Kings/Lakers

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,143
And1: 8,496
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Kings/Lakers 

Post#1 » by SNPA » Mon Aug 25, 2025 11:29 pm

Ugh. Hate the idea of this because the Lakers get a lot better talent but…

Rui/Gabe/Kleber/JV
For
DDR/Monk/Carter/Davis

It comes to within 1.3 off which I believe Sac has before tax issues arise.

LA does it for talent.

Sac does it for two reasons, one is balance and the other is to free up space next year so they can give Keegan and Ellis extensions.

Sabonis/Raynaud/Eubanks
Rui/Kleber/JV
Keegan/Clifford
LaVine/Ellis
Dennis/Westbrook/Gabe

That’s just a far more balanced team.
Apz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,763
And1: 2,501
Joined: Jan 18, 2019
 

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#2 » by Apz » Tue Aug 26, 2025 12:04 am

I think it makes lakers too small and defensively worse
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,471
And1: 14,206
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#3 » by HornetJail » Tue Aug 26, 2025 1:38 am

any teams out there that would give LAL a big man for DeRozan?

Huge talent upgrade for the Lakers, and I think they kinda have to do this if offered, but it requires roster balancing, and DeRozan isn't a fit with the Lakers imo
investigate Adam Silver
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,056
And1: 13,981
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#4 » by Godaddycurse » Tue Aug 26, 2025 2:37 am

Luka/Smart
Reaves/Monk
Derozan/Knecht
Lebron/Laravia
Ayton/Hayes

Dont like it for LAL. I think adding one of Derozan/Monk is okay, but not both
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,143
And1: 8,496
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#5 » by SNPA » Tue Aug 26, 2025 2:57 am

Godaddycurse wrote:Luka/Smart
Reaves/Monk
Derozan/Knecht
Lebron/Laravia
Ayton/Hayes

Dont like it for LAL. I think adding one of Derozan/Monk is okay, but not both

What about scaled back…

DDR/Davis/Jones
For
Rui/Kleber
SlimShady83
RealGM
Posts: 14,679
And1: 4,485
Joined: Jun 19, 2012

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#6 » by SlimShady83 » Tue Aug 26, 2025 3:14 am

Sorry op Lakers not giving up Rui or Vando for that matter
My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Bird, Duncan, Shaq

My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Pippen, Rodman, Dirk

Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
SlimShady83
RealGM
Posts: 14,679
And1: 4,485
Joined: Jun 19, 2012

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#7 » by SlimShady83 » Tue Aug 26, 2025 5:11 am

Godaddycurse wrote:Luka/Smart
Reaves/Monk
Derozan/Knecht
Lebron/Laravia
Ayton/Hayes

Dont like it for LAL. I think adding one of Derozan/Monk is okay, but not both


If I'm choosing between the two, it's Monk, I like Demar but his time is up and not a real good fit for what Lakers need. We could use Monk off the bench for some scoring though.

That is also such a small line up and being in the West Lakers need as much a size as possible. Not willing to trade Vando/Rui for what Kings/Op are offering
My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Bird, Duncan, Shaq

My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Pippen, Rodman, Dirk

Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,719
And1: 32,003
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#8 » by Dr Aki » Tue Aug 26, 2025 9:16 am

Gross, no way the Lakers are taking on that much 2026-27 money
Image
nolian
Freshman
Posts: 69
And1: 13
Joined: Dec 27, 2017
 

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#9 » by nolian » Tue Aug 26, 2025 12:20 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:Luka/Smart
Reaves/Monk
Derozan/Knecht
Lebron/Laravia
Ayton/Hayes

Dont like it for LAL. I think adding one of Derozan/Monk is okay, but not both


i desagree

i think M.Monk is perfect to receive Luka's pass from arc. I think DDR wuold be a fake starter, with more minutes when Luka is on the bench

so, i think the trade works good for Lakers
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 13,036
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#10 » by brackdan70 » Tue Aug 26, 2025 12:34 pm

It’s good value for the lakers but seems a bit of an odd trade for both teams. There is a lot of future money going to the Lakers. I assume they want to keep a max slot in salary available for 26/27, but IDK.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,057
And1: 262
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#11 » by longfellow44 » Tue Aug 26, 2025 1:33 pm

I really hope the kings never do something like this. That is far too much value to give up for what we get back. Derozan for Rui plus filler is fine adding Monk and Carter for the rest of that deal is crazy.
Jody Smokz
Starter
Posts: 2,409
And1: 1,442
Joined: May 20, 2015
 

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#12 » by Jody Smokz » Tue Aug 26, 2025 2:20 pm

Rui > Derozan for the Lakers. With Luka and Lebron there is absolutely 0 reasons to add a player like Derozan when Rui is hitting 40% of open 3s.
JB2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,810
And1: 7,629
Joined: Mar 10, 2009

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#13 » by JB2 » Tue Aug 26, 2025 3:38 pm

Pivoting here but what about a straight swap of Knecht for Ellis?
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,057
And1: 262
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#14 » by longfellow44 » Tue Aug 26, 2025 4:12 pm

JB2 wrote:Pivoting here but what about a straight swap of Knecht for Ellis?

not even close Ellis is worth way more. Defensive stopper 3pt shooter better than bench scorer.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,908
And1: 35,992
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#15 » by jbk1234 » Wed Aug 27, 2025 3:44 pm

JB2 wrote:Pivoting here but what about a straight swap of Knecht for Ellis?


Knecht has no trade value as has been pretty widely reported.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
kobe_vs_jordan
RealGM
Posts: 10,662
And1: 5,065
Joined: Jan 07, 2012
Location: Atl
   

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#16 » by kobe_vs_jordan » Wed Aug 27, 2025 4:36 pm

Lakers become worse spacing and defensively. Easy no imo for Lakers. I counter with Expiring, JV, Dalton for Monk or DD.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,647
And1: 6,310
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#17 » by gswhoops » Wed Aug 27, 2025 5:30 pm

Huge talent win for LAL but DeRozan and Monk are really bad fits for a team that already has too many mouths to feed on offense and desperately needs size/defense. Monk for Gafford has been beaten to death on this board but that would make this much more palatable for the Lakers.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,947
And1: 12,076
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#18 » by LightTheBeam » Wed Aug 27, 2025 6:11 pm

kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Lakers become worse spacing and defensively. Easy no imo for Lakers. I counter with Expiring, JV, Dalton for Monk or DD.


Something like this would be agreeable to me. I think a perfect scenario for both teams would be something like

LAL out: Kleber, Vincent, Knecht, 2nd
LAL in: Demar

Luka - Reaves - Lebron - Rui - Ayton
Smart - Demar - LaRavia - Vando - Hayes

SAC out: Demar, Saric
SAC in: Vincent, Kleber

3rd team (Jazz or Brookyln) Out: Nothing
3rd Team in: Knecht, Saric, LAL 2nd
JB2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,810
And1: 7,629
Joined: Mar 10, 2009

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#19 » by JB2 » Wed Aug 27, 2025 9:53 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
JB2 wrote:Pivoting here but what about a straight swap of Knecht for Ellis?


Knecht has no trade value as has been pretty widely reported.



Where has it and what has been widely reported?

If you focus on the best parts of DK, you can maybe convince yourself of a 6th man type of potential - as he's flashed. If you focus on the low points, he's a 'take a flyer' on a really good shooter but will likely live at the end of rotation.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder type of situation but feels like he's got somewhere between 1 - 2 2nd round (s) type of value. Perhaps closer to 1 given this past SL but I'd assume most teams would give somewhat of the benefit of doubt after the failed trade and never getting back on track. New environment could yield better results.

Either way, 'no value' seems a bit drastic.
Vae Victus
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,127
And1: 1,930
Joined: Jun 09, 2013

Re: Kings/Lakers 

Post#20 » by Vae Victus » Wed Aug 27, 2025 10:39 pm

Hell to the no. These are all TERRIBLE offers to the Lakers. The Kleber/Vincent expirings alone dwarf whatever value one thinks Monk might be to offset DDR significant negative value, especially in today’s CBA environment.

Lakers better off just seeing what shakes out at the trade deadline instead of spending their expiring salary trade ballast on players who won’t move the needle enough to justify their salaries. Hell taking on Monk basically means Reaves should be pushed out next season as Monk is now eating up Reaves salary slot. So unless Reaves is outgoing for an equal level big on a comparable salary the lakers downgrade significantly due to the redundant all offense/No defense in having both Monk/Reaves on the roster. DDR is just a plain non winning impact basketball player these days. If he was on the min, sure he can score some buckets and be a mid range weapon off the bench. But he doesn’t provide enough of what winning teams need, spacing and defense all while being paid handsomely for his obsolete skill set.

Return to Trades and Transactions