I suck defensively, but I rock offensively.

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
fallguy wrote:Hal14 wrote:fallguy wrote:
If the premise of your argument is that AS is a good defender, I say you're wrong. As does basically everyone in the league.
I didn't say that he is a good defender. You're arguing a point I didn't make.
Fair enough. That said, I do feel like you're trying to talk everyone else into a player by minimizing his legitimate flaws. I don't think it matters either way as there's about a 1% chance this guy is on our roster a year from now. But he sucks defensively.
Fierce1 wrote:Simon says...
I suck defensively, but I rock offensively.
jfs1000d wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Simon says...
I suck defensively, but I rock offensively.
And Simmons is the exact opposite. Put them on the floor.
Angel/Devil
Hot/Cold
Ting/Yang
Pasta/Antipasta
Simons/Simmons
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
darrendaye wrote:snowman wrote:Hal14 wrote:That would put us back over the 2nd apron though.
We're currently at 14 guys on standard contracts, 3 2-ways. And we're under 2nd apron.
I expect it to stay this way..unless there's a trade of someone like Simons/Niang/Hauser but unless that happens, I wouldn't think anyone else gets signed - other than a couple more exhibit 10 guys to round out the training camp roster.
At the 5 we have Queta, Garza, Tillman, Williams. And Niang can play some small ball 5..that's enough bodies. It's obviously not a great C rotation but it's a bridge year so doesn't matter that much..
I think we should move Tillman and sign Bassy. Tillman hasn't shown that much since we signed him.
I'm going to likely sound ridiculous saying this, but, I'm in favor of keeping a spot open in case Hayden Gray happens to have a strong shooting performance in the G-league and leaves a clean route to promote one of the 2-ways and sign Gray to keep him away from buzzards.
fallguy wrote:
return2glory wrote:fallguy wrote:
What are they talking about? signed nobody proven? Simons is a proven 20 point a game scorer. Also, going into this season, Boston wasn't trying to sign anyone really good. Their goal was to shed salary and we, that follow the Celtics knew Jrue and KP were gone. We also knew there was a good chance Kornet and Al there gone. So why are these pessimists talking about there will be no optimism?
This team should be around a .500 team this year. Maybe a little better, maybe a little worse depending on if they want to "rest" Brown and White a lot of games for a soft tank.
What team can lose a top 5-10 player in the league and still be dominant? None. That's what happened when Tatum wasn't going to be available this coming season. So where is the surprise?
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
Fierce1 wrote:No case for optimism?
If Cs declare Tatum will be out for the 2026 season then I would agree.
But the Cs could have an average regular season and a great playoffs.
Not saying it's guaranteed, but as long as the door is open for a Tatum return in March then I wouldn't rule anything out.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
cl2117 wrote:Fierce1 wrote:No case for optimism?
If Cs declare Tatum will be out for the 2026 season then I would agree.
But the Cs could have an average regular season and a great playoffs.
Not saying it's guaranteed, but as long as the door is open for a Tatum return in March then I wouldn't rule anything out.
Optimism for what? To win anything signficant next year? There really shouldn't be any based on the current roster, even if Tatum were to come back.
We've got one of the worst frontcourts in the league. Outside of Brown/Hauser we've got a ton of wings with upside but who will go through more than their fair share of growing pains. Our backcourt is solid with White/PP/Simons but has serious defensive concerns outside of Derrick.
We're set up to have a below average regular season and, hopefully, miss the playoffs entirely. I don't see where the optimism is. Not saying it's doom and gloom either. Got some interesting pieces to develop via the draft, FA and what's already on the roster but even with how weak the East is we should be bottom feeders.
That can change if Brad makes moves in season, but right now we are a play-in team at best.
klemen44 wrote:We should all be optimistic because Boston just needs two things:
A) one trade for good C (does not have to be a great one, a good solid one)
Can be easily done with:
- porzingis tpe or
- simmons expiring trade
- all 1st available for trade
B) Tatum back
Caould all happen in feb/march... If not bext summer
Celts17Pride wrote:Some people still don't get it. More moves are coming. Celtics payroll is going to continue to decrease. Could be a trade in the next month but the key date is Sep 7th when Simons and Niang can be combined with other players in a trade. Opening night roster is going to look very different than the July 25th roster.