LakerLegend wrote:Iwasawitness wrote:LakerLegend wrote:Lol, what exactly makes you an authority on the subject.
He's smart enough to know that LeBron was more athletic at age 20 than 35
You've spent the last 24 hours monitoring this thread to come in and scream at anyone who disagrees with you and call them idiots.
The only thing you've done is refuse to consider anything contrary to the narrative you've built in your mind about LeBron, not sure why you think you're the judge of who's intelligent and who's not.
And the only thing you've done is give me any and every reason to truly believe LeBron isn't on roids, because whether it's you or anyone else making the claim, the arguments are all the same: based on an incredibly false premise. I've asked you to provide me proof, you give none. I asked you to give photos of athletes for comparison sake, you make excuses not to do them. I ask you to give me something substantial, instead you make what I can confidently say is one of the most laughable statements ever made on this site.
You are full of ****. You want to sit here and pretend like I'm the biased one, like I'm the one who isn't pulling his weight in regards to my defense of LeBron. I've got news for you: I don't have anything to prove here, because I don't need to. LeBron has never been caught with roids, because he's never taken them. I am not asking for too much when I say "hey, if you're going to say it like it's an absolute fact and I'm an idiot for thinking otherwise, THEN PROVE IT!". You are the biased one here, not me. You are dead set on something being the case even though you have yet to actually have any sort of evidence to back it up. I am simply siding with the party that makes the most sense here.
Not my fault if you don't like looking at these things from a logical point of view.