The Master wrote:bonita_the_frog wrote:I think Alcaraz was just ruined mentally by the Olympics, because he would have felt like he let Nadal down by allowing Djokovic the Gold Medal (Nadal won 2008 Singles Gold and 2016 Doubles Gold, while Djokovic had never won a Gold), and lost early in the Olympic Doubles with Nadal too. I remember Alcaraz literally told the Spanish media that he would bring back the Gold Medal.
He was physically exhausted, first and foremost, he missed almost the full clay season in 2024 due to injury and played Roland Garros-Wimbledon without a serious preparation, it's understandable that he couldn't maintain this level for any longer. That's why after the Olympics he lost to 38yo Monfils and to Botic van Zandschulp at the US Open. But Novak was obviously great in Paris.Ryoga Hibiki wrote:How much is 2025 Novak worse than 2023 Novak?
I suspect not much, what changed is that now there are two athletes in his tier, but 15 years younger.
Pretty sure he wouldn't have won any major, against this version of Sincaraz.
He's significantly worse - but at the same time Alcaraz and Sinner are much better than they were in 2023, and Alcaraz was able to defeat Novak on Wimbledon while Sinner defeated him in virtual final of Davis Cup. He would've won some Slams, but not as many, this is a fair assessment, Alcaraz started to serve so much better since Wimbledon/clay season this year, Sinner is just a tier better all-round as a player.
But it's more and more apparent that we had the biggest gap ever in terms of emergence of 'historical' players (Djokovic - 1987, Sinner - 2001, 14 years) - and you can't even use that much 'but big3!' argument for this 2020-2023 era.
Let's hope we'll see someone new sooner rather than later, because there's no one on the horizon at this point who could challenge Sinner and Alcaraz.
Despite the age gap, I’d argue the 2004-2006 era was worse