TB wrote:they dont even want him post-Steph
They want to have clean books for 2027-28 so they can sign Giannis as a free agent.
Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51
TB wrote:they dont even want him post-Steph
xdrta+ wrote:Sorry, I don't buy it. Your own words are that GS will promise to "try to work together to get him somewhere he wants to go while GS gets value out of him." When they throw up their hands and say we just couldn't find a deal that works that way, that's the end of it. They trade him where they want. Other agents are focused on their own clients, if they can make a deal that works for them, they don't care what happened with Kuminga.
Twinkie defense wrote:TB wrote:they dont even want him post-Steph
They want to have clean books for 2027-28 so they can sign Giannis as a free agent.
HiRez wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:TB wrote:they dont even want him post-Steph
They want to have clean books for 2027-28 so they can sign Giannis as a free agent.
Man, I used to be a big fan of going after Giannis. But the dude is already showing signs he's peaked and will soon start declining (look at his DARKO graphs for example) and he's going to be 33 halfway through that season. That's the guy they're going to trade all their picks for and build around? IDK, feels like it's too late to me.
EvanZ wrote:xdrta+ wrote:EvanZ wrote:
I mean he objectively didn't get minutes in the exact moments they were trying to win in the playoffs until Steph got hurt and there was no choice. So...
So? Kerr's always trying to win. He obviously didn't think he'd help them win at that point.
Right. So what makes you think he will suddenly change his mind on JK? I'm not understanding that logic.
Twinkie defense wrote:HiRez wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:They want to have clean books for 2027-28 so they can sign Giannis as a free agent.
Man, I used to be a big fan of going after Giannis. But the dude is already showing signs he's peaked and will soon start declining (look at his DARKO graphs for example) and he's going to be 33 halfway through that season. That's the guy they're going to trade all their picks for and build around? IDK, feels like it's too late to me.
No picks! Giannis has a player option in 2027-28 and can become an unrestricted free agent.
Same with Jokic.
Onus wrote:Why not just give him the player option
HiRez wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:HiRez wrote:Man, I used to be a big fan of going after Giannis. But the dude is already showing signs he's peaked and will soon start declining (look at his DARKO graphs for example) and he's going to be 33 halfway through that season. That's the guy they're going to trade all their picks for and build around? IDK, feels like it's too late to me.
No picks! Giannis has a player option in 2027-28 and can become an unrestricted free agent.
Same with Jokic.
That's a good point, if he does become a FA. Still...33...same with Jokic as well. But wouldn't their teams try to S&T them before they walk, thus requiring picks if you want to compete against the rest of the league?
HiRez wrote:It's crazy they can't find a deal here. Seems the big sticking point for JK's camp is a team option, something which you unfortunately can't just split down the middle like a salary. Just offer a clean deal with no options and no no-trade clauses
NW wrote:whatisacenter wrote:NW wrote:
Then let him enjoy the QO and fighting it out in UFA next summer. There’s control or there’s money. He can’t have both. He’s not that good.
Lol, “there’s control or there’s money“ is exactly what JK has been telling the Warriors front office.
He wants three years with a players option in the third. Ain’t no “or” in this. He wants both. He ain’t getting it. The teams that want to give it him don’t have cap space so he’s not going there without the Warriors help
Turner and Kuminga have spent much of the summer requesting a player option as part of their preferred deals, sources said, showing a willingness to dip down into the $20 million per year range for it, but believing a team option deal should cost around $30 million per year. The Warriors have also viewed a player option as a nonstarter, sources said.
Twinkie defense wrote:Warriors offered three years with no options. AAV of $18 mil.
Three years is a risk for the Warriors but $18 mil per is a more tradeable contract.
EvanZ wrote:whatisacenter wrote:EvanZ wrote:
Sorry bru are you a Warriors fan or a JK fan? You don’t sound like a Warriors fan. So GTFO.
One can be both and nobody made you the gatekeeper.
You are clearly not both. You're rooting for Kuminga at the expense of the team. So you too, GFTO. Gatekeeper mode /activated.
statsman wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:Warriors offered three years with no options. AAV of $18 mil.
Three years is a risk for the Warriors but $18 mil per is a more tradeable contract.
When did the Warriors do that? I completely missed it.
Offer him the Kings' contract. 3 years, starting at $20M. For the Kings, that would be 3/63. For the Warriors, 3/65.
Their unwillingness to budge on the team option in those specific two offers is a major part of the holdup. Kuminga, gripping to the first lever of control he has had in his young career, is resistant to the idea of it, sources said. The only non-team option offer the Warriors have made to Kuminga is three years and $54 million fully guaranteed, sources said, an average of $18 million per season.
ahmetmekin wrote:I wanted this mfer gone or to take the QO, but with what Lacob is doing, it's looking very unlikely. Still hoping for the worst outcome for him in terms of his earnings.
Twinkie defense wrote:HiRez wrote:It's crazy they can't find a deal here. Seems the big sticking point for JK's camp is a team option, something which you unfortunately can't just split down the middle like a salary. Just offer a clean deal with no options and no no-trade clauses
Warriors offered three years with no options. AAV of $18 mil.
Three years is a risk for the Warriors but $18 mil per is a more tradeable contract.
He can also choose a shorter deal with a higher average dollar amount - which would seem to be the best option for Kuminga because it gives him a higher base salary to extend into his next contract and it gives him more power to choose his next team sooner.
If he doesn't want a team option he has that choice with the three-year deal.
If he wants to max out his guaranteed dollars he has that choice with the shorter deals.
There are a lot of options for Kuminga and the QO seems like the worst option for him - it reduces his salary, loses his Bird Rights, puts a cap on his future earnings.
Problem is Kuminga wants to put all the downside risk on the team rather than on his play
EvanZ wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:HiRez wrote:It's crazy they can't find a deal here. Seems the big sticking point for JK's camp is a team option, something which you unfortunately can't just split down the middle like a salary. Just offer a clean deal with no options and no no-trade clauses
Warriors offered three years with no options. AAV of $18 mil.
Three years is a risk for the Warriors but $18 mil per is a more tradeable contract.
He can also choose a shorter deal with a higher average dollar amount - which would seem to be the best option for Kuminga because it gives him a higher base salary to extend into his next contract and it gives him more power to choose his next team sooner.
If he doesn't want a team option he has that choice with the three-year deal.
If he wants to max out his guaranteed dollars he has that choice with the shorter deals.
There are a lot of options for Kuminga and the QO seems like the worst option for him - it reduces his salary, loses his Bird Rights, puts a cap on his future earnings.
Problem is Kuminga wants to put all the downside risk on the team rather than on his play
Yeah it just makes you wonder what contract does he think he can get next summer? How is he going to get more than 3-75 if he barely comes off the bench this season…
Return to Golden State Warriors