Knicksfan1992 wrote:Wildcat wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:
Beasley is a much more catch and shoot oriented guy than Clarkson. I actually think he's a much cleaner fit than Simmons.
Fun stat, per NBA.com, Beasley took, by far, the most catch and shoot threes in the league last year and shot a ridiculous 43.1% on them. He took over 100 more than the next closest guy (Derrick White). You could make the argument he was the best pure shooter in the league last season.
Another fun fact, the Knicks generated the 4th least catch and shoot 3's per game in the league last season. Having Beasley come in for 15-25 minutes a night with a green light can really jump start an offense that had a tendency to get stuck in mud at times.
Where are those 15-25 minutes coming from? Not from Hart, not from Clarkson, not from Deuce, not from Yabusele. And this team's 10th man (Ariel) is probably only seeing about 5-10 minutes per and some nights he may not even play. The Knicks would need to move someone to free up that time.
I don't think worrying about minutes is a reason not to sign a useful player who addresses a clear need. It may be a reason why Beasley doesn't end up choosing to come here but, the Knicks could use all the depth they can get.
Hart has had knee problems for years.
KAT's Injury history is well documented. Same with OG.
Brunson misses his token 5-10 games a year usually because of ankle sprains.
I think people forget the Knicks were outlier level healthy last season. We're due for some regression in that area. Beasley was legit rotation player for a playoff team last year.
We can use him.
If the Knicks use last years starting lineup we quite literally still don't have a backup wing unless they trust Dadiet to make a leap...If one of OG, Mikal or Hart gets hurt we are pretty thin at the wing fairly quickly.
This is the stuff that frustrates about fans.
There are 2 entities in this conversation: Knicks and Beasley. We can make infinite reasons why the Knicks can use Beasley, and I'd agree with most of them (BUT you still need to a trade because he's not coming in to be 10th or 9th man or some insurance for injury). No one is reading the room properly. There's literally no reason for Beasley to come to NY (other than LOL, WE NY). There are 5 or 6 teams that can offer him at least 10 million or even double what the Knicks can offer. He's not coming here for 3.whatever million the Knicks can offer.