rosenthall wrote:DuckIII wrote:sco wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/nba-9-best-shooters-long-120000298.html
3. Zach LaVine, G, Sacramento Kings
Zach LaVine just had one of the best non-Splash Brothers shooting seasons in NBA history, and it flew entirely under the radar. LaVine drained 44.6 percent of his threes last year between stops in Chicago and Sacramento, roaring back to form after injuries limited to only 25 games the previous year. LaVine is equally deadly on pull-ups and typically more efficient catch-and-shoot attempts: he made 43.8 percent of his off-the-dribble threes last season on 320 attempts, and hit 44.7 percent of his spot-ups on 206 attempts. His quick trigger allowed him to make 43 percent of his tightly guarded threes with defenders within four feet of him. LaVine’s contract is so big that the Bulls couldn’t give him away before the Kings finally took the bait, but the 30-year-old could be an unrestricted free agent after this season if he opts out of the last year of his deal. It’s a shame LaVine has spent his entire NBA career in terrible situations between Minnesota, Chicago, and now Sacramento. Here’s hoping he finds a good organization where he can play off a true superstar before his prime is over.
Could not agree more. Every word.
Lavine has quietly become an underrated player. Sort of like what happened to Drummond by the time we signed him. He's empty calories as a lead guy, but he does things with the ball that only a few players in the league can do. And last year he played at a decent usage. A savvy GM could make a great move by acquiring him for probably cap filler and a little bit of draft capital, for a guy who's frankly probably as effective as someone like Mikal Bridges right now.
I dunno. I think he's fairly rated. If he was on a $25M salary, that trade return could've been better. Even then, 3 solid bench players (and near/expiring salaries) and the lotto pick seems like a great return (even though the hypothetical 2021-2023 return could've been better, and disregarding that it was our own pick). I'd make that trade 7x a week. Lavine is a great scorer, but he's a big problem at $47M (esp. on a team with shaky defense, leadership and playmaking). His defense and intangibles aren't adequate enough (and his offensive IQ/playmaking isn't good enough to compensate, be a #1 option). His BPM with the Kings was negative! His on/off was also negative.
He's definitely a top-10 SG though (Reaves, Powell, Herro, Bane), and if you were a contender willing to pay 2nd apron, I'd gladly add him to the mix.
How traditional bigs and PGs died though... it's been overlooked how the traditional SGs have also died. There's still a job for a prime Ray Allen or Klay Thompson, but their value would be in how low their usage is (with high efficiency). If you're not a successful NBA triple-threat/creator, you're just better off shooting open 3Ps at a 35% clip than being a sieve and shooting 39% on more defended shots. "Role-player diversity" has died. Height/physique/position don't matter; are you able to defend 2+ spots and shoot 3Ps? Even the elite specialists like Gobert and Duncan Robinson can't hang in post-season anymore; quite radically compared to just 4Y ago. Herro made a jump maybe cause he successfully added PG responsibilities (dunno the ceiling there).