Image ImageImage Image

Bulls projected to win 32.5 games

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

drosestruts
General Manager
Posts: 9,088
And1: 4,224
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
 

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#41 » by drosestruts » Fri Jul 25, 2025 8:25 pm

Hold That wrote:
League Circles wrote:We won 39 games and hard to imagine why we'd be worse at all, let alone significantly worse

Everyone in our division got better and we didn’t.


Pacers - lost Haliburton and Turner

Cavs - probably the same

Bucks - added Turner and Cole Anthony, lost Dame and Lopez. Still have Giannis. Same at best, possibly worse.

Pistons - added Caris LeVert and Duncan Robinson. Lost Beasley (guess he's technically still available). Probably worse. Beasley had a career year and his shooting was very important for them.


So ummm, not that Divisions matter all that much, but I don't think your statement is true at all.
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,642
And1: 3,962
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#42 » by panthermark » Fri Jul 25, 2025 9:34 pm

dougthonus wrote:Man, I'm not a gambler, but the over feels like an automatic to me. I'd definitely stick that in a parlay.

I don't gamble myself, but that seems like easy money. I don't know what a parlay is, but I guess I should look into fandual. Do they take Paypal? $100 bet possible?
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
cocktailswith_2short
Head Coach
Posts: 6,937
And1: 456
Joined: May 25, 2002
     

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#43 » by cocktailswith_2short » Fri Jul 25, 2025 10:29 pm

I actually think we're going to be pretty bad this year some of you guys going to lose some greenbacks.
cocktailswith_2short
Head Coach
Posts: 6,937
And1: 456
Joined: May 25, 2002
     

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#44 » by cocktailswith_2short » Fri Jul 25, 2025 10:37 pm

Doubled up my bad
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,374
And1: 37,418
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#45 » by coldfish » Sat Jul 26, 2025 1:30 am

cocktailswith_2short wrote:I actually think we're going to be pretty bad this year some of you guys going to lose some greenbacks.


I'm generally pretty negative about the direction of the Bulls but I agree with others that the team looks to be young and healthy and also big/athletic in a historically weak eastern conference. I think they will scrounge their way to 35 or more wins. A few injuries could really be a problem but outside of that I think that the over here is the way to go and I don't normally say that.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,284
And1: 18,529
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#46 » by dougthonus » Sat Jul 26, 2025 10:47 am

panthermark wrote:
dougthonus wrote:Man, I'm not a gambler, but the over feels like an automatic to me. I'd definitely stick that in a parlay.

I don't gamble myself, but that seems like easy money. I don't know what a parlay is, but I guess I should look into fandual. Do they take Paypal? $100 bet possible?


A parlay is when you layer multiple bets, and they all have to hit, but they boost the odds. You try and get 3 locks and a payout much larger than they'd normally do. I also don't gamble, but apparently hang out with a lot of gamblers :lol:
http://linktr.ee/bullsbeat - links to the bullsbeat podcast
@doug_thonus on twitter
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 20,883
And1: 15,300
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#47 » by kodo » Sat Jul 26, 2025 3:46 pm

drosestruts wrote:
Hold That wrote:
League Circles wrote:We won 39 games and hard to imagine why we'd be worse at all, let alone significantly worse

Everyone in our division got better and we didn’t.


Pacers - lost Haliburton and Turner

Cavs - probably the same

Bucks - added Turner and Cole Anthony, lost Dame and Lopez. Still have Giannis. Same at best, possibly worse.

Pistons - added Caris LeVert and Duncan Robinson. Lost Beasley (guess he's technically still available). Probably worse. Beasley had a career year and his shooting was very important for them.

So ummm, not that Divisions matter all that much, but I don't think your statement is true at all.


Yeah Boston & Indiana but got much worse and fans of both teams want them to tank for the draft. If they do that, they'll be in the 20s/30s.

I think the craziest thing is that Vegas has Toronto, who were 9 games behind us, 5 games ahead of us. So Brandon Ingram is worth 14 wins, apparently he's the next Donovan Mitchell.

And the "everyone got better" reasoning didn't seem to result in Miami getting lower odds. They did nothing, were at 37 wins, and are predicted at 37 wins. One line has them at 40. So Vegas thinks the East got a little worse (which is true IMO).
vxmike
Head Coach
Posts: 6,638
And1: 4,537
Joined: Sep 24, 2014
 

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#48 » by vxmike » Sun Jul 27, 2025 6:49 pm

_txchilibowl_ wrote:Not sure how a better team in a worse conference wins less games but ok...


Better? How exactly did the team improve? The East did get a lot worse I’ll give you that.
_txchilibowl_
Starter
Posts: 2,482
And1: 2,670
Joined: Aug 17, 2017
     

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#49 » by _txchilibowl_ » Sun Jul 27, 2025 11:54 pm

vxmike wrote:
_txchilibowl_ wrote:Not sure how a better team in a worse conference wins less games but ok...


Better? How exactly did the team improve? The East did get a lot worse I’ll give you that.



Internal growth. Team cohesion. Young players being more experienced and having a better understanding of the system we're running. I think all of these factors will lead to better basketball being played.
User avatar
CROBulls
Rookie
Posts: 1,033
And1: 693
Joined: Jan 11, 2022
 

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#50 » by CROBulls » Mon Jul 28, 2025 12:39 am

_txchilibowl_ wrote:
vxmike wrote:
_txchilibowl_ wrote:Not sure how a better team in a worse conference wins less games but ok...


Better? How exactly did the team improve? The East did get a lot worse I’ll give you that.



Internal growth. Team cohesion. Young players being more experienced and having a better understanding of the system we're running. I think all of these factors will lead to better basketball being played.

Not for Bulls.
SfBull
General Manager
Posts: 7,939
And1: 1,837
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
       

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#51 » by SfBull » Mon Jul 28, 2025 3:31 am

ghostinthepost1 wrote:I feel like ~30 wins is the only scenario I can't see.

You could tell me the Bulls win 50 games and I'd believe you because maybe:
- The leap we saw from Giddey and/or Coby was real last year.
- Matas wins MIP
- All our sort of shooters (Pat, Ayo, Okoro, Giddey, Vooch, Smith, etc) all have good good shooting seasons.

You could tell me the Bulls win 25 games and I'd believe you because maybe:
- Coby remains inconsistent.
- Giddey can't shoot or defend
- Matas is meh
- The Bulls tank hard after the first 30ish games.

Not happening
User avatar
Mr. Tibbs
Head Coach
Posts: 6,447
And1: 497
Joined: Jun 25, 2006

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#52 » by Mr. Tibbs » Tue Jul 29, 2025 10:23 pm

I'd go over also, but I don't think 32.5 is that crazy. I generally felt like we overachieved last year and I do see some negative regression candidates on this roster, Vooch being the obvious one imo. I don't know our clutch game record off hand but it felt like won our fair share. Mickey Mouse March padded our win total as well.

I think we'll show those vegas clowns what's up and give them the middle finger while we lose the play-in, as is tradition. If we break past that threshold, I'd imagine (and hope) it's because Matas takes a leap.
RIP Johnny Red Kerr, Norm Van Lier, Pdenninggolden, Bullsmaniac
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,277
And1: 11,144
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#53 » by MrSparkle » Tue Jul 29, 2025 11:20 pm

This is the type of team that’ll lose by 40 points opening night to a Haliburton-less Pacers or Tatum-less/G-League Celtics team.

It’ll also be the team that beats the Nuggets, Lakers or Warriors on their off-nights…

So basically… the same ole **** since 2021. There’s just enough depth to put a respectable roster out for 82 games regardless of injuries… and just enough liabilities to exploit in any line-up Donovan will play.

I think 32-40 is a fair range of wins. Hard to tell how hard some teams throw in the towel (Celtics, Wizards, Nets, Hornets). And there is a scenario where this team gels. I’m just afraid that the ceiling sucks no matter how well it comes together. Successfully developed prime Matas and Noa would ve something, but that’s 3Y+ and 50% odds away.
jacoby1us
General Manager
Posts: 8,936
And1: 1,659
Joined: Apr 22, 2003
   

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#54 » by jacoby1us » Wed Jul 30, 2025 3:03 pm

I'll take the over for 37 wins.
#TEARITDOWNTOTHESTUDS
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,018
And1: 9,034
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#55 » by sco » Wed Jul 30, 2025 5:26 pm

I think the blueprint for beating us this season (assuming Vuc isn't gone) will be, "Double-Coby and attack the rim". It seems pretty simple. IMO the keys for us to approach .500 will be to get rid of Vuc (both Collins and Smith >> Vuc defensively) and Matas to become a better 3rd option scorer (ideally 2nd option).
:clap:
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 20,883
And1: 15,300
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#56 » by kodo » Wed Jul 30, 2025 11:26 pm

Vegas odds in the summer are always wildly off so it's fine and part of why we watch, seasons never turn out how everyone expects them.
Last summer:
Detroit: 24 wins (actual 44)
Bulls: 30 (actual 39)
Clippers: 40 (actual 50)
Rockets: 42 (actual 52)
Portland: 21 (actual 36)
User avatar
Future Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,246
And1: 510
Joined: Jul 07, 2006

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#57 » by Future Coach » Yesterday 5:40 am

dougthonus wrote:
DrModesty wrote:I feel like the 'East got weaker' stuff applies to every other team more than Chicago.

Teams that were out of Chicago's league got worse, but not to the point where they are clearly worse than the Bulls. In fact most would pick Boston, Pacers, Bucks to finish ahead of them next year.

On the other hand the teams around Chicago all got better. Atlanta is better. Orlando is better. Toronto is better. Philadelphia will be better even if PG13 and Embiid are injured again. Charlotte is worse than Chicago, but they have been destroyed by injuries for several years in a row. If they are healthy for once they might be on the Bulls level. Miami is the only question mark, and they got Powell for free, Bam had his worst year since he became a guy, and they can put the toxic Butler situation behind them properly. They will also be looking at Ware to make a leap like Chicago is looking at Matas.

Plus the Bulls were more healthy than most teams last year as far as they primary players are concerned (Lavine, Giddey, Coby). The guys who came over in the Lavine trade also played close to career best too, when on other lottery teams they fell down the pecking order over time. I doubt Giddey has a regression year given the first half of the season, but I can definitely see a shooting regression coming. Coby, who knows. These guys are going to go in to the season as the guys that actually got scouted against this time. Matas too, to an extent.

The Bulls made a low level addition in Okoro (Who is worse than Lonzo, but healthier). They picked a raw 18 year old project in the draft. Vuc is another year older. A huge number of guys playing for contracts, and not necessarily with the Bulls.

This does have the makings of a 30-33 win team.


If we have the makings of a 30-33 win team, then we should be forcing Josh Giddey out, selling Ayo, Coby, and literally everyone except Matas/Noa for anything we can get.


I only have a few hesitations with that statement:
- Giddey's still very young.
- The reality of the NBA's team minimum salary - at least one player often has to get paid a pretty high annual amount, and no one on the team is currently getting it. Giddey for $25M-$30M annually for the next few years can fill that role.
- Tre Jones is on a good value deal and can play a bigger role. In other words, he shouldn't be given away cheaply.
- And, of course, we should never trade for just "anything we can get," but rather "the most we can get."

Otherwise, yes:
- Coby should be traded. He is going to want a higher contract than the Bulls should pay (for the quality of team he would lead them to in the coming seasons).
- For Ayo, it's hard for me to identify how much he will command on the open market, but the Bulls are in no position to pay top money for a player like him for the next few years (especially with Tre Jones on the roster). So unless they project him to be the starting PG or are committed to having a small back court going forward, he should probably be traded as well before his contract runs up.
- Like you said, the same can basically be said for everyone except Matas/Noa, plus what I mentioned about Tre Jones above. Though I could be swayed on moving Noa for the right price, but he's the type of players the Bulls should be seeking and featuring right now - young and with high potential.
- The Bulls need to quit letting players with expiring contracts walk at the end of seasons. Utilize the assets to get something in return while it is still possible.

Rack up future picks while bringing in hardworking, underappreciated (/undervalued) players where possible. Draft well, continue to collect assets where possible, then consolidate multiple players on good contracts and picks in trades for great players to play with Matas in a few years. That's the process that should have been happening for years now, and there's no reason why we still shouldn't proceed that way.


As far as the initial question, I think we should be a little over, but we're an injury or two away from making lengthy watch threads for AJ Dybantsa.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,018
And1: 9,034
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bulls projected to win 32.5 games 

Post#58 » by sco » Yesterday 2:39 pm

Future Coach wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
DrModesty wrote:I feel like the 'East got weaker' stuff applies to every other team more than Chicago.

Teams that were out of Chicago's league got worse, but not to the point where they are clearly worse than the Bulls. In fact most would pick Boston, Pacers, Bucks to finish ahead of them next year.

On the other hand the teams around Chicago all got better. Atlanta is better. Orlando is better. Toronto is better. Philadelphia will be better even if PG13 and Embiid are injured again. Charlotte is worse than Chicago, but they have been destroyed by injuries for several years in a row. If they are healthy for once they might be on the Bulls level. Miami is the only question mark, and they got Powell for free, Bam had his worst year since he became a guy, and they can put the toxic Butler situation behind them properly. They will also be looking at Ware to make a leap like Chicago is looking at Matas.

Plus the Bulls were more healthy than most teams last year as far as they primary players are concerned (Lavine, Giddey, Coby). The guys who came over in the Lavine trade also played close to career best too, when on other lottery teams they fell down the pecking order over time. I doubt Giddey has a regression year given the first half of the season, but I can definitely see a shooting regression coming. Coby, who knows. These guys are going to go in to the season as the guys that actually got scouted against this time. Matas too, to an extent.

The Bulls made a low level addition in Okoro (Who is worse than Lonzo, but healthier). They picked a raw 18 year old project in the draft. Vuc is another year older. A huge number of guys playing for contracts, and not necessarily with the Bulls.

This does have the makings of a 30-33 win team.


If we have the makings of a 30-33 win team, then we should be forcing Josh Giddey out, selling Ayo, Coby, and literally everyone except Matas/Noa for anything we can get.


I only have a few hesitations with that statement:
- Giddey's still very young.
- The reality of the NBA's team minimum salary - at least one player often has to get paid a pretty high annual amount, and no one on the team is currently getting it. Giddey for $25M-$30M annually for the next few years can fill that role.
- Tre Jones is on a good value deal and can play a bigger role. In other words, he shouldn't be given away cheaply.
- And, of course, we should never trade for just "anything we can get," but rather "the most we can get."

Otherwise, yes:
- Coby should be traded. He is going to want a higher contract than the Bulls should pay (for the quality of team he would lead them to in the coming seasons).
- For Ayo, it's hard for me to identify how much he will command on the open market, but the Bulls are in no position to pay top money for a player like him for the next few years (especially with Tre Jones on the roster). So unless they project him to be the starting PG or are committed to having a small back court going forward, he should probably be traded as well before his contract runs up.
- Like you said, the same can basically be said for everyone except Matas/Noa, plus what I mentioned about Tre Jones above. Though I could be swayed on moving Noa for the right price, but he's the type of players the Bulls should be seeking and featuring right now - young and with high potential.
- The Bulls need to quit letting players with expiring contracts walk at the end of seasons. Utilize the assets to get something in return while it is still possible.

Rack up future picks while bringing in hardworking, underappreciated (/undervalued) players where possible. Draft well, continue to collect assets where possible, then consolidate multiple players on good contracts and picks in trades for great players to play with Matas in a few years. That's the process that should have been happening for years now, and there's no reason why we still shouldn't proceed that way.


As far as the initial question, I think we should be a little over, but we're an injury or two away from making lengthy watch threads for AJ Dybantsa.

I think it is easy to say that we should be trading guys before they expire, but the truth is trickier. We've had little to show from our picks developing into good enough players to obviously keep, and by extension, players that other teams will give up first round picks for. I also think that the whole "big 3" structure tended to (Please Use More Appropriate Word) the development of young guys because there really wasn't a bigger role for them to grow in to.

I am big believer that 1 guy can drastically change a team's record. I have some belief in our new scheme working reasonably well against the current NBA where a lot of the stars are over 30. As such, I strongly believe that getting rid of Vuc could make a 10 w/l difference for us.
:clap:

Return to Chicago Bulls