lambchop wrote:UcanUwill wrote:Bob8 wrote:
Yes, people doesn't understand that just shooting is nowdays not enough.
I understand that, but we aren't arguing guys would be huge minute getters, definitely not everyone in the NBA plays good defenders, even the role players can be very bad defenders, especially the shooters. If you shoot 3s and play D, you will get at least 20 mil now.
The issue with guys his age is that he's the kind of guy that would only be useful on a playoff, however, he lacks the NBA experience to actually be impactful. Pablo Prigioni was even older as a rookie, but he earned his minutes with that tenacious full court defense that he actually never showed when he had huge offensive roles in Europe and with Argentina.
Regarding Obst's defense, NBA playoff teams put a premium on switching on defense. I just don't see how Obst would keep up, unless he's shooting close to 50% from deep. In the last 3 seasons in the German playoffs his shooting has been in the mid to high 30s.
Yeah I get, I disagree that he would need to shoot 50% from deep to justify minutes, he is really not that much of a liability. We brought Seth Curry, I think Seth Curry is definitely more of the liability, he is shorter and slower for sure if you ask me, and I mean he played in the NBA for years. Of course I am not denying that Seth is one of the best shooters in NBA history, so there is that, but what I am saying, guy like Obst or Carroll playing in the NBA really isn't some kind of crazy idea at all. I think guys like Micic, Jasikevicius are definitely worse NBA fits, because they need ball in their hands to be effective, but frankly their offense didn't translate well to begin with, and not like they played defense, so these guys were just waste of everyones time in the NBA. These super shooters, and not Jimmer Freddette super shootes who needed entire team built around them, but I mean the guys who know how to move off ball and be 4th. option, these guys could contribute on almost any level of team.