MPJ for Monk, DeRozan

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Monky15
Starter
Posts: 2,243
And1: 728
Joined: Mar 13, 2012

MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#1 » by Monky15 » Sat Sep 6, 2025 8:27 am

Kings send Monk and DeRozan to Brooklyn for MPJ.

Kings move on from Kuminga and add shooting at a position of need.
Nets reduce guaranteed salary while splitting 1 larger asset into 2 smaller ones.
It should be easier to get some minor value from Monk or DeRozan for no other reason than having smaller salaries to match.
bpcox05
Analyst
Posts: 3,042
And1: 712
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
       

Re: MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#2 » by bpcox05 » Sat Sep 6, 2025 12:22 pm

I like this for the Kings for many reasons but I feel like Scott Perry wouldn’t end up pulling the trigger on this.

Let’s look at the pros first…

- It saves the Kings some money this year to help them stay below the luxury tax
- Porter’s contract expires in 2 years which aligns with LaVine and Schroder’s deal (setting us up for ample cap space that offseason) and it shaves Monk’s 3rd year off the books helping even more with future cap space
- It rebalances the roster by sending out a guard (helping clear the log jam at guard) and swapping DeRozan for a legitimate PF
- Porter playing PF pushes Murray back to SF (what most Kings fans want to see)
- Porter is a good fit offensively next to Sabonis and can help keep the floor spaced to help Sabonis operate

Again, there is a lot to like from the Kings perspective. However, Scott Perry has talked about the type of players they want here and what he wants our identity to be. He’s repeated it multiple times. These are the attributes he continues to mention…

- Competitive
- Tough
- Team-Oriented
- Disciplined
- Accountable
- Professional

Does that sound like Michael Porter Jr.? I don’t think so but perhaps the trade is less about viewing Porter as a long term, core piece and more about the pros I mentioned above.

Personally, I’d do the trade, but I’m not convinced Scott Perry would.
BK_2020
RealGM
Posts: 16,989
And1: 15,728
Joined: Sep 08, 2020
 

Re: MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#3 » by BK_2020 » Sat Sep 6, 2025 2:04 pm

The Nets don't really have any incentive to reduce guaranteed salary and they would have to cut a guy if they break up MPJ into Monk and DDR for no reason.
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,056
And1: 262
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#4 » by longfellow44 » Sat Sep 6, 2025 3:09 pm

bpcox05 wrote:I like this for the Kings for many reasons but I feel like Scott Perry wouldn’t end up pulling the trigger on this.

Let’s look at the pros first…

- It saves the Kings some money this year to help them stay below the luxury tax
- Porter’s contract expires in 2 years which aligns with LaVine and Schroder’s deal (setting us up for ample cap space that offseason) and it shaves Monk’s 3rd year off the books helping even more with future cap space
- It rebalances the roster by sending out a guard (helping clear the log jam at guard) and swapping DeRozan for a legitimate PF
- Porter playing PF pushes Murray back to SF (what most Kings fans want to see)
- Porter is a good fit offensively next to Sabonis and can help keep the floor spaced to help Sabonis operate

Again, there is a lot to like from the Kings perspective. However, Scott Perry has talked about the type of players they want here and what he wants our identity to be. He’s repeated it multiple times. These are the attributes he continues to mention…

- Competitive
- Tough
- Team-Oriented
- Disciplined
- Accountable
- Professional

Does that sound like Michael Porter Jr.? I don’t think so but perhaps the trade is less about viewing Porter as a long term, core piece and more about the pros I mentioned above.

Personally, I’d do the trade, but I’m not convinced Scott Perry would.

I agree with all of this.

I like the fit but no way is perry trading derozan who he thinks fits his mold nearly perfectly for mpj who does not.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,471
And1: 14,205
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#5 » by HornetJail » Sun Sep 7, 2025 3:46 am

BK_2020 wrote:The Nets don't really have any incentive to reduce guaranteed salary and they would have to cut a guy if they break up MPJ into Monk and DDR for no reason.

which I think you have to do when Monk and DDR are objectively easier to trade to a playoff team for picks, compared to Porter

I refuse to believe the Nets don't have one player worth cutting
investigate Adam Silver
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,235
And1: 5,608
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#6 » by One_and_Done » Sun Sep 7, 2025 7:11 am

Nets say no. They're better off with MPJ on every level. Watch them rehab his value and flip him in a few years.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,506
And1: 3,787
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#7 » by Thaddy » Mon Sep 8, 2025 5:48 am

The Kings are going to low key be pretty good. They have a lot of pros and they will figure it out. DeRozan, Lavine, Sabonis, and Monk is quite the core. Then Murray, Schroeder, and their recent picks could round it out well.
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,193
And1: 836
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#8 » by sackings916 » Mon Sep 8, 2025 2:35 pm

Thaddy wrote:The Kings are going to low key be pretty good. They have a lot of pros and they will figure it out. DeRozan, Lavine, Sabonis, and Monk is quite the core. Then Murray, Schroeder, and their recent picks could round it out well.


I think they’ll be one of the best offenses in the league. The defense on the other hand…
GatherStepGuru
Sophomore
Posts: 165
And1: 68
Joined: Jun 23, 2024
         

Re: MPJ for Monk, DeRozan 

Post#9 » by GatherStepGuru » Yesterday 1:30 pm

MPJ has more value for the Nets than Monk and DDR at this point in their rebuild. I think hes gonna put up 20+ ppg this year.

Return to Trades and Transactions