NinjaBro wrote:Rudy Gay 2.0
If he bans scoresheets you may be on to something…
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
NinjaBro wrote:Rudy Gay 2.0
Westside Gunn wrote:Ingram's case is kind of the same but different, he's on a stacked team which won't allow him to have the free rein like Gay did. You have Scottie Barnes, RJ, Quick, and potentially Dick to make up for that potential Gay black hole and to keep things in check.
OakleyDokely wrote:I hated Rudy Gay because he was such a blackhole on offense. In TOR he had 2.2 AST to 3.3 TO which is hilariously bad.
Ingram, like Siakam, developed himself into a good playmaker, who generally ends up in the 5-6 assist range every year.
The Raps have lacked a guy who you could dump the ball to late in the shotclock, who can create something out of nothing. But he's also able to work within a functional offense without messing up the flow.
TimeForChange wrote:
DG88 wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:I hated Rudy Gay because he was such a blackhole on offense. In TOR he had 2.2 AST to 3.3 TO which is hilariously bad.
Ingram, like Siakam, developed himself into a good playmaker, who generally ends up in the 5-6 assist range every year.
The Raps have lacked a guy who you could dump the ball to late in the shotclock, who can create something out of nothing. But he's also able to work within a functional offense without messing up the flow.
MEDIC wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:I hated Rudy Gay because he was such a blackhole on offense. In TOR he had 2.2 AST to 3.3 TO which is hilariously bad.
Ingram, like Siakam, developed himself into a good playmaker, who generally ends up in the 5-6 assist range every year.
The Raps have lacked a guy who you could dump the ball to late in the shotclock, who can create something out of nothing. But he's also able to work within a functional offense without messing up the flow.
Bosh was the same as Rudy Gay (black hole)........except Bosh could actually score efficiently. Efficient or not......we were never going to win anything with Bosh playing that way.
Having your go-to guy be a willing playmaker & a good passer is a must. Ingram is probably a better playmaker/ passer than Scottie. That's how good he is.
DreamTeam09 wrote:He's not imo, but he's still good nonetheless
tsherkin wrote:DreamTeam09 wrote:He's not imo, but he's still good nonetheless
He's more mobile, he's more patient, he draws a D in more effectively. I don't really see Scottie do anything which sets him apart from Ingram in that regard.
DreamTeam09 wrote:Scottie can initiate an offense, BI can make the right play because scorers attract attention & he's not selfish. Scottie is by far the better lead team offense initiator