Fierce1 wrote:Who do you think wins if it's a team of 5 Ben Simmons vs. a team of 5 Anfernee Simons?
There will be a point during that game where it's 5 on 4

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Fierce1 wrote:Who do you think wins if it's a team of 5 Ben Simmons vs. a team of 5 Anfernee Simons?
zoyathedestroya wrote:Stevens not doing JB any favors with the supporting cast he surrounded him with. Gimpy JT, Boucher, Hugsie, etc?!
Can’t wait for all the “the Celtics will surprise a lot of people” articles during training camp.
165bows wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:Everyone keeps talking offense, offense, offense and completely ignores the Celtics unit of Pritchard, White, Brown, Hauser, Simons, Scheierman, Boucher, Queta, Garza etc. is going to be the worst defensive team the Celtics have had in a decade. 38 wins if everyone stays healthy.
Pacers were never a defensive team last season and they made it to the Finals.
They ended up with 50 wins even if they're giving up 115 ppg last season.
50 wins is not that many and overwhelmingly frequently not a title contender
Dogen wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Stevens not doing JB any favors with the supporting cast he surrounded him with. Gimpy JT, Boucher, Hugsie, etc?!
Can’t wait for all the “the Celtics will surprise a lot of people” articles during training camp.
I think those stories will be a thing, and maybe not unfounded. Can the team still sign Horford, maybe move Tillman and another player? Big IF Tatum can return in 2026, but basically ending up with this team in March:
Horford
Tatum
Brown
White
Pritchard
w/Simons, Hauser as 6th-7th men for scoring punch
Boucher, Queta Garza, some size off the bench
Scheierman as the utility ball habdler, scorer when needed.
Walsh, Minott, Hugo the hungry younguns.
165bows wrote:Dogen wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:Stevens not doing JB any favors with the supporting cast he surrounded him with. Gimpy JT, Boucher, Hugsie, etc?!
Can’t wait for all the “the Celtics will surprise a lot of people” articles during training camp.
I think those stories will be a thing, and maybe not unfounded. Can the team still sign Horford, maybe move Tillman and another player? Big IF Tatum can return in 2026, but basically ending up with this team in March:
Horford
Tatum
Brown
White
Pritchard
w/Simons, Hauser as 6th-7th men for scoring punch
Boucher, Queta Garza, some size off the bench
Scheierman as the utility ball habdler, scorer when needed.
Walsh, Minott, Hugo the hungry younguns.
Doesn't sound like Tatum's playing this year at all. That team would be competitive but not in the cards.
Fierce1 wrote:If this is just about money and tanking, the Celtics absolutely DID NOT HAVE TO SIGN Boucher.
After the Niang trade, Brad could just have easily signed Amari to a regular contract.
But Brad didn't do that.
Since 2013-14, Brad has never been a tanker.
ddb wrote:Fierce1 wrote:If this is just about money and tanking, the Celtics absolutely DID NOT HAVE TO SIGN Boucher.
After the Niang trade, Brad could just have easily signed Amari to a regular contract.
But Brad didn't do that.
Since 2013-14, Brad has never been a tanker.
Correct. They will not be tanking for those who want them to. They will look to win and be firmly in the playoffs.
Only chance we see a tank job is if JB or White go down for an extended period. At which point if they fall far enough behind, I could see the C's shutting down JB or White and just punting entirely on the season.
Fierce1 wrote:165bows wrote:Dogen wrote:
I think those stories will be a thing, and maybe not unfounded. Can the team still sign Horford, maybe move Tillman and another player? Big IF Tatum can return in 2026, but basically ending up with this team in March:
Horford
Tatum
Brown
White
Pritchard
w/Simons, Hauser as 6th-7th men for scoring punch
Boucher, Queta Garza, some size off the bench
Scheierman as the utility ball habdler, scorer when needed.
Walsh, Minott, Hugo the hungry younguns.
Doesn't sound like Tatum's playing this year at all. That team would be competitive but not in the cards.
Guess you have not read the articles about why Tatum can return this season.
Celts17Pride wrote:ddb wrote:Fierce1 wrote:If this is just about money and tanking, the Celtics absolutely DID NOT HAVE TO SIGN Boucher.
After the Niang trade, Brad could just have easily signed Amari to a regular contract.
But Brad didn't do that.
Since 2013-14, Brad has never been a tanker.
Correct. They will not be tanking for those who want them to. They will look to win and be firmly in the playoffs.
Only chance we see a tank job is if JB or White go down for an extended period. At which point if they fall far enough behind, I could see the C's shutting down JB or White and just punting entirely on the season.
Celtics don't tank. I've been a fan since 1976 and there has only been one time that the Celtics have tanked and that was with ML Carr and they were tanking for Tim Duncan. There is a difference though with a team not having enough talent to win. Stevens has given the Celtics a chance and they could surprise but this Celtics team as currently constructed is a high 30's win team. The new Atlanta Hawks.
165bows wrote:Fierce1 wrote:165bows wrote:Doesn't sound like Tatum's playing this year at all. That team would be competitive but not in the cards.
Guess you have not read the articles about why Tatum can return this season.
Not to spoon feed but that's what the sauces say idk what else to tell you
phincsfan wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Who do you think wins if it's a team of 5 Ben Simmons vs. a team of 5 Anfernee Simons?
There will be a point during that game where it's 5 on 4
colincb wrote:Boucher's career PER, rebounds per 36, ORating, and Net Rating are significantly better than Niang's. His defensive stats are better, too.
Boucher's not just cheaper, but is a better player and a better fit. He's a plus player, unlike Niang (or Simons).
Fierce1 wrote:31to6 wrote:Fierce1 wrote:This will depend on how JB plays as the #1 option.
If JB plays well, 45-50 wins is possible.
Before the signing of Boucher, I had the Cs as a #6 seed.
Now I think a 4 seed is truly possible.
The Cs needed frontcourt help, Brad got one.
It's the little things.
I like Boucher, but I feel like you are over rating him. Do you see him as a quality starter at the 4 or 5? Would you be willing to predict how many GP, mpg, rpg, bpg, and ppg we'll see in green from 32 year old Chris Boucher?
I think Boucher can be a 12 ppg, 7 rpg, and 1 bpg player in 28 minutes of game action for the Cs.
Boucher is playing for his next contract, so I won't be surprised if he really plays well for the Cs.
Fierce1 wrote:A starting unit of IT, Avery Bradley, Jae Crowder, Horford, and Amir Johnson ended up winning 53 games in 2016-17.
I find it hard to believe this season's Celtics with JB and White will only win 30+ games.
Some complain about Simons being small.
How about IT at 5-9 and Bradley at 6-2?
Celts17Pride wrote:165bows wrote:Fierce1 wrote:Guess you have not read the articles about why Tatum can return this season.
Not to spoon feed but that's what the sauces say idk what else to tell you
Tatum won't be back this year. Makes zero sense. Maybe a late season cameo in the last half dozen games, but I even doubt that.