SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,216
- And1: 13,036
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
Bucks need to attach a protected first or two good seconds here. The value is not close.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,610
- And1: 13,970
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?
Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green
Monk can at least shoot.
Kuzma isn’t good at anything.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,061
- And1: 952
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
sackings916 wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?
Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green
Are you familiar with Monk? He was 2nd last season in pick and roll Ppp. Giannis would feast with Monk in the pick and roll. Playing those other guys are fine for a rebuilding team, but a team trying to compete would be superior with Monk instead of Rollins or Green.
I would take AJ Green 10/10 over monk - Better shooter, better defender
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,061
- And1: 952
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
JRoy wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?
Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green
Monk can at least shoot.
Kuzma isn’t good at anything.
Rather just give those minutes to Rollins - Small sample size, but Rollins was better in 2p%, 3p%, TS% Off Rating and DEF Rating
https://stathead.com/basketball/versus-finder.cgi?request=1&seasons_type=forall&year_min=2025&player_id1=rolliry01&player_id2=monkma01
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,061
- And1: 952
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
If the Bucks didnt have Trent Jr and KPJ - I would look at this trade, but there in no reason for the Bucks to do this.
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,697
- And1: 1,366
- Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
Better idea.
DDR for Kuzma and Unprotected Bucks ‘31 pick.
DDR for Kuzma and Unprotected Bucks ‘31 pick.
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,193
- And1: 836
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
mlloyd10 wrote:sackings916 wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?
Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green
Are you familiar with Monk? He was 2nd last season in pick and roll Ppp. Giannis would feast with Monk in the pick and roll. Playing those other guys are fine for a rebuilding team, but a team trying to compete would be superior with Monk instead of Rollins or Green.
I would take AJ Green 10/10 over monk - Better shooter, better defender
It’s not close. Maybe Green takes a step this year though.
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
- JayMKE
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,314
- And1: 17,173
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
- Location: LA
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
OGSactownballer wrote:Better idea.
DDR for Kuzma and Unprotected Bucks ‘31 pick.
lmao hell naw
Bucks don't want Derozan for free even, he's a terrible fit with Giannis. Zero value is conveyed. Find another team to send him too.
FREE GIANNIS
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,061
- And1: 952
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
sackings916 wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:sackings916 wrote:
Are you familiar with Monk? He was 2nd last season in pick and roll Ppp. Giannis would feast with Monk in the pick and roll. Playing those other guys are fine for a rebuilding team, but a team trying to compete would be superior with Monk instead of Rollins or Green.
I would take AJ Green 10/10 over monk - Better shooter, better defender
It’s not close. Maybe Green takes a step this year though.
Green - Better 3pt %, TS%, eFG%, ORtg / Defense is about the same i guess
Green floor is Luke Kennard and ceiling is Klay
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,193
- And1: 836
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
mlloyd10 wrote:sackings916 wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:
I would take AJ Green 10/10 over monk - Better shooter, better defender
It’s not close. Maybe Green takes a step this year though.
Green - Better 3pt %, TS%, eFG%, ORtg / Defense is about the same i guess
Green floor is Luke Kennard and ceiling is Klay
Those numbers only mean so much. Green is a low usage role player, and needs others to create for him. Monk is a playmaker and shot creator for himself and others. Green is mostly taking wide open spot up shots, so yeah his efficiency may look better on the surface but it’s not the same impact as Monk. Defenses have to key in on Monk or he could go off for 30+ pts or 10+ assists, which would take some of the pressure off Giannis.
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
- mlloyd10
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,061
- And1: 952
- Joined: Jan 18, 2012
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
sackings916 wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:sackings916 wrote:
It’s not close. Maybe Green takes a step this year though.
Green - Better 3pt %, TS%, eFG%, ORtg / Defense is about the same i guess
Green floor is Luke Kennard and ceiling is Klay
Those numbers only mean so much. Green is a low usage role player, and needs others to create for him. Monk is a playmaker and shot creator for himself and others. Green is mostly taking wide open spot up shots, so yeah his efficiency may look better on the surface but it’s not the same impact as Monk. Defenses have to key in on Monk or he could go off for 30+ pts or 10+ assists, which would take some of the pressure off Giannis.
Nah - We good without him
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,193
- And1: 836
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
mlloyd10 wrote:sackings916 wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:
Green - Better 3pt %, TS%, eFG%, ORtg / Defense is about the same i guess
Green floor is Luke Kennard and ceiling is Klay
Those numbers only mean so much. Green is a low usage role player, and needs others to create for him. Monk is a playmaker and shot creator for himself and others. Green is mostly taking wide open spot up shots, so yeah his efficiency may look better on the surface but it’s not the same impact as Monk. Defenses have to key in on Monk or he could go off for 30+ pts or 10+ assists, which would take some of the pressure off Giannis.
Nah - We good without him
I wasn’t pushing for this trade at all
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,035
- And1: 4,161
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: SAC-MIL (Monk for Kuzma)
mlloyd10 wrote:sackings916 wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:What's the motivation for either team?
Monk is a chucker who isn't really good - Rather the Bucks just give those mins to Ryan Rollins/AJ Green
Are you familiar with Monk? He was 2nd last season in pick and roll Ppp. Giannis would feast with Monk in the pick and roll. Playing those other guys are fine for a rebuilding team, but a team trying to compete would be superior with Monk instead of Rollins or Green.
I would take AJ Green 10/10 over monk - Better shooter, better defender
What if it were Klay and Hardy from Dallas to Mil? Where Kuz still goes to Sac, but Monk goes to Dallas instead.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Return to Trades and Transactions