Curmudgeon wrote:He_Got_Game wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:Why does anyone think that Simons will help the Celtics win games?
Because he's an explosive athlete and can score in all 3 levels.
He can't defend a traffic cone.
Good grief.
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Curmudgeon wrote:He_Got_Game wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:Why does anyone think that Simons will help the Celtics win games?
Because he's an explosive athlete and can score in all 3 levels.
He can't defend a traffic cone.
GoCeltics123 wrote:Jay King:A league source told The Athletic the Jazz are getting the better of Cleveland’s or Boston’s 2031 second-round pick and the better of Boston’s or Orlando’s 2027 second-round pick in the deal.The addition of Luis could be an ominous sign for the returning Miles Norris, though a team source said his future has yet to be determined.
redslastlaugh wrote:Are we still in cost cutting mode? Because Moody has a few years left.
I don't watch that much GSW being that they're on the west coast and being that they beat us in the Finals. but whenever I catch them, I always cant shake the comp of Josh Richardson for Moody. Based on limited watches, I see the comparison in terms of an adequate NBA 2/3 who does some nice things but is fundamentally fungible and whose destiny is probably as a salary match for a more memorable player165bows wrote:No one's pitched any fake trades in awhile so how about Niang/Walsh/Tillman for Moses Moody.
Don't want to get too rusty on the ol' trade fabrication creation.
bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:The suckitude of this off-season is breathtaking to behold.
But good news, the Patriots start up Friday and the Red Sox may win the World Series and are absolutely stacked with young talent.
So if Corporal Chisholm and the other Venture Capitalists wannabees want to gut this team, there are sports alternatives....
Gant wrote:It's clear there's more to come. If nothing else the two-way logjam needs to be addressed with Williams, Shulga, Luis and Norris vying for some sort of employment.
It would not be surprising if another center was added as the big man position still needs help. The Boucher acquisition looks like the opposite of a tanking move. If a center or two emerges, this could be a passably decent team.
He_Got_Game wrote:On another note, I have no expectations for wins and losses this year which is kind of great. It's good to take a year off from all the worry and anxiety and just watch your favorite team play.
jfs1000d wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:The suckitude of this off-season is breathtaking to behold.
But good news, the Patriots start up Friday and the Red Sox may win the World Series and are absolutely stacked with young talent.
So if Corporal Chisholm and the other Venture Capitalists wannabees want to gut this team, there are sports alternatives....
It is for sure he year. Foolish to go over second apron. Duck all taxes if you can. Reset the penalties.
jmr07019 wrote:djFan71 wrote:brackdan70 wrote:Hmm. A lot happened today when I wasn’t paying attention.
That seems like a lot of draft capital to move Niang, but I am not too offended.
Love adding Boucher. He is really a positive impact player. That wasn’t on my radar.
The tank just threw a track.
I think it's one 2nd to dump Niang, the other to get RJ Luis. I don't love sending them, but that's why Brad gets em.
I don't think the sidegrade really effects the tank one way or the other, tbh. Purely financial, with maybe the slightest on court improvement due to fit, than anything else.
Why sign Boucher though? He’s roughly equal to Niang but he’s better than an UDFA rookie or an empty roster spot.
31to6 wrote:jfs1000d wrote:bigfoot_cryptozoology wrote:The suckitude of this off-season is breathtaking to behold.
But good news, the Patriots start up Friday and the Red Sox may win the World Series and are absolutely stacked with young talent.
So if Corporal Chisholm and the other Venture Capitalists wannabees want to gut this team, there are sports alternatives....
It is for sure he year. Foolish to go over second apron. Duck all taxes if you can. Reset the penalties.
I'm a broken record about this this summer, but want to make sure everyone remembers that luxury tax penalties are purely financial, and not tied up with draft picks and trade restrictions, like the aprons. So if the goal becomes getting under the luxury tax (especially for the next two seasons), then the goal is just for the new owners to save $$, likely at the expense of competitiveness in 2026-27 and beyond.
brackdan70 wrote:jmr07019 wrote:djFan71 wrote:I think it's one 2nd to dump Niang, the other to get RJ Luis. I don't love sending them, but that's why Brad gets em.
I don't think the sidegrade really effects the tank one way or the other, tbh. Purely financial, with maybe the slightest on court improvement due to fit, than anything else.
Why sign Boucher though? He’s roughly equal to Niang but he’s better than an UDFA rookie or an empty roster spot.
Based on impact stats he is way better than Niang.
jmr07019 wrote:Why sign Boucher though? He’s roughly equal to Niang but he’s better than an UDFA rookie or an empty roster spot.
Hal14 wrote:31to6 wrote:jfs1000d wrote:
It is for sure he year. Foolish to go over second apron. Duck all taxes if you can. Reset the penalties.
I'm a broken record about this this summer, but want to make sure everyone remembers that luxury tax penalties are purely financial, and not tied up with draft picks and trade restrictions, like the aprons. So if the goal becomes getting under the luxury tax (especially for the next two seasons), then the goal is just for the new owners to save $$, likely at the expense of competitiveness in 2026-27 and beyond.
It's for the owners to save $ now (during a season we're punting) so they can use that money they save to spend more $ on improving the team in 26-27 and beyond when Tatum is back healthy and we're actually trying to win titles again.
djFan71 wrote:Fierce1 wrote:djFan71 wrote:I can probably go lower. Gimme a few days.
I think MIL owes a pick here, but they just don't have any. I like a secondary swap on the 28 first round pick, tbh. We should be good again, so upgrading from 28-30 to something slightly higher isn't nothing.
I would agree with you if Ainge is still calling the shots for the Cs.
But Brad apparently does not care about picks.
Guess we'll just have to wait for Sep. 7.
I still think Simons will end up playing for the Celtics.
Raise Simons' trade value then trade him for something significant.
I think the last part is what I don't get. Even if he plays a lot better in BOS than he has the rest of his career and scores more efficiently, shows progress on D, you've used up even more of his contract as an expiring. Any value he's added is offset by that. At the deadline, someone would need to:
a) be so much more enamored with Simons than they are now
b) feel like that's worth giving up something significant rather than wait for FA in the summer - where more teams will have space than this summer.
c) negotiate an extension at the time of the trade, or feel very confident they could resign him.
It's possible but pretty unlikely, imo.
Parliament10 wrote:So. let me get this Straight.
Did we just Trade for a Two-Way player, in Luis, Jr.?
playa-hater wrote:So now that we signed Chris Boucher, I am wondering if that leaves us out of the great Ben Simmons race???
Other than straight tanking and playing the young guys I'm not even sure what I want anymore.