Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Poll

Hakeem
23
100%
Webber
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 23

SHAQ32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,587
And1: 3,259
Joined: Mar 21, 2013
 

Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#1 » by SHAQ32 » Sat Aug 9, 2025 11:55 pm

Title
Ol Roy
Senior
Posts: 538
And1: 603
Joined: Dec 03, 2023

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#2 » by Ol Roy » Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:14 am

As Jordan said, Olajuwon was a small forward playing center.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,362
And1: 9,913
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#3 » by penbeast0 » Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:17 am

And Webber was a 2 guard playing the 4 (and no, that's not a compliment). It's probably Hakeem for the lower body strength since court vision, the main area that Webber started out considerably better than Hakeem, isn't considered athleticism per se.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,249
And1: 5,615
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#4 » by One_and_Done » Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:42 am

'Who was the better athlete', whatever that means, is generally used as a distraction from who the better player was. In this case though the answer to both is clearly Hakeem.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Tomtolbert
Sophomore
Posts: 229
And1: 250
Joined: Aug 08, 2011

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#5 » by Tomtolbert » Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:19 am

Olajuwon.

Webber wasn't far behind - he had a scary combination of power and quickness. But his limited footwork, post game, and defensive awareness prevented him from being an all time great.
Peregrine01
Head Coach
Posts: 6,711
And1: 7,634
Joined: Sep 12, 2012

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#6 » by Peregrine01 » Sun Aug 10, 2025 11:26 am

I struggle to think of a single physical advantage that Webber had over Hakeem.
SHAQ32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,587
And1: 3,259
Joined: Mar 21, 2013
 

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#7 » by SHAQ32 » Mon Aug 11, 2025 5:21 am

Peregrine01 wrote:I struggle to think of a single physical advantage that Webber had over Hakeem.

Agility relative to height and weight
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,230
And1: 31,815
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#8 » by tsherkin » Mon Aug 11, 2025 10:48 pm

SHAQ32 wrote:
Peregrine01 wrote:I struggle to think of a single physical advantage that Webber had over Hakeem.

Agility relative to height and weight


That definitely wasn't an advantage for Webber over Hakeem.
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 7,432
And1: 3,413
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#9 » by parsnips33 » Mon Aug 11, 2025 11:42 pm

One_and_Done wrote:'Who was the better athlete', whatever that means, is generally used as a distraction from who the better player was. In this case though the answer to both is clearly Hakeem.


What makes this a "distraction" versus just a completely different question? :lol:
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,230
And1: 31,815
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#10 » by tsherkin » Tue Aug 12, 2025 1:40 pm

parsnips33 wrote:What makes this a "distraction" versus just a completely different question? :lol:


Stepping away from the "distraction" element, while I can't really see an argument for Webber here, it is at least an opportunity to discuss how athletic he was early on in his career before the injuries began to take it away from him. He had a nice first step and good coordination, solid elevation. Really nice spin. He was definitely an impressive athlete.
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 42,791
And1: 6,232
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#11 » by Harry Palmer » Thu Aug 14, 2025 9:10 am

Webber himself says Hakeem’s athleticism shocked him. Too many people think of Hakeem’s peak as post 30, when his athleticism had at least come down to ~ mortal levels, but the Hakeem who hit the league like a storm and threatened competitive balance before Sampson’s knee was predominantly talked about as an athletic phenomenon coupled with major intensity/competitiveness. No one ever had (or ever would) see a man that big and STRONG who could move with that much quickness, speed, agility, balance and breaks. Robinson was probably a better linear athlete, but it’s closer than most realize..pre-decline Hakeem could get UP…but in any of the other kinds of athleticism, particularly integrated and motor skills, Hakeem was in a different league. Think stronger, more explosive KG with better quickness, balance and eye-hand coordination.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,036
And1: 25,343
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#12 » by 70sFan » Thu Aug 14, 2025 10:14 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:Webber himself says Hakeem’s athleticism shocked him. Too many people think of Hakeem’s peak as post 30, when his athleticism had at least come down to ~ mortal levels, but the Hakeem who hit the league like a storm and threatened competitive balance before Sampson’s knee was predominantly talked about as an athletic phenomenon coupled with major intensity/competitiveness. No one ever had (or ever would) see a man that big and STRONG who could move with that much quickness, speed, agility, balance and breaks. Robinson was probably a better linear athlete, but it’s closer than most realize..pre-decline Hakeem could get UP…but in any of the other kinds of athleticism, particularly integrated and motor skills, Hakeem was in a different league. Think stronger, more explosive KG with better quickness, balance and eye-hand coordination.

I always thought Hakeem and Russell are perfect physical comparison. Similar size, similar explosiveness and body control, similar versatility. Hakeem had a bit more core strength, Bill had more vertical athleticism.
ChiTown6rings
Ballboy
Posts: 42
And1: 16
Joined: Apr 22, 2014
 

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#13 » by ChiTown6rings » Fri Aug 15, 2025 12:42 am

C Webb was never the athlete that Hakeem was.
Ol Roy
Senior
Posts: 538
And1: 603
Joined: Dec 03, 2023

Re: Better athlete upon entering the league - Hakeem or Chris Webber 

Post#14 » by Ol Roy » Fri Aug 15, 2025 2:06 am

Harry Palmer wrote:Webber himself says Hakeem’s athleticism shocked him. Too many people think of Hakeem’s peak as post 30, when his athleticism had at least come down to ~ mortal levels, but the Hakeem who hit the league like a storm and threatened competitive balance before Sampson’s knee was predominantly talked about as an athletic phenomenon coupled with major intensity/competitiveness. No one ever had (or ever would) see a man that big and STRONG who could move with that much quickness, speed, agility, balance and breaks. Robinson was probably a better linear athlete, but it’s closer than most realize..pre-decline Hakeem could get UP…but in any of the other kinds of athleticism, particularly integrated and motor skills, Hakeem was in a different league. Think stronger, more explosive KG with better quickness, balance and eye-hand coordination.


Exactly. People who only watch 94/95 Hakeem are really missing out.

Return to Player Comparisons