ImageImageImageImageImage

Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga

Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair

statsman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,890
And1: 660
Joined: Aug 20, 2006

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1421 » by statsman » Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:08 pm

Onus wrote:
statsman wrote:
KevinMcreynolds wrote:Apparently that Carter + protected 1st offer is still on the table. I would totally take that as long as the protection is reasonable

Carter only makes $4.9M. How in the heck do the Kings make the salaries work? The previously rumored Carter/Saric trade is not allowed because Saric cannot be aggregated in a trade until 1/13/26.

I think Carter + Ellis and JK gets 15M as the starting salary works.

Not according to Spotrac. I think the Kings are dealing with a hard cap at the 1st apron, and even at $15M for Kuminga (he's not taking that), the Kings would exceed the 1st apron.

Similar to the Kuminga (@19M start) for Keegan trade idea. The Kings exceed their hard cap at the 1st apron, while the Warriors induce a hard cap at the 1st apron. Spotrac says it would work if both the Kings and the Warriors send a minimum salary player elsewhere. The Warriors could use TJD because he's not guaranteed for this season. Not sure about the Kings. But there would have to be some incentive for the other team(s). The Warriors are running very low on future 2nd round picks.
GS Warriors 1
General Manager
Posts: 8,530
And1: 485
Joined: May 23, 2004
       

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1422 » by GS Warriors 1 » Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:09 pm

DeRozan is out is my guess, not sure where though.
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,916
And1: 7,976
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1423 » by xdrta+ » Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:15 pm

Onus wrote:
statsman wrote:
KevinMcreynolds wrote:Apparently that Carter + protected 1st offer is still on the table. I would totally take that as long as the protection is reasonable

Carter only makes $4.9M. How in the heck do the Kings make the salaries work? The previously rumored Carter/Saric trade is not allowed because Saric cannot be aggregated in a trade until 1/13/26.

I think Carter + Ellis and JK gets 15M as the starting salary works.


Not quite. The could take back 200% of those two, which comes to 14,450,614. Anybody think JK would sign for this?
statsman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,890
And1: 660
Joined: Aug 20, 2006

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1424 » by statsman » Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:17 pm

xdrta+ wrote:
Onus wrote:
statsman wrote:Carter only makes $4.9M. How in the heck do the Kings make the salaries work? The previously rumored Carter/Saric trade is not allowed because Saric cannot be aggregated in a trade until 1/13/26.

I think Carter + Ellis and JK gets 15M as the starting salary works.

Not quite. The could take back 200% of those two, which comes to 14,450,614. Anybody think JK would sign for this?

Ah, I was thinking the Kings were close to the 1st apron that they are hard capped at. Forgot about the 200% rule.
azwfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,513
And1: 3,854
Joined: May 21, 2004
     

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1425 » by azwfan » Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:26 pm

Kings need to send out Malik Monk if its gonna be based around Ellis. Since Warriors couldn't take Monk, he'd need to go elsewhere. Utah for Kyle Anderson would work I think.

GSW in: Ellis, Slomo, 1st
SAC in: JK (lol)
UTA in: Monk, whatever incentive Ainge and get.
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 23,812
And1: 7,163
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1426 » by Onus » Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:26 pm

xdrta+ wrote:
Onus wrote:
statsman wrote:Carter only makes $4.9M. How in the heck do the Kings make the salaries work? The previously rumored Carter/Saric trade is not allowed because Saric cannot be aggregated in a trade until 1/13/26.

I think Carter + Ellis and JK gets 15M as the starting salary works.


Not quite. The could take back 200% of those two, which comes to 14,450,614. Anybody think JK would sign for this?

Fanspo said it worked …
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
NW
Analyst
Posts: 3,107
And1: 654
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
Location: Warriorsworld
   

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1427 » by NW » Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:27 pm

GS Warriors 1 wrote:DeRozan is out is my guess, not sure where though.


Miami has liked him for awhile. Some deal where the Heat get DeRozan, Jazz or Nets get draft capital for taking Rozier and buying out his expiring, Kings get Kuminga, Warriors get Ellis and Carter
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 15,009
And1: 4,223
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1428 » by EvanZ » Fri Jul 25, 2025 9:49 pm

Wait is Sacto now offering Keon and a pick? How are we not taking that?!
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,916
And1: 7,976
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1429 » by xdrta+ » Fri Jul 25, 2025 9:49 pm

Onus wrote:
xdrta+ wrote:
Onus wrote:I think Carter + Ellis and JK gets 15M as the starting salary works.


Not quite. The could take back 200% of those two, which comes to 14,450,614. Anybody think JK would sign for this?

Fanspo said it worked …


It works, I just meant it was less than 15M. And from all reports he wouldn't sign for that anyway.
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,916
And1: 7,976
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1430 » by xdrta+ » Fri Jul 25, 2025 9:55 pm

EvanZ wrote:Wait is Sacto now offering Keon and a pick? How are we not taking that?!


Because it's only being offered on RealGM.
azwfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,513
And1: 3,854
Joined: May 21, 2004
     

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1431 » by azwfan » Fri Jul 25, 2025 11:10 pm

xdrta+ wrote:
EvanZ wrote:Wait is Sacto now offering Keon and a pick? How are we not taking that?!


Because it's only being offered on RealGM.

Realgm sauces seem as reliable as the beat writers these days.
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
vvoland
Veteran
Posts: 2,739
And1: 627
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1432 » by vvoland » Fri Jul 25, 2025 11:45 pm

Onus wrote:
statsman wrote:
KevinMcreynolds wrote:Apparently that Carter + protected 1st offer is still on the table. I would totally take that as long as the protection is reasonable

Carter only makes $4.9M. How in the heck do the Kings make the salaries work? The previously rumored Carter/Saric trade is not allowed because Saric cannot be aggregated in a trade until 1/13/26.

I think Carter + Ellis and JK gets 15M as the starting salary works.


2 more small guards to add to Steph, podz, Melton, and buddy. Still no backup pg in the bunch.

I get the love for Ellis but I doubt he plays over podz and I don't think the Steph/podz/Ellis trio is what people want to see. What we really need is a big wing capable of spelling dray and Jimmy when they rest, while leading the 2nd unit when everyone is healthy. I can understand not wanting to bet on jk being able to do either, much less both. Why restrict ourselves to players like krispert, Devon, ellis, cobi ,etc.? Especially, now.

I just can't imagine they'll be harder to trade for in Feb and the chances we are able to consolidate jk with one more asset and get an avdija, murphy, type are not insignificant. Yes, if it's irreparably broken, let's get the best return we can without giving up future picks (unless we're getting a real closer back). Otherwise, our desire to see the dubs make off-season moves shouldn't put is in a position to sell at an all time low
vvoland
Veteran
Posts: 2,739
And1: 627
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1433 » by vvoland » Fri Jul 25, 2025 11:55 pm

CS707 wrote:
vvoland wrote:
CS707 wrote:I don’t know that the nuance of that number being what he was seeking rather than what the Warriors were offering changes the narrative that his camp significantly overshot his market value. What it actually sounds like is that the Warriors front office realized very quickly that the sides were too far apart for productive discussion and chose the wait and see approach.


If their concern really was the poison pill, like slater said, and they didn't make any contract offer, it sounds like his camp had/has little to do with it.

I don't think any contract would have worked (maybe something like what moody signed is small enough to minimize the PP impact?). Last summer, using JJ as the comp to start a negotiation makes a ton of sense, from the agency side.

Somehow, that got leaked as something JK rejected when nothing, at all, was even offered.


Not making an offer doesn’t mean they didn’t talk numbers. There is a lot of contradictory information out there so who knows what’s the actual truth but I doubt very much that there was zero willingness to engage in reasonable discussion by the Warriors. Up until recently JK was supposedly off limits as a trade option by the organization. Now they wanted to trade him so badly that they refused to talk extension? At the same time, they’re supposedly fighting to retain him this offseason? To me, this feels a lot like JKs camp trying to get control of the narrative.



If the warriors really were more concerned about being able to flip him mid season as bait for their "big game hunt" I don't think the discussions could have been all that meaningful, almost by definition.

I don't recall the poison pill provisions but I don't think the extension could have been for much more than he made last year in order for him to be a decent trade asset. It would have been crazy for them not to approach JK, just in case he wanted to lock in a contract like what moody got, which would only be like a 20% raise, avoiding the PP stuff, I believe. At that point, if they heard the Jalen Johnson contract offered as the comp to start negotiations, they probably decided to stay flexible and punt the extension to this summer.

That's my working theory as it makes the most logical sense, by far, for both sides:
Dubs ask about expectations hoping to hear something that would allow them to negotiate an extension in the 4/60 range so they can move him if Giannis or Butler become available.

JK answers that he sees the JJ contract as a good comp.

The dubs quietly exit, stage left.

In this scenario, everyone does exactly what their clear and obvious expectations are. I'm a bit disappointed I needed slater to spell it out for me.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,043
And1: 8,027
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1434 » by Crazy-Canuck » Sat Jul 26, 2025 12:06 am

Onus wrote:
vvoland wrote:
Onus wrote:It's not if he no longer wants to be here. We're offering the most money and likely the 2nd best role (phx, gsw, sac) and he's still looking for a s&t.


Yes, except we don't know that to be the case. The rumors of the warriors getting more serious about their offer sounds hollow considering slater just told us there were 0 offers seriously discussed last summer after the media letting everyone think we offered 5/150 just 12 months ago.

Not sure about the second best role. If you were JK, would you have any confidence Kerr won't bury you at the first gray cloud? He's been promised everything in the world, including dray's starting spot, only to get single digit minutes shortly thereafter. Not saying he didn't earn many of those setbacks but I'd be much more confident in his minutes in sac, phx, mia, etc than next year in gsw.

Do I think the most likely path is him getting 25+ mins as a spot starter and 6th man? Yes. Would I take the over on 25 mpg and 25 starts? No. If I had to, I'd bet the under on both of those, given even odds.

Read between the lines. We're offering him the most money. We have 3 guys (Steph, JB, Dray) that we can run offense through. The kings have Schroeder, Monk, Lavine, DDR, Sabonis to run offense through. They plan on starting Keegan and want to see what he can do as well. He really thinks he's going to have more opportunities in Sac? I guess in sac he only has to compete with Keegan, DDR for minutes and here he has to compete with JB, Dray and Gui (lmao) for minutes. He's scared he's going to get beat out by Gui?!?! If he can't get 25+ mpg that's on him. He most likely won't get 25 starts here, while he may start in sac, but they won't be running offense through him.

If MDJ is able to get Keon added somehow then I think JK is a King.


Sac GM has already come out and said he wants Keegan at the 3. That's why the kuminga intetest heated up, they want a 4 next to him. So kuminga fits.

Kings have also been trying to unload derozan and monk all off season to no avail.
User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 13,411
And1: 15,553
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1435 » by whatisacenter » Sat Jul 26, 2025 12:12 am

I, for one, am enjoying this....lol.
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
ChuckDurn
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,998
And1: 838
Joined: May 13, 2011

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1436 » by ChuckDurn » Sat Jul 26, 2025 12:22 am

vvoland wrote:
Onus wrote:
statsman wrote:Carter only makes $4.9M. How in the heck do the Kings make the salaries work? The previously rumored Carter/Saric trade is not allowed because Saric cannot be aggregated in a trade until 1/13/26.

I think Carter + Ellis and JK gets 15M as the starting salary works.


2 more small guards to add to Steph, podz, Melton, and buddy. Still no backup pg in the bunch.

I get the love for Ellis but I doubt he plays over podz and I don't think the Steph/podz/Ellis trio is what people want to see. What we really need is a big wing capable of spelling dray and Jimmy when they rest, while leading the 2nd unit when everyone is healthy. I can understand not wanting to bet on jk being able to do either, much less both. Why restrict ourselves to players like krispert, Devon, ellis, cobi ,etc.? Especially, now.

I just can't imagine they'll be harder to trade for in Feb and the chances we are able to consolidate jk with one more asset and get an avdija, murphy, type are not insignificant. Yes, if it's irreparably broken, let's get the best return we can without giving up future picks (unless we're getting a real closer back). Otherwise, our desire to see the dubs make off-season moves shouldn't put is in a position to sell at an all time low

Yeah, I like the potential value of a deal if a Kuminga S&T were to net Ellis and Carter, but you bring up a point I’ve made a couple of times in various threads - they would absolutely need to follow-up with another deal to balance the roster, they’d be way too guard-heavy and with too few wings / combo forward types. Especially if (as I’d like) they continue forward with Melton in the plans.

I do think the need for a traditional back-up point guard isn’t as critical….. even Curry doesn’t really play point guard in a traditional sense, he gets most of his assists because he’s a great decoy (i.e. teams jump to him because of his shooting, leaving other guys open, and he moves the ball). We have a bunch of guys (Butler, Draymond, Podziemski, even Buddy to an extent) who can create shots for others adequately. Though a purer back-up PG obviously wouldn’t be a bad thing.

But our ability to have enough size on the floor, and defense to deal with big wings, would be a real problem. Butler and Draymond are going to miss and rest a decent number of games, and then it’s lean with Moody…… Santos……? Toohey (oy vey)……? Or way, way too many 3-guard lineups.
If I don't have anything funny to say, can I still have a signature?
CS707
General Manager
Posts: 8,628
And1: 7,120
Joined: Dec 23, 2003

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1437 » by CS707 » Sat Jul 26, 2025 1:04 am

vvoland wrote:
CS707 wrote:
vvoland wrote:
If their concern really was the poison pill, like slater said, and they didn't make any contract offer, it sounds like his camp had/has little to do with it.

I don't think any contract would have worked (maybe something like what moody signed is small enough to minimize the PP impact?). Last summer, using JJ as the comp to start a negotiation makes a ton of sense, from the agency side.

Somehow, that got leaked as something JK rejected when nothing, at all, was even offered.


Not making an offer doesn’t mean they didn’t talk numbers. There is a lot of contradictory information out there so who knows what’s the actual truth but I doubt very much that there was zero willingness to engage in reasonable discussion by the Warriors. Up until recently JK was supposedly off limits as a trade option by the organization. Now they wanted to trade him so badly that they refused to talk extension? At the same time, they’re supposedly fighting to retain him this offseason? To me, this feels a lot like JKs camp trying to get control of the narrative.



If the warriors really were more concerned about being able to flip him mid season as bait for their "big game hunt" I don't think the discussions could have been all that meaningful, almost by definition.

I don't recall the poison pill provisions but I don't think the extension could have been for much more than he made last year in order for him to be a decent trade asset. It would have been crazy for them not to approach JK, just in case he wanted to lock in a contract like what moody got, which would only be like a 20% raise, avoiding the PP stuff, I believe. At that point, if they heard the Jalen Johnson contract offered as the comp to start negotiations, they probably decided to stay flexible and punt the extension to this summer.

That's my working theory as it makes the most logical sense, by far, for both sides:
Dubs ask about expectations hoping to hear something that would allow them to negotiate an extension in the 4/60 range so they can move him if Giannis or Butler become available.

JK answers that he sees the JJ contract as a good comp.

The dubs quietly exit, stage left.

In this scenario, everyone does exactly what their clear and obvious expectations are. I'm a bit disappointed I needed slater to spell it out for me.


My working theory is that the idea that they intentionally didn’t sign him because they wanted to trade him is BS. It’s counter to everything we’ve heard about how the organization felt about him for at least a year and contradictory to the also current report that they’re trying to keep him. My guess is that it’s coming from JK’s camp to save face. I assume they exchanged numbers at some point and were so far apart that the front office just said let’s revisit this in the offseason. That would actually make more sense as to why they seem so hellbent on not making a deal now.
Old_Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,473
And1: 1,233
Joined: Jul 02, 2019
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1438 » by Old_Blue » Sat Jul 26, 2025 1:06 am

I'm kind of surprised there haven't been any rumors linking Kuminga to the Spurs. Outside of Wemby and Barnes, nobody on that team can hit a three to save their life. Kuminga would fit right in. :lol:
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom :lol:
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,043
And1: 8,027
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1439 » by Crazy-Canuck » Sat Jul 26, 2025 1:59 am

CS707 wrote:
vvoland wrote:
CS707 wrote:
Not making an offer doesn’t mean they didn’t talk numbers. There is a lot of contradictory information out there so who knows what’s the actual truth but I doubt very much that there was zero willingness to engage in reasonable discussion by the Warriors. Up until recently JK was supposedly off limits as a trade option by the organization. Now they wanted to trade him so badly that they refused to talk extension? At the same time, they’re supposedly fighting to retain him this offseason? To me, this feels a lot like JKs camp trying to get control of the narrative.



If the warriors really were more concerned about being able to flip him mid season as bait for their "big game hunt" I don't think the discussions could have been all that meaningful, almost by definition.

I don't recall the poison pill provisions but I don't think the extension could have been for much more than he made last year in order for him to be a decent trade asset. It would have been crazy for them not to approach JK, just in case he wanted to lock in a contract like what moody got, which would only be like a 20% raise, avoiding the PP stuff, I believe. At that point, if they heard the Jalen Johnson contract offered as the comp to start negotiations, they probably decided to stay flexible and punt the extension to this summer.

That's my working theory as it makes the most logical sense, by far, for both sides:
Dubs ask about expectations hoping to hear something that would allow them to negotiate an extension in the 4/60 range so they can move him if Giannis or Butler become available.

JK answers that he sees the JJ contract as a good comp.

The dubs quietly exit, stage left.

In this scenario, everyone does exactly what their clear and obvious expectations are. I'm a bit disappointed I needed slater to spell it out for me.


My working theory is that the idea that they intentionally didn’t sign him because they wanted to trade him is BS. It’s counter to everything we’ve heard about how the organization felt about him for at least a year and contradictory to the also current report that they’re trying to keep him. My guess is that it’s coming from JK’s camp to save face. I assume they exchanged numbers at some point and were so far apart that the front office just said let’s revisit this in the offseason. That would actually make more sense as to why they seem so hellbent on not making a deal now.


I think this just the continuing struggle between lacob and kerr.

Lacob is not trading kuminga. He believes kuminga is preserving the post steph years.. So, need a "big name" in order for lacob to just sign off on a trade.

Basketball side doesn't want kuminga, they see him every day in practice. They want him moved for better fitting pieces.

So, I believe an extension was talked about. But once a tradeable number was off the table (kuminga looking for 5/150), the talks ended. They didn't want to be stuck adding a pick to get off that contract later (poole).

Imo, he will extend and he will get moved at the deadline for wing who can defend and shoot.
vvoland
Veteran
Posts: 2,739
And1: 627
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#1440 » by vvoland » Sat Jul 26, 2025 2:34 am

CS707 wrote:
My working theory is that the idea that they intentionally didn’t sign him because they wanted to trade him is BS. It’s counter to everything we’ve heard about how the organization felt about him for at least a year and contradictory to the also current report that they’re trying to keep him. My guess is that it’s coming from JK’s camp to save face. I assume they exchanged numbers at some point and were so far apart that the front office just said let’s revisit this in the offseason. That would actually make more sense as to why they seem so hellbent on not making a deal now.


I think we're kinda saying the same thing. This is how I imagine the conversation went:

MDJ: hey, jk. Any thoughts about the contract extension we were talking about?

JK/Agent: sure, thanks for asking. I just saw JJ got 5/150..

MDJ: Not to interrupt but, you may not have heard, moody just signed 3/36.

JK: Oh? Huh....

MDJ: Yeah... Maybe something to think about..

JK: One sec, I'm getting a text. Oh, Jalen Green just said he got 3/106, with a player option in year 3.

MDJ: muthafkkkkk serious? Let me call you back in a bit..

Return to Golden State Warriors