Shams: Fox gets max extension.

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,893
And1: 373
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#41 » by schaffy » Mon Aug 4, 2025 9:31 pm

One_and_Done wrote:
gswhoops wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:How many all-nba teams did Scottie Barnes or Wagner make prior to their extensions?

The poster I'm replying to specifically referred to Fox as an All NBA guard.

He's s borderline all-nba guard, but a pretty firm all-star calibre guy. In the East he'd make it every other year.


He's made a single all-nba 3rd team and only 1 other year even received votes -- and wasnt even close to making the team. His only All-star appearance was as an injury replacement. He isn't a firm all star at all and he certainly isn't a consistent, borderline all-nba guy.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,520
And1: 98,653
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#42 » by Texas Chuck » Mon Aug 4, 2025 9:38 pm

Incredible deal for Fox.

Sent from my SM-A156U using RealGM mobile app
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,546
And1: 43,752
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#43 » by zimpy27 » Mon Aug 4, 2025 9:46 pm

So Spurs are going for Fox-Wemby to try contend while they develop Harper-Castle-Sochan.

Then they have a few average wings: Vassell, Barnes, Keldon
And. A couple average bigs: Olynyk, Kornet


It does seem like they are trying to get spacing bigs to open driving lane for Fox. He should have his best season next season.

If Fox falters this season I could see this contract being worst in the league.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,647
And1: 6,310
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#44 » by gswhoops » Mon Aug 4, 2025 10:03 pm

zimpy27 wrote:So Spurs are going for Fox-Wemby to try contend while they develop Harper-Castle-Sochan.

Then they have a few average wings: Vassell, Barnes, Keldon
And. A couple average bigs: Olynyk, Kornet


It does seem like they are trying to get spacing bigs to open driving lane for Fox. He should have his best season next season.

If Fox falters this season I could see this contract being worst in the league.

I think this is ultimately where my biggest issue with this deal is. The upside is basically that he reverts to his 22-23 form, and then he's just fairly paid (or arguably still slightly overpaid). The downside is that he continues to basically be a good but not great starting PG and this quickly becomes an albatross that hampers their ability to build around Wemby.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,924
And1: 7,867
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#45 » by jayjaysee » Mon Aug 4, 2025 10:22 pm

Barnes and Wagner are 5 year contracts not 4 year. Fox is making on average 9 million more a year than those guys during that extension.

And those guys have been in the league 4 years less than Fox.. seems a random comparison to me.

I don’t really see why Fox is a 30% max guy. I would’ve understood a 3yr max, it’s just the fourth year to me. Or a 2+po if Fox wanted that..

But I do think Fox is talented enough that he’ll be flipped similar to LaVine in 3 years? So not actually worst contract in the league, just never an asset unless Fox plays his best ball.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,908
And1: 35,992
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#46 » by jbk1234 » Mon Aug 4, 2025 10:40 pm

One_and_Done wrote:
gswhoops wrote:
Snakebites wrote:
Harper extension wouldn't kick in until after Fox's deal expires. Fox will be an expiring deal by the time a hypothetical Castle extension would kick in.

They'll be fine.

And if their "nightmare" scenario is that they have too many All NBA guards and can't pay them all, I think that's a pretty good floor.

Fox had one all NBA season, three seasons ago, that's looking more and more like an outlier as time passes. What do you think the odds he'll be an All-NBA player under his current deal?

And this deal will overlap with Wemby's extension in year 3, Wemby + Castle in year 4, and Wemby + Castle + Harper in year 5.

How many all-nba teams did Scottie Barnes or Wagner make prior to their extensions?


Those were rookie max deals (25% of the cap).
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,240
And1: 5,610
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#47 » by One_and_Done » Mon Aug 4, 2025 10:55 pm

Your market price is what other teams are willing to pay.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
facothomas22
Analyst
Posts: 3,709
And1: 2,179
Joined: Jul 02, 2018
   

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#48 » by facothomas22 » Mon Aug 4, 2025 11:02 pm

There's going to be buyers remorse with this contract. Paying Max Money to a borderline all star in the new CBA isn't a smart thing to do. This also will hurt the development of Stephen Castle/Dylan Harper.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,217
And1: 13,037
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#49 » by brackdan70 » Tue Aug 5, 2025 12:02 am

It’s fine
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 29,501
And1: 7,455
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#50 » by Crazy-Canuck » Tue Aug 5, 2025 12:24 am

I dont know what's worse, this or the book extension. Both seem horrible.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,068
And1: 4,352
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#51 » by basketballwacko2 » Tue Aug 5, 2025 1:02 am

gswhoops wrote:I assume this was in the can before the trade, but that is a LOT of money for a borderline All-Star level guy



This looks like an over pay!
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#52 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Aug 5, 2025 1:03 am

HornetJail wrote:I still think he gets traded before the Spurs actually wind up paying out any of this contract, unless Castle and/or Harper lay an egg this year

You think Fox at $50+ million is going to be easy to move?
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#53 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Aug 5, 2025 1:04 am

brackdan70 wrote:It’s fine

for Fox.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,145
And1: 8,496
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#54 » by SNPA » Tue Aug 5, 2025 1:13 am

I’m glad Sac didn’t have to pay him that going forward. LaVine is movable in a year.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,647
And1: 6,310
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#55 » by gswhoops » Tue Aug 5, 2025 1:22 am

Celts17Pride wrote:
HornetJail wrote:I still think he gets traded before the Spurs actually wind up paying out any of this contract, unless Castle and/or Harper lay an egg this year

You think Fox at $50+ million is going to be easy to move?

Yeah I’ll take the under on that one too
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,546
And1: 43,752
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#56 » by zimpy27 » Tue Aug 5, 2025 1:34 am

gswhoops wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:So Spurs are going for Fox-Wemby to try contend while they develop Harper-Castle-Sochan.

Then they have a few average wings: Vassell, Barnes, Keldon
And. A couple average bigs: Olynyk, Kornet


It does seem like they are trying to get spacing bigs to open driving lane for Fox. He should have his best season next season.

If Fox falters this season I could see this contract being worst in the league.

I think this is ultimately where my biggest issue with this deal is. The upside is basically that he reverts to his 22-23 form, and then he's just fairly paid (or arguably still slightly overpaid). The downside is that he continues to basically be a good but not great starting PG and this quickly becomes an albatross that hampers their ability to build around Wemby.


I mean he should. The Spurs with all stretch bigs should be a field day for Castle, Harper and Fox to pressure the rim.

Fox really should be an all star this season.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,546
And1: 43,752
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#57 » by zimpy27 » Tue Aug 5, 2025 1:37 am

jayjaysee wrote:Barnes and Wagner are 5 year contracts not 4 year. Fox is making on average 9 million more a year than those guys during that extension.

And those guys have been in the league 4 years less than Fox.. seems a random comparison to me.

I don’t really see why Fox is a 30% max guy. I would’ve understood a 3yr max though honestly. Or a 2+po if Fox wanted that instead..

But I do think Fox is talented enough that he’ll be flipped similar to LaVine in 3 years? So not actually worst contract in the league, just never an asset unless Fox plays his best ball.



He's not worse contract in the league now. But he could become that if he doesn't make the most of the spacing the Spurs will have. There is a world where Harper-Castle are a perfect fit and Fox plus-minus drops.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,373
And1: 3,061
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#58 » by BoogieTime » Tue Aug 5, 2025 1:54 am

wemby wrote:Like others have said, this was probably a foregone conclusion at the time of the trade, so no surprises here. As long as Fox picks up where he left off the season before last (the last time he was actually healthy), he'll provide the Spurs some good years before they need to worry about paying his replacements in Castle and Harper.


the year before last he was a sub league average ts% volume scorer who didn't reasonably stretch the floor with a wildly inconsistent motor

He was 'maybe' anywhere worth close to this one year, the year before the year before last year (beam team year)
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,275
And1: 9,771
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#59 » by tmorgan » Tue Aug 5, 2025 4:17 am

If this was from a promise upon his acquisition, so be it.

It almost has to be, because in their current situation, this is insanely stupid.

Fox is an undersized PG with the defensive issues that come from his stature. He’s good finisher, solid from midrange, and weak as you get further out. Solid passer, solid on turnovers, good not great from the line, and his draw rate is declining as he ages and pulls up more.

He’s had one year ever above league average TS, and probably a few others slightly above average for a PG. So, pretty good volume scorer, below average defense at his position, average playmaker. That’s not worth a 30% max extension today. It might have been worth one five years ago, but it DEFINITELY isn’t today.

He’ll be moveable in the sense that teams will take him, but not in the sense that he’ll return real value like Bane did. Lavine-ish. It’s too much money.
Sactowndog
Kings Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 4,453
And1: 1,817
Joined: May 27, 2017

Re: Shams: Fox gets max extension. 

Post#60 » by Sactowndog » Tue Aug 5, 2025 4:52 am

jowglenn wrote:
Klomp wrote:This is wild to me. I'm just not sure this is what's best for Victor, and shouldn't that be the goal for every move going forward?


It gives them a solid veteran all-star-ish lead guard for the next few years while Castle and Harper develop. Someone to win-now with Wemby, and then they can move him in two or three years if Castle and Harper are totally ready.

Imagine if they hadn't traded for Fox, and Wemby - already an all-nba player - was forced to languish with a rookie guard and a second year guard as his backcourt.


Seems very Sac Kingsish. Kings maxed Fox and when Hali came along no one wanted Fox on his contract and they were forced to trade Hali because not enough space for all their guards.

Return to Trades and Transactions