ImageImageImageImageImage

Collin Murray-Boyles Thread

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer

User avatar
Westside Gunn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,727
And1: 6,655
Joined: Jul 03, 2016
       

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#361 » by Westside Gunn » Fri Aug 8, 2025 8:52 am

Thaddy wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Thaddy wrote:He can't hit the corner 3. He needs to refine that in a situation where he'll get shots. We won't start him over RJ because of politics and trade value reasons. Is that easy enough to understand?

Lol we are not gonna bench CMB and start RJ because of "politics".

RJ was not drafted by our team, nor has he been extended, nor is our president even the same as when we acquired him.

If we want to bring RJ off the bench... we will. And that will be that.

RJ is a addition by subtraction player that no one wants. If we bench him we are essentially stuck with him or will need to attach picks to get off his contract.

We tried offering 9th and RJ for Holiday and were told to screw off. That's pretty eye opening. We aren't competitive and unless CMB or another bench player makes us much better in combination with our other starters RJ will start and it's 100% about trade value.

The only way we get better now is from trades. Internally developing a bunch of 2nd rounders isn't getting us far.


That "toxic asset" reputation has stuck with him to this day i guess
Google "Hind Rajab"
Total Killed by Israel = 50,000+
Israel kills a child every 45 minutes and ban aid workers from bringing in baby formula :crazy:
Total being starved by Israel = 500,000 -1,000,000

Speak up
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,239
And1: 13,854
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#362 » by Los_29 » Fri Aug 8, 2025 9:07 am

Thaddy wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Thaddy wrote:He can't hit the corner 3. He needs to refine that in a situation where he'll get shots. We won't start him over RJ because of politics and trade value reasons. Is that easy enough to understand?

Lol we are not gonna bench CMB and start RJ because of "politics".

RJ was not drafted by our team, nor has he been extended, nor is our president even the same as when we acquired him.

If we want to bring RJ off the bench... we will. And that will be that.

RJ is a addition by subtraction player that no one wants. If we bench him we are essentially stuck with him or will need to attach picks to get off his contract.

We tried offering 9th and RJ for Holiday and were told to screw off. That's pretty eye opening. We aren't competitive and unless CMB or another bench player makes us much better in combination with our other starters RJ will start and it's 100% about trade value.

The only way we get better now is from trades. Internally developing a bunch of 2nd rounders isn't getting us far.


lol we didn’t offer the 9th pick and RJ for Jrue Holiday. Let’s try to use common sense here.
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 12,651
And1: 12,093
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#363 » by Tripod » Fri Aug 8, 2025 12:22 pm

Westside Gunn wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:Lol we are not gonna bench CMB and start RJ because of "politics".

RJ was not drafted by our team, nor has he been extended, nor is our president even the same as when we acquired him.

If we want to bring RJ off the bench... we will. And that will be that.

RJ is a addition by subtraction player that no one wants. If we bench him we are essentially stuck with him or will need to attach picks to get off his contract.

We tried offering 9th and RJ for Holiday and were told to screw off. That's pretty eye opening. We aren't competitive and unless CMB or another bench player makes us much better in combination with our other starters RJ will start and it's 100% about trade value.

The only way we get better now is from trades. Internally developing a bunch of 2nd rounders isn't getting us far.


That "toxic asset" reputation has stuck with him to this day i guess

That actually didn't happen.

We offered it for White and it somehow got changed for Holiday.

Unless people REALLY think Boston would rather Simmons vs RJ+9. Yes Boston wants to cut money but they would gladly take the extra year to add a top 10 pick.

Use common sense.
User avatar
dTox
RealGM
Posts: 16,230
And1: 17,382
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Location: Basement
   

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#364 » by dTox » Fri Aug 8, 2025 12:41 pm

It was for White, not Holiday
Image
FREE PALESTINE
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,115
And1: 32,909
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#365 » by YogurtProducer » Fri Aug 8, 2025 1:18 pm

dTox wrote:It was for White, not Holiday

I swore some of the rumours had both included
What an absolute failure and disaster this franchise is, ran by one of the most incompetent front offices in the league.
- Raptors RealGM Forum re: Masai Ujiri - June 2023
User avatar
dTox
RealGM
Posts: 16,230
And1: 17,382
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Location: Basement
   

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#366 » by dTox » Fri Aug 8, 2025 1:37 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
dTox wrote:It was for White, not Holiday

I swore some of the rumours had both included


Depends on how credible you think Jake Fisher is I suppose.
Image
FREE PALESTINE
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,807
And1: 5,489
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#367 » by Yallbecrazy » Fri Aug 8, 2025 9:21 pm

dTox wrote:It was for White, not Holiday



It also could have been dependent on who was available. Maybe they liked CMB or someone who went ahead of CMB and wouldn't have done the deal unless those guys were picked ahead of #9.
User avatar
MEDIC
RealGM
Posts: 20,450
And1: 11,180
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#368 » by MEDIC » Fri Aug 8, 2025 9:39 pm

So what does everyone think of a PF with Julius Randle offense & Draymond Green defense & IQ?

Are people happy with that as a ceiling?
Image
* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
Basketball_Jones
RealGM
Posts: 30,629
And1: 17,936
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
     

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#369 » by Basketball_Jones » Fri Aug 8, 2025 11:41 pm

MEDIC wrote:So what does everyone think of a PF with Julius Randle offense & Draymond Green defense & IQ?

Are people happy with that as a ceiling?


That’s pretty close to superstar lol
2019 Eastern Conference All Stars

Derozan
Lowry
Ibaka
Valanciunas
Van Vleet
Delon Wright
Lebron
Embiid

There are only 2 teams in the league that rank in the top 6 in offensive and defensive efficiency: the Golden State Warriors and the Toronto Raptors.
canada_dry
General Manager
Posts: 9,032
And1: 7,073
Joined: Aug 22, 2017

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#370 » by canada_dry » Fri Aug 8, 2025 11:59 pm

Prime thad young with even better defense?

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,294
And1: 14,188
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#371 » by Godaddycurse » Sat Aug 9, 2025 12:19 am

canada_dry wrote:Prime thad young with even better defense?

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app

Read on Twitter
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,581
And1: 10,948
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#372 » by DreamTeam09 » Sat Aug 9, 2025 12:57 am

canada_dry wrote:Prime thad young with even better defense?

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app


Prime Thad young 15 9 1ast 1.4stl / age 27 or 17 n 6 2ast 2stl / age 25
One yr was on 30% from 3 the other was on the mid 20s

CMB projects to be a better passer & more stocks, more versatile on defense

Not a bad take by any means tho
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
canada_dry
General Manager
Posts: 9,032
And1: 7,073
Joined: Aug 22, 2017

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#373 » by canada_dry » Sat Aug 9, 2025 1:22 am

DreamTeam09 wrote:
canada_dry wrote:Prime thad young with even better defense?

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app


Prime Thad young 15 9 1ast 1.4stl / age 27 or 17 n 6 2ast 2stl / age 25
One yr was on 30% from 3 the other was on the mid 20s

CMB projects to be a better passer & more stocks, more versatile on defense

Not a bad take by any means tho
More of a floor.

6'8 240 forward plays strong , active hands defensively with a iffy jumper.

I know its not a sexy comp compared to the names being thrown out... but it might be a lot more realistic than some of the HOF comps where we're just creating a Frankenstein player using the best attributes of each HOF player CMB is being compared to ... :)

EDIT: I mean i AM adding more defense to my comp so im not immune from it either i guess :)

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
earthtone
Junior
Posts: 477
And1: 575
Joined: Nov 25, 2024
     

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#374 » by earthtone » Sat Aug 9, 2025 1:54 am

Westside Gunn wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:Lol we are not gonna bench CMB and start RJ because of "politics".

RJ was not drafted by our team, nor has he been extended, nor is our president even the same as when we acquired him.

If we want to bring RJ off the bench... we will. And that will be that.

RJ is a addition by subtraction player that no one wants. If we bench him we are essentially stuck with him or will need to attach picks to get off his contract.

We tried offering 9th and RJ for Holiday and were told to screw off. That's pretty eye opening. We aren't competitive and unless CMB or another bench player makes us much better in combination with our other starters RJ will start and it's 100% about trade value.

The only way we get better now is from trades. Internally developing a bunch of 2nd rounders isn't getting us far.


That "toxic asset" reputation has stuck with him to this day i guess

The toxic asset “reputation” is so overblown, out of context, and really not applicable after what he’s shown in his year & half as a Raptor.

Full context was:
”…I've always said if there's a continuum of RJ Barrett optimism and pessimism and over here on the pessimistic side is like 'He just stinks. He's a toxic asset.' That is a word that got thrown out yesterday in my conversations with front office people and coaches. Toxic asset. Like you're swallowing his contract.

To, on the other end, future All-Star RJ Barrett. I'm like in the 68th percentile toward positive. Maybe the 73rd percentile toward positive. I think RJ Barrett has a chance to be a good NBA player. And, in fact, has been for large stretches of his career.”


This was before he doubled his assist rate and became a positive player by advanced metrics for the first time in his career.
User avatar
CPT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,427
And1: 2,971
Joined: Jan 21, 2002
Location: Osaka/Seoul/Toronto
         

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#375 » by CPT » Sat Aug 9, 2025 4:30 am

MEDIC wrote:So what does everyone think of a PF with Julius Randle offense & Draymond Green defense & IQ?

Are people happy with that as a ceiling?


That’s like a top 50 all-time player, so okay, I guess.
Harcore Fenton Mun
RealGM
Posts: 14,338
And1: 8,435
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#376 » by Harcore Fenton Mun » Sat Aug 9, 2025 5:04 am

I don't know if it's just the 7'1" reach. But he looks a lot like Kawhi on the defensive end.
Image
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,765
And1: 3,944
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#377 » by Thaddy » Sat Aug 9, 2025 6:02 am

ConSarnit wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote: :lol:

Yes, because obviously GMs are to stupid to properly evaluate players and only look to if a player is a starter or a bench player.

That just isn’t how the league works. There’s also the entire other side of the coin where we use RJ off the bench, he has a career year in a better fitting role, and his value increases.

It’s not like teams will refuse to trade for a productive bench piece :lol:

What 28M dollar bench pieces do you see in the league with positive trade value :lol:


Don’t you see how your argument makes no sense? Here’s what you’ve argued:

1) RJ has no trade value in part because of the rumored Jrue deal. This lack of value was determined from RJ BEING A STARTER

2) RJ will have no value if RJ comes off the bench

You’ve already said RJ has no value as a starter. Why would it then matter if we brought him off the bench?

According to you he has no value as a starter or bench player so why does it matter where we play him?

Keeping him as a starter and hoping he improves and continues to look better is the best chance of maximizing his trade value. There's a slight possibility that can happen. Benching him will kill his confidence similar to what happened with GTJ. It makes a ton of sense.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,115
And1: 32,909
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#378 » by YogurtProducer » Sat Aug 9, 2025 1:10 pm

Thaddy wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
Thaddy wrote:What 28M dollar bench pieces do you see in the league with positive trade value :lol:


Don’t you see how your argument makes no sense? Here’s what you’ve argued:

1) RJ has no trade value in part because of the rumored Jrue deal. This lack of value was determined from RJ BEING A STARTER

2) RJ will have no value if RJ comes off the bench

You’ve already said RJ has no value as a starter. Why would it then matter if we brought him off the bench?

According to you he has no value as a starter or bench player so why does it matter where we play him?

Keeping him as a starter and hoping he improves and continues to look better is the best chance of maximizing his trade value. There's a slight possibility that can happen. Benching him will kill his confidence similar to what happened with GTJ. It makes a ton of sense.

GTJ was a more efficient player off the bench in 2022/23, and was more efficient ass a starter in 2023/24.

There’s no real evidence we “killed GTJs confidence”.
What an absolute failure and disaster this franchise is, ran by one of the most incompetent front offices in the league.
- Raptors RealGM Forum re: Masai Ujiri - June 2023
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,484
And1: 23,711
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#379 » by ATLTimekeeper » Sat Aug 9, 2025 2:11 pm

Yallbecrazy wrote:
dTox wrote:It was for White, not Holiday


It also could have been dependent on who was available. Maybe they liked CMB or someone who went ahead of CMB and wouldn't have done the deal unless those guys were picked ahead of #9.


Holiday ended up being damaged goods, so the deal would have been rescinded if that was the offer. It's easier to return 2nds than someone that has already been drafted for another team.

Given the framing of the White rumour, it sounds more like the kind of thing Zach Lowe writes to carry water for his Celtics' buddies. When he writes stuff like, 'hung up laughing' it's someone telling him to print exactly that and it portrays White's value artificially high to the league. Why would anyone give up a top 10 pick for Derrick White at his $$$ and age? Masai was chasing Giannis and Durant, and as soon as Giannis said he was staying with the Bucks he was officially fired by Pelley. The Raptors reportedly wouldn't give up Poeltl for Durant. But they would give up #9 for White? Doesn't seem believable.

Given that we didn't entertain the Pelicans offer, I think the Raptors were probably uninterested in trading this pick once Masai was removed from the decision-making process. The Suns war room leak gives an inside view that we weren't looking at Maluach at all. They must have had a very good idea that CMB would be there.
Basketball_Jones
RealGM
Posts: 30,629
And1: 17,936
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
     

Re: Collin Murray-Boyles Thread 

Post#380 » by Basketball_Jones » Sat Aug 9, 2025 2:15 pm

Honestly, if it was Masai wanting to trade the pick and RJ for Derrick White I’m pretty glad he’s gone lol. Celtics probably should have done it too if true and they are punting this season.
2019 Eastern Conference All Stars

Derozan
Lowry
Ibaka
Valanciunas
Van Vleet
Delon Wright
Lebron
Embiid

There are only 2 teams in the league that rank in the top 6 in offensive and defensive efficiency: the Golden State Warriors and the Toronto Raptors.

Return to Toronto Raptors