PushDaRock wrote:drekwins wrote:PushDaRock wrote:
I'm not 100% certain but I think there is likely enough cover for him in this situation at least from a federal perspective. It's probably unlikely that it can be proven that Ballmer was intended to or was able to enrich himself by doing what he did. A civil suit is maybe possible but going after Ballmer seems like potentially career suicide as well so I don't it's likely that gets pursued.
But yes, a lot can change as more info comes out.
There are a lot of potential legal issues. They paid Kawhi as a 1099 independent contractor when the true nature of the transaction was extra bonus compensation (since he provided nothing additionally to earn it). Since they paid him as an independent contractor, federal, state and local payroll taxes were not taken. In additon, withholdings were not made towards the NBA pension fund. They also had to falsify business records in order to complete the transaction.
There are additional potential charges related to the formation of the company itself and the conspiracy behind it. Was the company conducting true business activities or was it inherently just used as checkbook/savings account? This would effectively make the entire creation of this company a sham and criminal organization.
I'm not certain on this and definitely could be wrong but those legal issues IMO are probably more directed towards Kawhi and Uncle Dennis who benefitted from this than toward Ballmer himself.
Feels like there has to be a fall guy this time around.