotation are Sexton (26) and Miles (27) and even if they were core level pieces, I wouldn't consider them out of our timeline.
Save the "two timelines" talk for the Warriors of a couple years ago when they were trying to fit their core of Steph/Klay/Draymond with rookies 12-15 years younger than them.
I just don't see how trading Mark set anything back, honestly. Are people just looking at the stats and age and thinking he was something special?
are people pretending that 0 games of quality center play is somehow better than 40-50?
I just don't think he gave us even 10 games of quality center play. Slow and a turnstile on defense for a player who was supposed to be a "mobile" big coming out of college.
















