Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,775
- And1: 7,754
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
I liked it. I do not think anyone is owed, but you can throw in 1-2 seconds from any team to any team?
Dallas: Martin, Hardy, Powell
Dallas: Mann
Trims 2 roster spots and 4 million while getting a useful enough two way wing. Exum and a big unless the team wants to go with Ryan.
Boston: Simons
Boston: Martin
Boston trims 18 million dollars and gets a hopefully bounce back 3/d rotation wing. Trim the last few million under tax midseason.
Brooklyn: Mann
Brooklyn: Simons, Powell, Hardy
Even if they have to buy out Hardy and Powell, they get clear 9 mil from Mann’s second year and the entire third year in years they hope cap space will actually matter. No idea how much cap space Brooklyn still has, but they should still be close to this amount, or use the room ex for either Hardy or Powell if needed.
Dallas: Martin, Hardy, Powell
Dallas: Mann
Trims 2 roster spots and 4 million while getting a useful enough two way wing. Exum and a big unless the team wants to go with Ryan.
Boston: Simons
Boston: Martin
Boston trims 18 million dollars and gets a hopefully bounce back 3/d rotation wing. Trim the last few million under tax midseason.
Brooklyn: Mann
Brooklyn: Simons, Powell, Hardy
Even if they have to buy out Hardy and Powell, they get clear 9 mil from Mann’s second year and the entire third year in years they hope cap space will actually matter. No idea how much cap space Brooklyn still has, but they should still be close to this amount, or use the room ex for either Hardy or Powell if needed.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 6,866
- And1: 8,267
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Quick reaction without diving into the salary cap details for each team
Dallas: sure, why not
Boston: maybe I am too harsh on SImons, but I think BOS needs to offer up something worthwhile to move him
Brooklyn: it may or may not be bad on value, but I just don't see the point
IMO it needs at least a couple of SRPs from BOS to BKN to fix it, and I'm open to arguments from Brooklyn fans that they just aren't interested.
Dallas: sure, why not
Boston: maybe I am too harsh on SImons, but I think BOS needs to offer up something worthwhile to move him
Brooklyn: it may or may not be bad on value, but I just don't see the point
IMO it needs at least a couple of SRPs from BOS to BKN to fix it, and I'm open to arguments from Brooklyn fans that they just aren't interested.
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,959
- And1: 12,744
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
I think it’s probably fair.
From the Boston perspective it comes down to is it worth it to get under the tax this year at the cost of adding the future salary and reducing flexibility for 26/27 and 27/28.
IDK, maybe it is.
I personally want to see what Simons can do here and part of me thinks he could be a long term piece.
From the Boston perspective it comes down to is it worth it to get under the tax this year at the cost of adding the future salary and reducing flexibility for 26/27 and 27/28.
IDK, maybe it is.
I personally want to see what Simons can do here and part of me thinks he could be a long term piece.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,775
- And1: 7,754
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
oldncreaky wrote:
Brooklyn: it may or may not be bad on value, but I just don't see the point
IMO it needs at least a couple of SRPs from BOS to BKN to fix it, and I'm open to arguments from Brooklyn fans that they just aren't interested.
I can understand a couple seconds, but I think given Brooklyn’s situation (one tank season followed by pick debt) - gaining 9 mil in cap space next summer and 15 the following is a huge benefit.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,959
- And1: 12,744
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
oldncreaky wrote:Quick reaction without diving into the salary cap details for each team
Dallas: sure, why not
Boston: maybe I am too harsh on SImons, but I think BOS needs to offer up something worthwhile to move him
Brooklyn: it may or may not be bad on value, but I just don't see the point
IMO it needs at least a couple of SRPs from BOS to BKN to fix it, and I'm open to arguments from Brooklyn fans that they just aren't interested.
Boston is actually adding more total $$ in this case. I think if there is picks needed Boston would pass.
Brooklyn received the 18th pick last year for taking on Mann. Fair point about why for Brooklyn through. There seems to be little reason to do it.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 6,866
- And1: 8,267
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
brackdan70 wrote:oldncreaky wrote:Quick reaction without diving into the salary cap details for each team
Dallas: sure, why not
Boston: maybe I am too harsh on SImons, but I think BOS needs to offer up something worthwhile to move him
Brooklyn: it may or may not be bad on value, but I just don't see the point
IMO it needs at least a couple of SRPs from BOS to BKN to fix it, and I'm open to arguments from Brooklyn fans that they just aren't interested.
Boston is actually adding more total $$ in this case. I think if there is picks needed Boston would pass.
Brooklyn received the 18th pick last year for taking on Mann. Fair point about why for Brooklyn through. There seems to be little reason to do it.
OK, good points. The perils of commenting before looking at the details . . .
So I went and looked at a multi-year view of Brooklyn's cap sheet. If I'm reading it right, with pending transactions (for ZWilliams and Sharpe) they still need to spend about $15M to get to the min salary threshold; they have one regular roster spot open; they still have a cap hold for Cam Thomas.
Therefore, Brooklyn either needs to do a trade that adds $15M in salary, or they need to sign Thomas. They don't need to do both, so this trade makes sense if they move on from Thomas
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,775
- And1: 7,754
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
brackdan70 wrote:oldncreaky wrote:Quick reaction without diving into the salary cap details for each team
Dallas: sure, why not
Boston: maybe I am too harsh on SImons, but I think BOS needs to offer up something worthwhile to move him
Brooklyn: it may or may not be bad on value, but I just don't see the point
IMO it needs at least a couple of SRPs from BOS to BKN to fix it, and I'm open to arguments from Brooklyn fans that they just aren't interested.
Boston is actually adding more total $$ in this case. I think if there is picks needed Boston would pass.
Brooklyn received the 18th pick last year for taking on Mann. Fair point about why for Brooklyn through. There seems to be little reason to do it.
You’re saying 1.5ish extra of total salary over 3 years?
What about 70~ million dollars in tax saved this season? That seems a little reason to do it.
It is like a stretch waive of Simons that can be aggregated later and play 20+ minutes per game a night..
And I really don’t even know if Martin should be seen as a lock to opt into his 9.3 mil player option. If he’s healthy and playing like he does, I kind of see him opting out at 32 years old and trying to get a long term deal. Feels much more of a coin flip than some have it, a year ago he was seen as a bargain signing.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,293
- And1: 17,089
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Mavs owe 1-2 2nds IMO, Celtics also, but I like it for all teams.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,077
- And1: 912
- Joined: Nov 06, 2003
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Terrance Mann has been solid players as a Clippers but is considered overpaid since leaving. The Mavs has not traded any part of the rotation. I think value-wise, it's great despite Mann being overpaid. Mann can actually complete for the starting 2 role with Klay. In case, the Mavs opts for a shooter. The only downside is that this trades take minutes away from Max Christie. But I like this 3 for 1 idea to retain Kai Jones as well. And the Mavs rotation is pretty much set.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,822
- And1: 4,090
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Mavrelous wrote:Mavs owe 1-2 2nds IMO, Celtics also, but I like it for all teams.
DIsagree, Dallas is taking on more salary in money and years, Mann is not that good. Think the deal as is, is right
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,242
- And1: 9,822
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
And that's what we call a very positive reception to a well designed trade proposal, ie. no one hates it. Congratulations.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,097
- And1: 1,434
- Joined: Jan 15, 2015
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
No issue with this at all, Boston does great in savings which they would be happy to pay a second for it, even if Simons does have upside for Brooklyn to get over keeping Mann, although the Nets drafted Egor and Traore and will have Cam Thomas with the team already at the 2, theres still minutes for everyone probably.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,827
- And1: 9,247
- Joined: May 28, 2020
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Well thought out idea. I think BRK sees value in turning Mann's 3 year deal into mostly expiring money. BOS gets the current year savings and positional swap for roster balance value here at the cost of taking on multi year money they can afford. DAL turns non rotation pieces into a rotation player without really taking on much long term salary factoring in the outgoing money.
I feel like BOS might need to take back Hardy to balance this, and that's ok IMO.
Pritchard / Hardy
White / Hugo Gonzalez (1st round pick)
Brown / Scheierman (last year's 1st rounder)
Martin / Niang or Hauser (other one dealt to duck the tax)
Queta / Garza / Tillman
Obviously not great without a real center and Tatum out, but that's an ok tank roster for getting their younger guys some playing time off the bench in a reset year. Next year they have a good deal of payroll room below the tax and Tatum will be back so they can find a big man solution.
I feel like BOS might need to take back Hardy to balance this, and that's ok IMO.
Pritchard / Hardy
White / Hugo Gonzalez (1st round pick)
Brown / Scheierman (last year's 1st rounder)
Martin / Niang or Hauser (other one dealt to duck the tax)
Queta / Garza / Tillman
Obviously not great without a real center and Tatum out, but that's an ok tank roster for getting their younger guys some playing time off the bench in a reset year. Next year they have a good deal of payroll room below the tax and Tatum will be back so they can find a big man solution.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,363
- And1: 441
- Joined: Jan 22, 2020
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
DAL would rather keep what they have, instead of increase further salary commitment, without any incentives coming in
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,638
- And1: 4,537
- Joined: Sep 24, 2014
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Good trade. BKN could try to build up Simons’ value and flip him to someone who needs shooting mid-year.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 989
- And1: 585
- Joined: May 22, 2018
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Nets likely want to give their rookies more rein to handle the ball. Three of whom are rookies and adding another ball dominant scoring guard may not be the best option. Simons and Cam Thomas is not the guys you want getting majority of the usage if you are trying to develop 5 rookies (3 who need the ball to be effective).
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,020
- And1: 290
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
Just trade Simons to Portland for Timelord and Rupert. Better than whatever MLE guy Portland is going to sign and it's not like they need Timelord. Both teams stay under the tax and get their vets back.
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,959
- And1: 12,744
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
bgrep14 wrote:Just trade Simons to Portland for Timelord and Rupert. Better than whatever MLE guy Portland is going to sign and it's not like they need Timelord. Both teams stay under the tax and get their vets back.
Portland can’t trade for Simons until the 26/27 season ( July 1, 2026)
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,899
- And1: 1,572
- Joined: Jun 19, 2007
-
Re: Simons to Brooklyn, Mann to Dallas, bad idea
I don’t mind it for Brooklyn, but FYI the Nets probably would not do something like this.
Mann is the PoA defender they have been seeking to pair next to Thomas. Also, the team has made a point to highlight the fact that Terance is from Brooklyn, he's not core but they won't move him cheaply like this.
Mann is the PoA defender they have been seeking to pair next to Thomas. Also, the team has made a point to highlight the fact that Terance is from Brooklyn, he's not core but they won't move him cheaply like this.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
-- Steve Martin
Return to Trades and Transactions