WNBA expansion

Moderators: cupcakesnake, G R E Y, Doctor MJ

User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,985
And1: 59,762
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#61 » by DOT » Thu Aug 7, 2025 2:03 pm

hermes wrote:why would the league be so set on having a team in houston?

Officially, because the Houston Comets are kind of the original team

Yeah the Sparks, Mercury, and Liberty have been there since the beginning as well, but Houston won the first 4 finals and only had 2 losing seasons in their 12 years around

They're kind of iconic

Unofficially, it feels like a backroom deal made between Cathy Engelbert and Tilman Fertitta after he lost out on his expansion bid.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,916
And1: 52,653
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#62 » by MrDollarBills » Thu Aug 7, 2025 2:40 pm

DOT wrote:
hermes wrote:why would the league be so set on having a team in houston?

Officially, because the Houston Comets are kind of the original team

Yeah the Sparks, Mercury, and Liberty have been there since the beginning as well, but Houston won the first 4 finals and only had 2 losing seasons in their 12 years around

They're kind of iconic

Unofficially, it feels like a backroom deal made between Cathy Engelbert and Tilman Fertitta after he lost out on his expansion bid.


Yep. Exactly.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
ellobo
Veteran
Posts: 2,923
And1: 4,815
Joined: Aug 06, 2017

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#63 » by ellobo » Thu Aug 7, 2025 3:34 pm

The Sun are in an unusual situation because: 1. It's being sold during a period of ongoing expansion. 2. The team will be relocated regardless of who buys it. 3. Boston is an attractive future expansion city, whereas Hartford would never get approved for a completely new franchise, but the two markets are probably too close to support two different teams, plus a Hartford relocation makes Boston less attractive for expansion.

The league obviously does not want the team sold to a group or relocated to a city that isn't in the pipeline for an expansion franchise. Boston is not currently in that pipeline, and a Hartford move would probably block expansion to Boston in the future. If expansion weren't in the mix, I don't think there would be nearly the conflict over this sale.

It's a mess because the tribe saved the franchise and has run it successfully, and now it seems they're being treated badly and not being allowed to do what they want (and what's best for themselves) with the team they own.

I'm a native New Yorker and current resident of southwestern CT, a longtime UCONN women's b-ball, and generally sympathetic to the Mohegan tribe's unique ownership role, my sympathies in the current mess are squarely with the tribe to be able to decide the fate of the Sun.

In the bigger picture, I'm afraid the expansion process is going way too fast. It seems like a money grab on the part of the league, and I'm sure most of the new teams are not going to have it together like Golden State. Even if it works fine from a business/marketing/popularity standpoint, from a basketball standpoint I can only see it as a negative, diluting the talent pool and potentially the revenue pool, and disrupting roster continuity (especially with an impending new CBA and free agent free for all). One thing that makes the league interesting this year is that there are really only three doormat teams (the lone expansion team NOT being one of them), and two of them have highly popular and interesting star players. So I'll tune into pretty much any game and find something to hold my attention. I don't expect that to be the case next year.
Just because it happened to you, doesn't make it interesting.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.

Yesterday I was lying; today I'm telling the truth.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,450
And1: 25,494
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#64 » by hermes » Thu Aug 7, 2025 3:58 pm

if they feel so strongly about houston, why didn't they give them a spot over like philadelphia or toronto?
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,985
And1: 59,762
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#65 » by DOT » Thu Aug 7, 2025 4:33 pm

hermes wrote:if they feel so strongly about houston, why didn't they give them a spot over like philadelphia or toronto?

Cause Fertitta couldn't afford it

Reporting is, he was at least $50 million short of the $250 million bids that won, and there was no way to justify giving him a franchise with that big of a gap, not legally at least

So the rumor is he was assuaged by Cathy telling him he could get the Sun on the cheap, but then they were blindsided when both Boston and Hartford offered over $300 million for the team.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,916
And1: 52,653
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#66 » by MrDollarBills » Fri Aug 8, 2025 2:40 pm

Cathy is shady as hell.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
Green Chile
Rookie
Posts: 1,050
And1: 585
Joined: Aug 30, 2024

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#67 » by Green Chile » Sun Aug 10, 2025 12:21 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:Cathy is shady as hell.


Sure, but she's working for the NBA.
Between the Sun sell fiasco, and expansion teams only going to NBA owners, none of it is a good look.

For a variety of reasons, it would be awesome to have a women's professional basketball league that's not owned by the NBA.

I know that won't happen, and don't even know if it should, but what's best for the W may not always be what's best for the NBA owners.
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,985
And1: 59,762
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#68 » by DOT » Wed Aug 13, 2025 1:28 pm

https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/mohegan-connecticut-sun-sale-20813267.php

A Connecticut group, including the state and billionaire Marc Lasry, has exactly matched the reported $325 million bid from Boston to buy the team from its owner of 22 years, the Mohegan tribe, one of the sources said. In that scenario, games would be played at the PeoplesBank Arena in Hartford, previously known as the XL Center.


The state would take on the cost of building a much needed practice facility at a pricetag of about $100 million in or near Hartford, sources said.


The main problem: The league — and by that I mean not just the WNBA but also the NBA, which effectively controls the smaller women's league — is enforcing its right to say where a team that's up for sale can move. And it wants a team in a larger market someplace else.


Multiple people familiar with the talks said all things being equal, and apparently they are, the tribe would prefer to sell to an ownership group that keeps the team in Connecticut. That makes sense because the Mohegan tribe, like the Mashantucket Pequot tribe that owns and operates Foxwoods Resort Casino, takes great pride in its millennia of local roots and in its cooperative relationship with the state.


Image

Literally the only difference would be that the Boston group would be fully financing their practice facility, while CT's would at least partially be owned by the state. But in terms of selling, that should be a non-issue, as it's something new ownership would have to contend with

The only way for the W to avoid litigation at this point is to let the tribe sell to who they want, which at this point would probably be Hartford. They're just shooting themselves in the foot at this point.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,985
And1: 59,762
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#69 » by DOT » Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:46 pm

Also, side note, I keep seeing people on Reddit saying that the tribe agreed to the Boston deal but Cathy didn't put it before the board in time so the exclusivity period ran out, and that's just not true, there was never an agreement with anyone. Pagliuca did submit an official offer, but in his own announcement he said "no transaction has been agreed yet"

It was the Mohegan tribe which let the exclusivity period expire, presumably because they thought (and apparently rightly so) they could get a similar offer from other groups, including one to keep the team in CT which they want to do

Also of note, there's apparently rumors that the CT offer could include a few games at Mohegan each year, which would be free money for the tribe, compared to the Boston deal which would see them play in Providence for a few games a year, due to potential schedule conflicts with the Celtics/Bruins

So if the offers are both equal up front, it makes more sense for the tribe to take the Hartford bid because it's actually more money for them long term, plus they already wanted to keep the team in CT for non-monetary reasons

All in all, it's just absolute bullsh*t what the league is doing. I know we say it's Cathy, but like with everything the commissioner is just a face for the owners, and it's just the owners (who are also MNBA owners) being greedy and not wanting to share the spoils now that the WNBA is profitable. It's a big club, and CT ain't in it apparently.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,916
And1: 52,653
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#70 » by MrDollarBills » Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:47 pm

Green Chile wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:Cathy is shady as hell.


Sure, but she's working for the NBA.
Between the Sun sell fiasco, and expansion teams only going to NBA owners, none of it is a good look.

For a variety of reasons, it would be awesome to have a women's professional basketball league that's not owned by the NBA.

I know that won't happen, and don't even know if it should, but what's best for the W may not always be what's best for the NBA owners.


Seeing that there's clearly some dodgy accounting going on, I agree.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,916
And1: 52,653
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#71 » by MrDollarBills » Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:50 pm

DOT wrote:https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/mohegan-connecticut-sun-sale-20813267.php

A Connecticut group, including the state and billionaire Marc Lasry, has exactly matched the reported $325 million bid from Boston to buy the team from its owner of 22 years, the Mohegan tribe, one of the sources said. In that scenario, games would be played at the PeoplesBank Arena in Hartford, previously known as the XL Center.


The state would take on the cost of building a much needed practice facility at a pricetag of about $100 million in or near Hartford, sources said.


The main problem: The league — and by that I mean not just the WNBA but also the NBA, which effectively controls the smaller women's league — is enforcing its right to say where a team that's up for sale can move. And it wants a team in a larger market someplace else.


Multiple people familiar with the talks said all things being equal, and apparently they are, the tribe would prefer to sell to an ownership group that keeps the team in Connecticut. That makes sense because the Mohegan tribe, like the Mashantucket Pequot tribe that owns and operates Foxwoods Resort Casino, takes great pride in its millennia of local roots and in its cooperative relationship with the state.


Image

Literally the only difference would be that the Boston group would be fully financing their practice facility, while CT's would at least partially be owned by the state. But in terms of selling, that should be a non-issue, as it's something new ownership would have to contend with

The only way for the W to avoid litigation at this point is to let the tribe sell to who they want, which at this point would probably be Hartford. They're just shooting themselves in the foot at this point.



https://rocketswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nba/rockets/2025/08/13/report-wnba-prefers-houston-for-relocation-of-connecticut-sun/85642707007/

I agree, this is the NBA trying to pull some BS with the Rockets ownership group. It's not on Cathy, she's basically the middle man for the NBA.

The Tribe needs to sue the parent company.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,985
And1: 59,762
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#72 » by DOT » Wed Aug 13, 2025 7:55 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:I agree, this is the NBA trying to pull some BS with the Rockets ownership group. It's not on Cathy, she's basically the middle man for the NBA.

The Tribe needs to sue the parent company.

It's just like, okay if Houston legitimately had the money and Fertitta came over the top with an insane offer, I would get it

I would be pissed, but I would get it

He couldn't even afford the $250 million expansion fee, yet I'm to believe he has the $325 million to match the offer plus whatever the WNBA wants for a relocation fee?

Bullsh*t

And you know they don't have it cause there's no rumors of other legit offers, just the two we know about, and it's been weeks at this point. I'm not mad it isn't official yet, the tribe can work on their own time, apparently they haven't even met to properly discuss things, but the longer this goes on without any numbers coming from the Houston side, the more convinced I am they don't have the money.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,916
And1: 52,653
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#73 » by MrDollarBills » Wed Aug 13, 2025 9:11 pm

DOT wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:I agree, this is the NBA trying to pull some BS with the Rockets ownership group. It's not on Cathy, she's basically the middle man for the NBA.

The Tribe needs to sue the parent company.

It's just like, okay if Houston legitimately had the money and Fertitta came over the top with an insane offer, I would get it

I would be pissed, but I would get it

He couldn't even afford the $250 million expansion fee, yet I'm to believe he has the $325 million to match the offer plus whatever the WNBA wants for a relocation fee?

Bullsh*t

And you know they don't have it cause there's no rumors of other legit offers, just the two we know about, and it's been weeks at this point. I'm not mad it isn't official yet, the tribe can work on their own time, apparently they haven't even met to properly discuss things, but the longer this goes on without any numbers coming from the Houston side, the more convinced I am they don't have the money.


The Rockets owner was having liquidity problems going back to before the pandemic if I recall. It's a big reason as to why Harden got traded.

The league looks crazy trying to force the Sun into a situation where the owner is broke. If you can't afford a $250m price tag you have no business being anywhere near a WNBA team.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,985
And1: 59,762
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#74 » by DOT » Wed Aug 13, 2025 9:36 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:The Rockets owner was having liquidity problems going back to before the pandemic if I recall. It's a big reason as to why Harden got traded.

The league looks crazy trying to force the Sun into a situation where the owner is broke. If you can't afford a $250m price tag you have no business being anywhere near a WNBA team.

Not only that, but in a city where they already failed in part due to lack of support like 15 years ago (I know times change, but still)

I was talking to my mom about this, it would be unprecedented to deny both Hartford and Boston in order to force a Houston move, cause again, Houston cannot offer as much as Hartford or Boston, who are both offering $325 million

If it were the other way around, if Houston were offering $325 million and Hartford $200 million, then I would get it, that's how this usually goes, the local city can't afford the price that the city halfway across the country can

But in this case, they have 2 equal, higher offers, one in state one the next state over, and they're still trying to force a move across the country. I don't know if there's any other instance of that, of a team being told they can't stay in their state and have to sell for less and move thousands of miles away

F*ckin' ridiculous. If they go to Houston, I'd be done with the WNBA. I'd still follow my UConn women, but I wouldn't pay one cent to the league after that malarky.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,450
And1: 25,494
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#75 » by hermes » Fri Aug 15, 2025 9:37 pm

seems an especially bad look for the leagues/owners as they are in the midst of negotiating the new cba deal
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,985
And1: 59,762
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#76 » by DOT » Tue Aug 19, 2025 4:05 pm

https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/46015969/sources-connecticut-sun-eye-options-wnba-salvage-sale

The league, in recent weeks, offered to purchase the Sun for $250 million and not charge the buyer an additional relocation fee -- which would allow the league to facilitate a sale to one of its preferred expansion cities, according to sources.


Oh **** all the way off

The biggest issue the league has raised with the tribe regarding a relocation of the Sun to Boston, sources said, was Boston's failure to submit an expansion proposal. But after operating the franchise at a loss over the past two decades, the tribe believes it should be able to sell the franchise for the highest possible price. It also sees the value of keeping the team in New England and in the hands of an experienced former NBA minority partner.


Hey, look at this:

In April, sources said the league sent a letter to the Sun stating that any sale would be subject to approval by the WNBA's Board of Governors and that the tribe "does not have the right ... to change the playing site of the Team's home games from Mohegan Sun Arena or to conduct any Team operations outside of the Team Member's Territory (which is defined as the 75-mile area surrounding Montville, Connecticut and does not include Boston)."


You know what city is within 75 miles of Montville? **** Hartford

Absolutely absurd

After informing the WNBA of its plans, the league requested the tribe allow the Cleveland Cavaliers ownership to submit a bid before launching its sale exploration process, sources said, because Cleveland was considered one of the strongest expansion candidates and could facilitate a relocation on a short timetable.

Selling the Sun to Cleveland would also have presumably opened up another expansion slot to a city such as Houston, which Engelbert highlighted as "the one we have our eye on" at the league's expansion announcement in June.

However, Sun ownership declined Cleveland's bid, which sources said came in slightly lower than the subsequent expansion fee, after it was advised it could get more money from other offers.

A source close to the ownership group says the tribe feels the league became antagonistic toward the sale after they declined Cleveland's bid and chose to explore other interested parties.


What a **** joke.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
ellobo
Veteran
Posts: 2,923
And1: 4,815
Joined: Aug 06, 2017

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#77 » by ellobo » Tue Aug 19, 2025 5:27 pm

DOT wrote:https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/46015969/sources-connecticut-sun-eye-options-wnba-salvage-sale

The league, in recent weeks, offered to purchase the Sun for $250 million and not charge the buyer an additional relocation fee -- which would allow the league to facilitate a sale to one of its preferred expansion cities, according to sources.


Oh **** all the way off

The biggest issue the league has raised with the tribe regarding a relocation of the Sun to Boston, sources said, was Boston's failure to submit an expansion proposal. But after operating the franchise at a loss over the past two decades, the tribe believes it should be able to sell the franchise for the highest possible price. It also sees the value of keeping the team in New England and in the hands of an experienced former NBA minority partner.


Hey, look at this:

In April, sources said the league sent a letter to the Sun stating that any sale would be subject to approval by the WNBA's Board of Governors and that the tribe "does not have the right ... to change the playing site of the Team's home games from Mohegan Sun Arena or to conduct any Team operations outside of the Team Member's Territory (which is defined as the 75-mile area surrounding Montville, Connecticut and does not include Boston)."


You know what city is within 75 miles of Montville? **** Hartford

Absolutely absurd

After informing the WNBA of its plans, the league requested the tribe allow the Cleveland Cavaliers ownership to submit a bid before launching its sale exploration process, sources said, because Cleveland was considered one of the strongest expansion candidates and could facilitate a relocation on a short timetable.

Selling the Sun to Cleveland would also have presumably opened up another expansion slot to a city such as Houston, which Engelbert highlighted as "the one we have our eye on" at the league's expansion announcement in June.

However, Sun ownership declined Cleveland's bid, which sources said came in slightly lower than the subsequent expansion fee, after it was advised it could get more money from other offers.

A source close to the ownership group says the tribe feels the league became antagonistic toward the sale after they declined Cleveland's bid and chose to explore other interested parties.


What a **** joke.


The league's treatment of the tribe is ridiculous. If the money was equivalent that's one thing, but to make the ownership team take a lower bid is outrageous.

It also seems like it sets a precedent that would reduce franchise values. If you know that down the road you can't sell your team to the highest bidder, that's going to affect the value of the team. Or maybe they figure they have enough prospective buyers from within NBA ownership and would actually prefer to discourage independent ownership in the future.

By the way, to me there's nothing cooler than the Sun wearing jerseys that say "Keesusk." If the team stays in New England, I can imagine that staying as an occasional throwback nod to team history, depending on tribe approval, although I'm not sure it wouldn't cross over from cool to cringe under those circumstances. But if the tribe is forced to sell to an approved expansion city, forget about it.
Just because it happened to you, doesn't make it interesting.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.

Yesterday I was lying; today I'm telling the truth.
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,985
And1: 59,762
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#78 » by DOT » Tue Aug 19, 2025 5:33 pm

ellobo wrote:
DOT wrote:https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/46015969/sources-connecticut-sun-eye-options-wnba-salvage-sale

The league, in recent weeks, offered to purchase the Sun for $250 million and not charge the buyer an additional relocation fee -- which would allow the league to facilitate a sale to one of its preferred expansion cities, according to sources.


Oh **** all the way off

The biggest issue the league has raised with the tribe regarding a relocation of the Sun to Boston, sources said, was Boston's failure to submit an expansion proposal. But after operating the franchise at a loss over the past two decades, the tribe believes it should be able to sell the franchise for the highest possible price. It also sees the value of keeping the team in New England and in the hands of an experienced former NBA minority partner.


Hey, look at this:

In April, sources said the league sent a letter to the Sun stating that any sale would be subject to approval by the WNBA's Board of Governors and that the tribe "does not have the right ... to change the playing site of the Team's home games from Mohegan Sun Arena or to conduct any Team operations outside of the Team Member's Territory (which is defined as the 75-mile area surrounding Montville, Connecticut and does not include Boston)."


You know what city is within 75 miles of Montville? **** Hartford

Absolutely absurd

After informing the WNBA of its plans, the league requested the tribe allow the Cleveland Cavaliers ownership to submit a bid before launching its sale exploration process, sources said, because Cleveland was considered one of the strongest expansion candidates and could facilitate a relocation on a short timetable.

Selling the Sun to Cleveland would also have presumably opened up another expansion slot to a city such as Houston, which Engelbert highlighted as "the one we have our eye on" at the league's expansion announcement in June.

However, Sun ownership declined Cleveland's bid, which sources said came in slightly lower than the subsequent expansion fee, after it was advised it could get more money from other offers.

A source close to the ownership group says the tribe feels the league became antagonistic toward the sale after they declined Cleveland's bid and chose to explore other interested parties.


What a **** joke.


The league's treatment of the tribe is ridiculous. If the money was equivalent that's one thing, but to make the ownership team take a lower bid is outrageous.

It also seems like it sets a precedent that would reduce franchise values. If you know that down the road you can't sell your team to the highest bidder, that's going to affect the value of the team. Or maybe they figure they have enough prospective buyers from within NBA ownership and would actually prefer to discourage independent ownership in the future.

By the way, to me there's nothing cooler than the Sun wearing jerseys that say "Keesusk." If the team stays in New England, I can imagine that staying as an occasional throwback nod to team history, depending on tribe approval, although I'm not sure it wouldn't cross over from cool to cringe under those circumstances. But if the tribe is forced to sell to an approved expansion city, forget about it.

There is no way this happens to a team owned by a billionaire NBA owner

That's what this is all about, they want to make the WNBA a subsidiary of the MNBA, which is also why they don't want to sell to Boston, cause Pagulica isn't gonna be part of Celtics ownership after the sale

It's just such a slimeball move by the league, if the Sun leave CT I might not be a WNBA fan anymore, it's just ridiculous.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
ellobo
Veteran
Posts: 2,923
And1: 4,815
Joined: Aug 06, 2017

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#79 » by ellobo » Tue Aug 19, 2025 5:41 pm

DOT wrote:
ellobo wrote:
DOT wrote:https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/46015969/sources-connecticut-sun-eye-options-wnba-salvage-sale



Oh **** all the way off



Hey, look at this:



You know what city is within 75 miles of Montville? **** Hartford

Absolutely absurd



What a **** joke.


The league's treatment of the tribe is ridiculous. If the money was equivalent that's one thing, but to make the ownership team take a lower bid is outrageous.

It also seems like it sets a precedent that would reduce franchise values. If you know that down the road you can't sell your team to the highest bidder, that's going to affect the value of the team. Or maybe they figure they have enough prospective buyers from within NBA ownership and would actually prefer to discourage independent ownership in the future.

By the way, to me there's nothing cooler than the Sun wearing jerseys that say "Keesusk." If the team stays in New England, I can imagine that staying as an occasional throwback nod to team history, depending on tribe approval, although I'm not sure it wouldn't cross over from cool to cringe under those circumstances. But if the tribe is forced to sell to an approved expansion city, forget about it.

There is no way this happens to a team owned by a billionaire NBA owner

That's what this is all about, they want to make the WNBA a subsidiary of the MNBA, which is also why they don't want to sell to Boston, cause Pagulica isn't gonna be part of Celtics ownership after the sale

It's just such a slimeball move by the league, if the Sun leave CT I might not be a WNBA fan anymore, it's just ridiculous.


Just saw a comment on Reddit: "Next thing that the commish is going to do is say that the league would buy the Sun for $24 in beads."
Just because it happened to you, doesn't make it interesting.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.

Yesterday I was lying; today I'm telling the truth.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,450
And1: 25,494
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: WNBA expansion 

Post#80 » by hermes » Tue Aug 19, 2025 5:56 pm

a league statement emphasized that "relocation decisions are made by the WNBA Board of Governors and not by individual teams

is this true in other leagues?
when the rams and raiders moved to los angeles and las vegas, the league made the final choice not the owners of the teams?

Return to WNBA