Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,046
- And1: 8,932
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
Someone refresh me on the numbers…
If Kuminga signs for 20M AAV how much do we need to send out?
If Kuminga signs for 20M AAV how much do we need to send out?
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,272
- And1: 3,672
- Joined: May 27, 2003
- Location: Chicago
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
Chi town wrote:Someone refresh me on the numbers…
If Kuminga signs for 20M AAV how much do we need to send out?
Doug posted something on this yesterday. If I understand it correctly, Kuminga at $20M will count as $10M to GS. For teams below the apron, for contracts that "count" as being between $7,250,001 and $29 million, you just have to be within $7.5M of the matching salary. So, if Kuminga "counts" as $10 million for GS due to the BYC rule, then anything basically between $2.5M and $17.5M would do it.
https://www.sportsbusinessclassroom.com/understanding-trade-matching-in-the-new-collective-bargaining-agreement/
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,046
- And1: 8,932
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
jnrjr79 wrote:Chi town wrote:Someone refresh me on the numbers…
If Kuminga signs for 20M AAV how much do we need to send out?
Doug posted something on this yesterday. If I understand it correctly, Kuminga at $20M will count as $10M to GS. For teams below the apron, for contracts that "count" as being between $7,250,001 and $29 million, you just have to be within $7.5M of the matching salary. So, if Kuminga "counts" as $10 million for GS due to the BYC rule, then anything basically between $2.5M and $17.5M would do it.
https://www.sportsbusinessclassroom.com/understanding-trade-matching-in-the-new-collective-bargaining-agreement/
K. That means Pat is completely out of the question.
Wonder if Bulls could be a 3 way where Kuminga gets somewhere else and Dubs get Ayo but we get a better fit… cuz we know AK won’t accept a pick.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,272
- And1: 3,672
- Joined: May 27, 2003
- Location: Chicago
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
Chi town wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:Chi town wrote:Someone refresh me on the numbers…
If Kuminga signs for 20M AAV how much do we need to send out?
Doug posted something on this yesterday. If I understand it correctly, Kuminga at $20M will count as $10M to GS. For teams below the apron, for contracts that "count" as being between $7,250,001 and $29 million, you just have to be within $7.5M of the matching salary. So, if Kuminga "counts" as $10 million for GS due to the BYC rule, then anything basically between $2.5M and $17.5M would do it.
https://www.sportsbusinessclassroom.com/understanding-trade-matching-in-the-new-collective-bargaining-agreement/
K. That means Pat is completely out of the question.
Wonder if Bulls could be a 3 way where Kuminga gets somewhere else and Dubs get Ayo but we get a better fit… cuz we know AK won’t accept a pick.
Pat makes a flat $18 million, so. you'd just have to bump Kuminga up to $21M or higher to make it work. (21M / 2 =10.5M + 7.5M =18M)
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,046
- And1: 8,932
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
jnrjr79 wrote:Chi town wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:
Doug posted something on this yesterday. If I understand it correctly, Kuminga at $20M will count as $10M to GS. For teams below the apron, for contracts that "count" as being between $7,250,001 and $29 million, you just have to be within $7.5M of the matching salary. So, if Kuminga "counts" as $10 million for GS due to the BYC rule, then anything basically between $2.5M and $17.5M would do it.
https://www.sportsbusinessclassroom.com/understanding-trade-matching-in-the-new-collective-bargaining-agreement/
K. That means Pat is completely out of the question.
Wonder if Bulls could be a 3 way where Kuminga gets somewhere else and Dubs get Ayo but we get a better fit… cuz we know AK won’t accept a pick.
Pat makes a flat $18 million, so. you'd just have to bump Kuminga up to $21M or higher to make it work. (21M / 2 =10.5M + 7.5M =18M)
So would you rather have Pat at 4/72 or Kuminga at 3/75?
So if we add Ayo who makes 7M we’d have to pay Kuminga 28M? Way too much.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,224
- And1: 1,091
- Joined: Jul 13, 2013
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
kodo wrote:NecessaryEvil wrote:
Suns and Kings being the most aggressive
GS not enormed by the trades they’ve heard so far
The no Chicago interest seems back up reports that the interest is coming mostly from Kuminga's camp. Shams said his #1 priorities are minutes & shots, I could see how he believes he can come in here and be our #1 scorer if White leave next summer.
I think any "Kuminga to Chicago" hypothetical died with the Okoro trade,Jake Fischer said Kuminga's camp wanted to S&T Kuminga to Chicago for Lonzo.
Don’t Kuminga and Okoro complement each other well? I can see each guy hide each other’s deficiencies. I also can see this trade being able to get done using Ayo. Would be even better if Pat Williams can be moved as well.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,272
- And1: 3,672
- Joined: May 27, 2003
- Location: Chicago
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
Chi town wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:Chi town wrote:
K. That means Pat is completely out of the question.
Wonder if Bulls could be a 3 way where Kuminga gets somewhere else and Dubs get Ayo but we get a better fit… cuz we know AK won’t accept a pick.
Pat makes a flat $18 million, so. you'd just have to bump Kuminga up to $21M or higher to make it work. (21M / 2 =10.5M + 7.5M =18M)
So would you rather have Pat at 4/72 or Kuminga at 3/75?
So if we add Ayo who makes 7M we’d have to pay Kuminga 28M? Way too much.
Ugh, this is a tough question. I'd probably rather have Pat if he's playing decent defense, staying healthy, and hitting 40% of his threes on mid-volume. But will that happen? I'd probably roll the dice on Kuminga, who I am otherwise not super interested in, if last year's Pat Williams is who he is now.
I agree I would not add Ayo.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- Senior
- Posts: 667
- And1: 305
- Joined: Jan 12, 2025
- Location: Planet Earth
-
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
I dont want to lose Ayo at all, even less in a trade for Kuminga
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
- Red Larrivee
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,194
- And1: 19,005
- Joined: Feb 15, 2007
- Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
ghostinthepost1 wrote:ghostinthepost1 wrote:It kind of sounds like the Warriors and Kuminga want to do the Ayo S+T but the Bulls want to see what happens with Giddey before doing anything else.
Found a tweet saying the same thing.
This guy (and others) is just remixing something Fischer said weeks ago, except Fischer did not say the Bulls were pursuing Kuminga.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
- dougthonus
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 58,285
- And1: 18,533
- Joined: Dec 22, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
ghostinthepost1 wrote:ghostinthepost1 wrote:It kind of sounds like the Warriors and Kuminga want to do the Ayo S+T but the Bulls want to see what happens with Giddey before doing anything else.
Found a tweet saying the same thing.
That tweet doesn't mention Ayo at all, and is the same level of stuff floating around that the Bulls are interested with literally no backing information whatsoever that makes it sound like a dead rumor (ie, we had a phone call once and are still reporting on it), propaganda by his agent to try to make a non-existent market, or just complete BS where some things are inferred through reasoning then extrapolated into a report.
Things you would see if this was real:
Reports of us talking to GS directly
Reports of us talking to Kuminga's agent directly
Rumors of what we'd offer in trade compensation
Rumors of what we'd offer in salary compensation
None of that is there in any of the Kuminga reporting connecting to the Bulls, and we just had a really direct report from Shams about two teams with offers on the table, if we were really in the mix then you'd think we'd be in that report too.
FWIW, there's also no practical reason that we need to resolve Giddey before Kuminga if we wanted Kuminga. We have enough room under the tax for both given the salary we'd need to trade to get Kuminga.
http://linktr.ee/bullsbeat - links to the bullsbeat podcast
@doug_thonus on twitter
@doug_thonus on twitter
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
- dougthonus
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 58,285
- And1: 18,533
- Joined: Dec 22, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
Am2626 wrote:Don’t Kuminga and Okoro complement each other well? I can see each guy hide each other’s deficiencies. I also can see this trade being able to get done using Ayo. Would be even better if Pat Williams can be moved as well.
Kuminga doesn't really complement anyone, because he's a below average defender, poor BBIQ guy, sub par playmaker, and poor floor spacer. What weakness does Kuminga cover for anyone or enable for anyone? He literally is below average in all complementary skills. Maybe best thing you could say he complements is an uptempo offense that runs a lot, but literally every athletic guy in the league complements that so it isn't much of a differentiator.
http://linktr.ee/bullsbeat - links to the bullsbeat podcast
@doug_thonus on twitter
@doug_thonus on twitter
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,040
- And1: 525
- Joined: Jul 14, 2008
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
dougthonus wrote:Am2626 wrote:Don’t Kuminga and Okoro complement each other well? I can see each guy hide each other’s deficiencies. I also can see this trade being able to get done using Ayo. Would be even better if Pat Williams can be moved as well.
Kuminga doesn't really complement anyone, because he's a below average defender, poor BBIQ guy, sub par playmaker, and poor floor spacer. What weakness does Kuminga cover for anyone or enable for anyone? He literally is below average in all complementary skills. Maybe best thing you could say he complements is an uptempo offense that runs a lot, but literally every athletic guy in the league complements that so it isn't much of a differentiator.
I think there's a reason you hear Ayo's name floated in a potentail Kuminga deal. And that's because Ayo is arguably a more useful player. He plays good defense, is a better shooter with more a consistent longer range on his shot and is a player willing to buy into the system. People are getting caught up in Kuminga's age and athleticism when in reality his TS% is similar to Ayo even though he tends to score closer to the basket and the only real advantage he has over Ayo is that he's more capable of getting to the free throw line which has given him a higher PPG average. If this were a case of the Bulls wanted to move a non-essential part for a position of need that would be one thing. While Ayo is technically replacable, Kuminga would basically be taking minutes away from Matas and likely developmental minutes away from Essengue. The larger question is does Kuminga move the needle in a weakened EC? If the Bulls think so I can understand why they'd make the move. But I don't view trading Ayo for Kuminga as some sort of huge upgrade for us.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,023
- And1: 9,035
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
dougthonus wrote:Am2626 wrote:Don’t Kuminga and Okoro complement each other well? I can see each guy hide each other’s deficiencies. I also can see this trade being able to get done using Ayo. Would be even better if Pat Williams can be moved as well.
Kuminga doesn't really complement anyone, because he's a below average defender, poor BBIQ guy, sub par playmaker, and poor floor spacer. What weakness does Kuminga cover for anyone or enable for anyone? He literally is below average in all complementary skills. Maybe best thing you could say he complements is an uptempo offense that runs a lot, but literally every athletic guy in the league complements that so it isn't much of a differentiator.
Also, if we traded for Kuminga, the only way to start him would be to bench Okoro (or Giddey or Matas, but that's not happening).
Given that AK has not said anything on the topic, I don't see anything happening for Kuminga.

Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,272
- And1: 3,672
- Joined: May 27, 2003
- Location: Chicago
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
sco wrote:dougthonus wrote:Am2626 wrote:Don’t Kuminga and Okoro complement each other well? I can see each guy hide each other’s deficiencies. I also can see this trade being able to get done using Ayo. Would be even better if Pat Williams can be moved as well.
Kuminga doesn't really complement anyone, because he's a below average defender, poor BBIQ guy, sub par playmaker, and poor floor spacer. What weakness does Kuminga cover for anyone or enable for anyone? He literally is below average in all complementary skills. Maybe best thing you could say he complements is an uptempo offense that runs a lot, but literally every athletic guy in the league complements that so it isn't much of a differentiator.
Also, if we traded for Kuminga, the only way to start him would be to bench Okoro (or Giddey or Matas, but that's not happening).
Given that AK has not said anything on the topic, I don't see anything happening for Kuminga.
AK's comments on the Okoro trade were basically "we feel like the team had an offensive identity, but needed a defensive identity, too." I agree it would be a little odd to see him relegate Okoro to the bench to give Kuminga a whirl if he really means that the team needs to start putting more focus on capable defenders.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,697
- And1: 2,256
- Joined: Apr 28, 2004
-
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,334
- And1: 1,754
- Joined: Jun 07, 2002
- Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
biggestbullsfan wrote:
This is funny, cuz if he worth all that, why they not trying to keep him lol
Yeah, that merits a "har, sure"
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
- coldfish
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 60,379
- And1: 37,422
- Joined: Jun 11, 2004
- Location: Right in the middle
-
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
The more I read about Kuminga the less I want him.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,778
- And1: 10,457
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
Chi town wrote:jnrjr79 wrote:Chi town wrote:
K. That means Pat is completely out of the question.
Wonder if Bulls could be a 3 way where Kuminga gets somewhere else and Dubs get Ayo but we get a better fit… cuz we know AK won’t accept a pick.
Pat makes a flat $18 million, so. you'd just have to bump Kuminga up to $21M or higher to make it work. (21M / 2 =10.5M + 7.5M =18M)
So would you rather have Pat at 4/72 or Kuminga at 3/75?
So if we add Ayo who makes 7M we’d have to pay Kuminga 28M? Way too much.
Why would we add Ayo? Kuminga's market value is zero or negative.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,885
- And1: 15,302
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: Northshore Burbs
-
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
I wonder if both Kuminga & Giddey take QOs, would be a rarity but at the same time I don't think I've ever seen a FA with 0/30 teams with cap space. Someone is going to offer either guy $25M next season, especially with the cap skyrocketing up every year. It's predicated to be a $200M lux tax in 2027 which is where most teams want to operate just below.
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,778
- And1: 10,457
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
Re: Kuminga sign and trade Bulls interest
kodo wrote:I wonder if both Kuminga & Giddey take QOs, would be a rarity but at the same time I don't think I've ever seen a FA with 0/30 teams with cap space. Someone is going to offer either guy $25M next season, especially with the cap skyrocketing up every year. It's predicated to be a $200M lux tax in 2027 which is where most teams want to operate just below.
The QO is insultingly low by design, the risk for a young guy who thinks he's worth 3x the offer is pretty high.