Would you prefer to have Myers instead of Dunleavy right now?

[SpreeChokeJob]

Myers. He has better understanding of being a GM. He’s more of a manager than Dunleavy. Dunleavy is a scout, but he doesn’t have the interpersonal skills to deal with the players. Myers would have been ok if he stuck in his area and there was someone like Nellie or West overseeing personnel decisions as a consultant, but then Lacob inserted himself into that role and everything fell apart.

[thunderdunk]

MDJ. No more stupid, panicky contracts like Poole's.

[dk1115]

TBH, I think both of them have done good jobs. Other than the Wiseman draft pick, which I still don't mind much, and signing Jordan Poole to that crazy contract, Myers help construct a 4-championship run.

Mike Dunleavy somehow got rid of Poole's contract and got some good pieces in return. He got Jimmy Butler for basically Andrew Wiggins. We had no first round draft picks this year, and signing free agents are contingent to the Kuminga situation, so not really sure how that's on him.

[oaktownwarriors87]

Bob was doing so well until the Wiseman debacle unfolded.

He was doing "well" until his mistakes couldn't be masked by Curry.

The best things that happened under Bob Myer were the Iguodala and Durant acquisitions, but even those happened because of Curry.

Doe anyone honestly believe that the Warriors would have been WORSE had someone of Mike Dunleavys caliber been hired instead of Myers? I can only imagine the upside.

Honestly. Is anyone really that happy that Bob Myers was "keeping things together" during the Curry and Kerr years? He didn't even have to do anything. Every decision he made could have been throwing a dart at the wall. I have little doubt that GROK would do a better job than Bob Myers at managing this team.