xdrta+ wrote:AirP. wrote:
That's a tweak in the current CBA, that a player has to clear waivers by Aug 31. Before they just had to be waived by Aug 31.
I like OMP. Wonder if he gets more than a 2-way?
Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51
xdrta+ wrote:AirP. wrote:
That's a tweak in the current CBA, that a player has to clear waivers by Aug 31. Before they just had to be waived by Aug 31.
In the latest episode of his "Pablo Torre Finds Out" podcast, Torre cited a trove of internal documents from the tree-planting company Aspiration, which Ballmer partially funded with a $50 million investment through his personal LLC in Sept. 14 2021.
Later that month, on Sept. 27, 2021, the Clippers announced a $300 million partnership with the now-bankrupt Aspiration, including sponsorship in the team's new arena and on the team's jersey patch.
According to Torre, Leonard agreed to a four-year, $28 million endorsement deal in April 2022 through his LLC, KL2 Aspire. The endorsement deal came nine months after Leonard signed a four-year, $176.3 million contract to remain with the Clippers -- the maximum allowed at the time under the NBA's collective bargaining agreement.
A clause in one of the documents purportedly obtained by Torre states that the deal between Aspiration and KL2 Aspire would be voided if Leonard left the Clippers. According to Torre, Leonard also could "decline to proceed with any action desired" by Aspiration and continue to get paid.
The endorsement deal came nine months after Leonard signed a four-year, $176.3 million contract to remain with the Clippers -- the maximum allowed at the time under the NBA's collective bargaining agreement.
statsman wrote:The endorsement deal came nine months after Leonard signed a four-year, $176.3 million contract to remain with the Clippers -- the maximum allowed at the time under the NBA's collective bargaining agreement.
So, he didn't take a pay cut to get this deal? I guess he could have opted out and re-signed for more in subsequent years. Is that what they are hinting at? Seems a stretch.
Chris Porter's Hair wrote:statsman wrote:The endorsement deal came nine months after Leonard signed a four-year, $176.3 million contract to remain with the Clippers -- the maximum allowed at the time under the NBA's collective bargaining agreement.
So, he didn't take a pay cut to get this deal? I guess he could have opted out and re-signed for more in subsequent years. Is that what they are hinting at? Seems a stretch.
I interpreted it more as they paid him more than the maximum allowable by hiding some of it in this hokey endorsement deal.
AirP. wrote:With the amount of money that was being handed out by companies to the NBA, this was expected. I expect more to be shut down in the near future.
BayAreaDub wrote:AirP. wrote:With the amount of money that was being handed out by companies to the NBA, this was expected. I expect more to be shut down in the near future.
It was back up shortly after this report. They have multiple domains. I don't think it'll ever be possible to shut it down.
vvoland wrote:BayAreaDub wrote:AirP. wrote:With the amount of money that was being handed out by companies to the NBA, this was expected. I expect more to be shut down in the near future.
It was back up shortly after this report. They have multiple domains. I don't think it'll ever be possible to shut it down.
This game of whackamole has been going on for 20 years. Best of luck to the nba in doing something the nfl can't.
BayAreaDub wrote:AirP. wrote:With the amount of money that was being handed out by companies to the NBA, this was expected. I expect more to be shut down in the near future.Spoiler:
It was back up shortly after this report. They have multiple domains. I don't think it'll ever be possible to shut it down.
AirP. wrote:vvoland wrote:BayAreaDub wrote:
It was back up shortly after this report. They have multiple domains. I don't think it'll ever be possible to shut it down.
This game of whackamole has been going on for 20 years. Best of luck to the nba in doing something the nfl can't.
There's a much larger amount of money on the line and from multiple companies who have a lot of resources, they'll continue to try to get rid of the sites.
vvoland wrote:AirP. wrote:vvoland wrote:
This game of whackamole has been going on for 20 years. Best of luck to the nba in doing something the nfl can't.
There's a much larger amount of money on the line and from multiple companies who have a lot of resources, they'll continue to try to get rid of the sites.
I don't believe the new CBA has come close to what these same companies pay the NFL and those streams have been going strong for 2 decades. Instead, they should focus on making their product better, most accessible, etc.
Return to Golden State Warriors