Daddy 801 wrote:parsnips33 wrote:Is Niang gettable or is he probably staying in Utah? He seems Kerr-y
A third of the roster is gettable in Utah.
Wouldn't surprise if he's got some more modest value later this year.
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Daddy 801 wrote:parsnips33 wrote:Is Niang gettable or is he probably staying in Utah? He seems Kerr-y
A third of the roster is gettable in Utah.
jayjaysee wrote:SkyHook wrote:jayjaysee wrote:I know it’s too late and Utah probably never uses more than 18 million of the TPE anyways but.. could Utah trade Love for a player making below 5 mil (what’s left of TPE) and use Love’s salary to match Niang? Just to make us/me happy?
Say
Powell+Niang+Prosper+Dallas cash+Boston 2nds to Utah
Love to Dallas
That trims the money needed for Exum. And Love might/could give some minutes as a spacing big?
Or something similar with a team that could use a spot minute big?..
Or
Kyle Anderson to Sac
Saric+Niang+Sac second+Boston 2nds to Utah
Love for Powell + OMP works as a standard trade without Utah tapping into the balance of their NTMLE or any of their TPEs. Cash alone might get it done, but I imagine that the Jazz would want at least one SRP in return, given that they expect to shed most of Love's salary in a buyout.
I like the SAC deal as it preserves the entire Collins TPE.
They both should preserve the entire TPE, only reason Utah look at them. Utah still has part of the MLE and a smaller TPE to split the Dallas contracts in as.
I doubt Dallas has any interest in paying anything of real value for that deal though. Cash is about all imo.
Celts17Pride wrote:Snakebites wrote:Given the circumstances the Celtics have done a decent job.
Can’t imagine too many Celtics fans are excited about this offseason, but these incremental cuts to minimize the cost of cutting salary were the right move.
Celtics fans are excited about 2026/2027. High draft pick, two big TPEs, big spending again. 2025/2026 necessary gap year.
165bows wrote:oldncreaky wrote:I'm a bit surprised that it was Boston who got Boucher on a vet min deal. Thought he'd be a much better fit as a depth piece (9th man) on a contender.
He's been inconsistent his entire career, and you don't want to have to rely on him in your top 7. However, if he comes in and hits a couple shots, he can get hot, play impact D, block shots, and tilt a game. On Boston, he just might win them a few games they'd rather lose -- as he did in TOR before he was benched to help the tank.
There's been a couple of low key reports they have liked him over the past couple of years, seemed like a guy that might land eventually. He porbably gets as many minutes as he can handle and then either plays well and gets dealt or gets a bigger deal next year. Or maybe he ends up as depth in 26/27 when Tatum is back.
Kind of a win/win imo except unless he does as you say wins too many games.
Return to Trades and Transactions