giberish wrote:oldncreaky wrote:wegotthabeet wrote:
He would literally start on every NBA team. No team has two better forwards and if so name them.
That poster just hates on Scottie to an irrational extent for whatever reason. It’s not a good take and hard to take them seriously.
This
Barnes is not a #1 offensive option IMO, but guys as talented as him just don't come off the bench in the playoffs, they play 40 minutes a game.
Barnes would start and play max minutes for any playoff team -- except possibly Orlando, which would have the problem of 3 similar-size guys with questionable shooting -- but even then, I'd expect a coach to try really, really hard to find a substitution pattern first that allowed all 3 to start. So too would Aaron Gordon start for any playoff team I can recall, champion, contender or otherwise. So too would Siakam, a player of similar level but significantly different strengths/weaknesses.
(Aside: yeah, I dropped the dude who always trolls by ragging on Raptors -- not worth the energy)
Barnes is very awkward at SF and a bunch of teams have better PF's. I would say that he's very unlikely to come off the bench at this point because if he's on a team where it doesn't make sense to start him for fit reasons then a trade is going to be made. Either Barnes himself will be traded or else the PF in his way will be traded if Barnes is a better timeline fit (such as the Siakam deal).
To the bolded: what? I think SF is his most natural position.
Scottie has played literally every position in his 4 years in Toronto. He can fill in a bit at PG, but the lack of shooting means it is not sustainable and makes the team too easy to scheme against, as the Raptors found out in 2023-24. Scottie is a surprisingly good fit at C, but the downside of losing his perimeter and help-side D is too high when you keep Scottie anchored in the paint. But any other position, SF/SG/PF, anytime Scottie is on the wing -- he's just fine.