HornetJail wrote:SkyHook wrote:HornetJail wrote:where does "ridiculously inefficient" come from? He has a career 101 TS+ , and at rock bottom (this year), he was 98 TS+. A couple more turnovers than you'd like, but not atypical for someone with his usage.
His raw FG% is low, but actual points per possession is right on league average, and usually higher. If Trae is "ridiculously inefficient", then so are about 50-60% of guards across the NBA.
I'd be far more comfortably giving Trae a max compared to De'Aaron Fox who already received one, for instance.
In only two of his seven seasons has his league adjusted eFG% been anywhere near even average. The last three seasons have been at 89, 94, and 90. His TS% gets propped up because he's a foul merchant, consistently among the highest FT attempts, but yet another reason to be concerned with any drop off in his speed. He's a fine passer but with a middling sub-2.5 AST/TO ratio.
Fox's max was a huge mistake on the part of the Spurs, imo. Trae's would be nearly as bad.
free throws are part of scoring efficiency whether you want to use an incomplete stat like EFG% or not. His FTR doesn't fall off by much in the playoffs either, so the people screeching about " the refs won't call fouls in the playoffs" don't have much to stand on there either.
We just saw arguably the league's most notorious "foul merchant" lead his team to the title; it might be time to put the "refs don't call fouls in the POs" argument to rest.

























