leswizards wrote:I don’t think anyone hates or has been hating on Bilal.
Agree 100% -- just looking at his play on the court & assessing the numbers he's put up. They have not been good
leswizards wrote:...my guess is almost all wizards fans desperately want him to succeed....
For sure! & I don't even see why the "almost" is needed. Why would anyone NOT want him to succeed.
leswizards wrote:...If you are bothered by people offering honest assessments of how bad Bilal and all the wizards have been the past 2 seasons, that says more about you and your ability to read conflicting opinions than it says about the person who “hates” Bilal.
For sure, at least in some cases. OTOH, no one has expected the Wizards to be any better than they've been! New mgt took a dead-end low-mediocre team & tore it apart right down to the studs with the goal of rebuilding from zero one player at a time (the only way possible given how little we had at the end of the '22-23 season).
Certainly, you don't question that decision? I hope not!

Of course, every choice we made in pursuit of that goal can be questioned. That's obvious.
E.g. it's fair to question the choice of Bilal in the '23 draft -- as you have, right?
After all, we could have had any one of the next 10 guys: Jarace Walker, Taylor Hendricks, Cason Wallace, Jett Howard, Dereck Lively, Gradey Dick, Jordan Hawkins, Kobe Bufkin, Keyonte George, or Jalen Hood-Schifino.
As it turned out, Lively has been good, & so has Wallace. Then again, looking at the first 17 picks, only 5 of them -- Wembenyana, Amen & Ausar Thompson, Wallace & Liveley can be said to have been better so far than Bilal taken at 7.
I guess if 2 of the next 10 guys taken after Bilal have been better so far (& at least one of the two is a couple of years older), I guess it's kind of hard to criticize the choice of Bilal.
Or do you disagree?
Especially since those same 2 guys have also been better than the #2 pick, the #3 pick, & the #6 pick -- as has Bilal btw.
Of course, I may have you wrong. You may actually think, correctly, that we handled the '23 draft pretty well.
Then there was Jaquez of course. I know you like him -- now, that is. You didn't say anything about him in '23. Any more than you did about Liveley.
Or do I have that wrong?
Jaquez was a graduating senior &, no surprise, has come along faster than most of the younger guys taken before him.
We didn't take him at #7 -- as (now not then) you wish we had. Of course the guy picking at 8 didn't take him either. Nor did the guy picking at 9. Nor did the guy picking at 10. Nor did the guy picking at 11. Nor did the guy picking at 12. Nor did the guy picking at 13. Nor did the guy picking at 14. Nor did the guy picking at 15. Nor did the guy picking at 16. Nor did the guy picking at 17.
What a bunch of dummies, huh? You sure are way ahead of all of them, huh?

Unlike them, you know for sure that we should have picked... ummm... the guy that turned out best. So far.
Do I have that right? Have I misrepresented your desire to have picked Lively or Jaquez because, you know, ummm they're better? Right?