Jammer wrote:Fierce1 wrote:jmr07019 wrote:Was it the offense or defense that failed the Celtics last year in the playoffs? I would say it was the offense that failed.
Team PPG - Playoffs

Opponent PPG Allowed - Playoffs

Game 1 against the Knicks - the Celtics scored 16 points in Q4 on 4/21 shooting. 5 points in OT on 2/8 shooting.
Game 2 against the Knicks - the Celtics scored 17 points in Q4 on 5/24 shooting.
True.
Cs can't get easy buckets because they're not good in fast breaks.
And the Cs are missing a guy like Simons, a dynamic scoring guard.
So yeah, offense became a problem against NY.
It was just shooting 3s and the Jays going 1 on 1.
They became very predictable.
NOT TRUE. The Celtics were VERY PREDICTABLE FROM JANUARY FORWARD. Stand around 3's. Lacked a bruising pick setter (only Horford and Holiday could read the floor well enough to be able to time a well placed screen (location, body angle), and neither one is a bruiser).
I don't know if the Celtics simply lack a great cutter or if they had a great pick setter (Dave Cowens was their Best EVER), maybe they'd have more guys cutting to the hoop.
Queta can set a good pick, it just seems he only knows how to do the basics. It’s nothing like he instinctively knows when he could set a brush screen or something. If it’s not an obvious action, he’s not going to get it. I mean, none of the other guys either, but I feel Queta could be a real impediment if he knew when/what to do.
I likely can’t word it the way I’m thinking it, but I’m just saying screening doesn’t seem to be instinctual for him, he has the ability to separate the defense with his body, but the screens are just like pnr, what he’s “supposed to do.” If he had the knowledge of angles and when you need one, on top of how he sets with that wide immovable base, he’d be golden.
One thing you can count on, I talk about basketball but I can’t talk basketball.
