Bucks - Raptors

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,384
And1: 14,281
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#21 » by Godaddycurse » Fri Sep 19, 2025 1:12 pm

nolian wrote:too much messages are talking about "Barrett is better than Kuzma"
this is the base for the trade hypotesis

in fact the idea is that Bucks send a FRP (in addition to Kuzma and Jackson) to the Raptors
the FRP is 2031 when probably Bucks will not be a playoff team


So what is the point for toronto if the pick is lottery protected
nolian
Sophomore
Posts: 103
And1: 22
Joined: Dec 27, 2017
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#22 » by nolian » Fri Sep 19, 2025 1:37 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:
nolian wrote:too much messages are talking about "Barrett is better than Kuzma"
this is the base for the trade hypotesis

in fact the idea is that Bucks send a FRP (in addition to Kuzma and Jackson) to the Raptors
the FRP is 2031 when probably Bucks will not be a playoff team


So what is the point for toronto if the pick is lottery protected

first of all they can't resign Barrett, because,
when Barrett contract ended, they have 146M$ with only 7 players, so if they resign Barret, they will be near to 200M with only 8 players

in second, the FRP is protected, but like other times happen, if the pick doesn't materialize in 2031, will replicated in next year with less protection

PS: sometimes a lottery protected pick, of a lottery team, is better than an unprotected FRP of a contender team (for example look at the 2025 Pistons FRP sent from the Knicks to the Timberwolves, and look at the unprotected FRP sent from the Timberwolves to the Jazz)
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,384
And1: 14,281
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#23 » by Godaddycurse » Fri Sep 19, 2025 2:09 pm

nolian wrote:
Godaddycurse wrote:
nolian wrote:too much messages are talking about "Barrett is better than Kuzma"
this is the base for the trade hypotesis

in fact the idea is that Bucks send a FRP (in addition to Kuzma and Jackson) to the Raptors
the FRP is 2031 when probably Bucks will not be a playoff team


So what is the point for toronto if the pick is lottery protected

first of all they can't resign Barrett, because,
when Barrett contract ended, they have 146M$ with only 7 players, so if they resign Barret, they will be near to 200M with only 8 players

in second, the FRP is protected, but like other times happen, if the pick doesn't materialize in 2031, will replicated in next year with less protection

PS: sometimes a lottery protected pick, of a lottery team, is better than an unprotected FRP of a contender team (for example look at the 2025 Pistons FRP sent from the Knicks to the Timberwolves, and look at the unprotected FRP sent from the Timberwolves to the Jazz)


OP is phrased like the pick doesnt carry over.
We can re-sign barrett if we give up on agbaji or Dick, or if Ingram leaves in FA.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,367
And1: 20,886
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#24 » by AussieBuck » Sat Sep 20, 2025 6:48 am

The Bucks aren't blowing one the few trade assets we have on a Barrett level guy regardless of how bad Kuzma is.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,976
And1: 4,051
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#25 » by Thaddy » Sat Sep 20, 2025 8:03 am

AussieBuck wrote:The Bucks aren't blowing one the few trade assets we have on a Barrett level guy regardless of how bad Kuzma is.

Kuzma is probably the worst big contract player in the NBA. RJ improved last year and in general since he's been in the Raptors. They'll probably keep and extend him for a lower amount than he's getting now. He will be their second option next season and he's been great in that role for them before. His rim pressure or driving ability works well with Barnes. He is very likely to have a career year based on everything that's going on.
User avatar
giannis and 1
Starter
Posts: 2,397
And1: 1,196
Joined: Jan 06, 2019
Location: Vancouver, BC
       

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#26 » by giannis and 1 » Sat Sep 20, 2025 2:12 pm

nolian wrote:RJBarret x K.Kuzma + A.Jackson/T.Smith + future FPR lottery protected

why for Raptors
they have too much player in back court: Quicley, Shaed, Dick, -Barrett-, Walter, Agbaji, Roddy
they have Ingram and and Barnes at SFn and in addition Rossy, Murray-Boyles, Battle
they can't re-sign Barrett after this contract because they already have a lot of cap invested on Barnes, Ingram, Quickley, so the can trade Barrett to invest in other role, and take a FRP

why for Bucks
Kuzma is out of project
Barrett is better than anyone other of thier backcourt


RAPTORS
Dick, Ingram, Barnes, Kuzma, Poetl
Quickley, Walter, Shaed, Agbaji, Battle, Murray-Boyles, Mogbo, Mamukelashvili

BUCKS
ColeAnthony, Barrett, Prince, Giannis, Turner
Rollins, K.PorterJr, G.TrentJr, AJGreen, Coffey, Portis

Really bad for the Bucks. No thanks.

You can have Smith for a protected 2nd.
still learning the game

Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,367
And1: 20,886
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#27 » by AussieBuck » Sat Sep 20, 2025 7:36 pm

Thaddy wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:The Bucks aren't blowing one the few trade assets we have on a Barrett level guy regardless of how bad Kuzma is.

Kuzma is probably the worst big contract player in the NBA. RJ improved last year and in general since he's been in the Raptors. They'll probably keep and extend him for a lower amount than he's getting now. He will be their second option next season and he's been great in that role for them before. His rim pressure or driving ability works well with Barnes. He is very likely to have a career year based on everything that's going on.

All of this could be true and it doesn't impact on what I have posted at all. The bucks can just play Kuzma 10-15 minutes a game at SF or not at all and then punt him as a mid range contract expiring after the season instead of blowing a rare asset on an expensive mediocre player.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,976
And1: 4,051
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#28 » by Thaddy » Sat Sep 20, 2025 8:40 pm

AussieBuck wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:The Bucks aren't blowing one the few trade assets we have on a Barrett level guy regardless of how bad Kuzma is.

Kuzma is probably the worst big contract player in the NBA. RJ improved last year and in general since he's been in the Raptors. They'll probably keep and extend him for a lower amount than he's getting now. He will be their second option next season and he's been great in that role for them before. His rim pressure or driving ability works well with Barnes. He is very likely to have a career year based on everything that's going on.

All of this could be true and it doesn't impact on what I have posted at all. The bucks can just play Kuzma 10-15 minutes a game at SF or not at all and then punt him as a mid range contract expiring after the season instead of blowing a rare asset on an expensive mediocre player.

Kuzma and RJ have the same years left. Kuzma is older and worse. RJ was a top 3 pick in his draft. In what world does a non lottery first (which might not even convey) worth RJ?

Have you looked at RJs stats when he first arrived in Toronto? Massive improvement. Chances are you won't be finding a better player than him in the late teens to early 20s.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,367
And1: 20,886
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#29 » by AussieBuck » Sat Sep 20, 2025 8:49 pm

Thaddy wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Thaddy wrote:Kuzma is probably the worst big contract player in the NBA. RJ improved last year and in general since he's been in the Raptors. They'll probably keep and extend him for a lower amount than he's getting now. He will be their second option next season and he's been great in that role for them before. His rim pressure or driving ability works well with Barnes. He is very likely to have a career year based on everything that's going on.

All of this could be true and it doesn't impact on what I have posted at all. The bucks can just play Kuzma 10-15 minutes a game at SF or not at all and then punt him as a mid range contract expiring after the season instead of blowing a rare asset on an expensive mediocre player.

Kuzma and RJ have the same years left. Kuzma is older and worse. RJ was a top 3 pick in his draft. In what world does a non lottery first (which might not even convey) worth RJ?

Have you looked at RJs stats when he first arrived in Toronto? Massive improvement. Chances are you won't be finding a better player than him in the late teens to early 20s.

We won't use the pick, we'll package it with salary and a swap for a needle mover if/when one comes up. We have one more shot to fire, I doubt Barrett will be it unless there's a reason for a panic move
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,976
And1: 4,051
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#30 » by Thaddy » Sun Sep 21, 2025 12:03 am

AussieBuck wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:All of this could be true and it doesn't impact on what I have posted at all. The bucks can just play Kuzma 10-15 minutes a game at SF or not at all and then punt him as a mid range contract expiring after the season instead of blowing a rare asset on an expensive mediocre player.

Kuzma and RJ have the same years left. Kuzma is older and worse. RJ was a top 3 pick in his draft. In what world does a non lottery first (which might not even convey) worth RJ?

Have you looked at RJs stats when he first arrived in Toronto? Massive improvement. Chances are you won't be finding a better player than him in the late teens to early 20s.

We won't use the pick, we'll package it with salary and a swap for a needle mover if/when one comes up. We have one more shot to fire, I doubt Barrett will be it unless there's a reason for a panic move

RJ is a needle mover and continues to project as being one. He was a positive for the first time in his career when he was initially traded to Toronto. Despite a down year that was filled with injury and thus removed him from his expected role he continued to be a positive impact player last year with better defense. His value is higher than a mid to late first. The same goes for any "needle mover" you'll see shopped around in the league.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,380
And1: 36,370
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#31 » by jbk1234 » Sun Sep 21, 2025 1:40 pm

Thaddy wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Thaddy wrote:Kuzma and RJ have the same years left. Kuzma is older and worse. RJ was a top 3 pick in his draft. In what world does a non lottery first (which might not even convey) worth RJ?

Have you looked at RJs stats when he first arrived in Toronto? Massive improvement. Chances are you won't be finding a better player than him in the late teens to early 20s.

We won't use the pick, we'll package it with salary and a swap for a needle mover if/when one comes up. We have one more shot to fire, I doubt Barrett will be it unless there's a reason for a panic move

RJ is a needle mover and continues to project as being one. He was a positive for the first time in his career when he was initially traded to Toronto. Despite a down year that was filled with injury and thus removed him from his expected role he continued to be a positive impact player last year with better defense. His value is higher than a mid to late first. The same goes for any "needle mover" you'll see shopped around in the league.


If the rest of the NBA, or even a single team agreed with your assessment of Barret, he'd no longer be on the Raptors roster.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,976
And1: 4,051
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#32 » by Thaddy » Sun Sep 21, 2025 3:28 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:We won't use the pick, we'll package it with salary and a swap for a needle mover if/when one comes up. We have one more shot to fire, I doubt Barrett will be it unless there's a reason for a panic move

RJ is a needle mover and continues to project as being one. He was a positive for the first time in his career when he was initially traded to Toronto. Despite a down year that was filled with injury and thus removed him from his expected role he continued to be a positive impact player last year with better defense. His value is higher than a mid to late first. The same goes for any "needle mover" you'll see shopped around in the league.


If the rest of the NBA, or even a single team agreed with your assessment of Barret, he'd no longer be on the Raptors roster.

Most teams are holding out and low balling until the deadline now. The Raptors have fielded calls and maintained a high asking price.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,979
And1: 14,326
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#33 » by JRoy » Sun Sep 21, 2025 4:20 pm

Thaddy wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Thaddy wrote:Kuzma is probably the worst big contract player in the NBA. RJ improved last year and in general since he's been in the Raptors. They'll probably keep and extend him for a lower amount than he's getting now. He will be their second option next season and he's been great in that role for them before. His rim pressure or driving ability works well with Barnes. He is very likely to have a career year based on everything that's going on.

All of this could be true and it doesn't impact on what I have posted at all. The bucks can just play Kuzma 10-15 minutes a game at SF or not at all and then punt him as a mid range contract expiring after the season instead of blowing a rare asset on an expensive mediocre player.

Kuzma and RJ have the same years left. Kuzma is older and worse. RJ was a top 3 pick in his draft. In what world does a non lottery first (which might not even convey) worth RJ?

Have you looked at RJs stats when he first arrived in Toronto? Massive improvement. Chances are you won't be finding a better player than him in the late teens to early 20s.


RJs mom wouldn’t give a lotto pick for him.

If TOR gets an offer for any FRP likely to convey for RJ they should take it.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Crymson
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,834
And1: 778
Joined: Apr 17, 2016

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#34 » by Crymson » Sun Sep 21, 2025 7:13 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:Kuzma is so bad and East is wide open enough this year that it might make a difference between a first round exit vs deeper run. A lottery protected first in 2031 isnt worth very much either. Solid chance it wont convey if Giannis is post prime/goes elsewhere.

I would pass for raptors since we are trying to win this year


Exchanging Kuzma for Barrett isn't going to make the Bucks a contender. The Bucks having gotten a whole lot worse is one of the reasons for the East being so weak next season.

That said, the Bucks also have no business giving away a future 1st of any sort at this point. And Barrett ain't worth that in the first place.
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,976
And1: 4,051
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#35 » by Thaddy » Sun Sep 21, 2025 7:16 pm

JRoy wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:All of this could be true and it doesn't impact on what I have posted at all. The bucks can just play Kuzma 10-15 minutes a game at SF or not at all and then punt him as a mid range contract expiring after the season instead of blowing a rare asset on an expensive mediocre player.

Kuzma and RJ have the same years left. Kuzma is older and worse. RJ was a top 3 pick in his draft. In what world does a non lottery first (which might not even convey) worth RJ?

Have you looked at RJs stats when he first arrived in Toronto? Massive improvement. Chances are you won't be finding a better player than him in the late teens to early 20s.


RJs mom wouldn’t give a lotto pick for him.

If TOR gets an offer for any FRP likely to convey for RJ they should take it.

The chance you find a better player than RJ from 10th to 30th in the draft is less than 5%. As I said he's still young and he's shown growth after the trade to Toronto on both ends. That's all you can really hope for.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,979
And1: 14,326
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#36 » by JRoy » Sun Sep 21, 2025 7:28 pm

Thaddy wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Thaddy wrote:Kuzma and RJ have the same years left. Kuzma is older and worse. RJ was a top 3 pick in his draft. In what world does a non lottery first (which might not even convey) worth RJ?

Have you looked at RJs stats when he first arrived in Toronto? Massive improvement. Chances are you won't be finding a better player than him in the late teens to early 20s.


RJs mom wouldn’t give a lotto pick for him.

If TOR gets an offer for any FRP likely to convey for RJ they should take it.

The chance you find a better player than RJ from 10th to 30th in the draft is less than 5%. As I said he's still young and he's shown growth after the trade to Toronto on both ends. That's all you can really hope for.


Not sure I agree with your odds.

You do get a less expansive asset, easy to combine with other assets.

RJ is pretty much salary filler.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,976
And1: 4,051
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#37 » by Thaddy » Sun Sep 21, 2025 11:59 pm

JRoy wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
JRoy wrote:
RJs mom wouldn’t give a lotto pick for him.

If TOR gets an offer for any FRP likely to convey for RJ they should take it.

The chance you find a better player than RJ from 10th to 30th in the draft is less than 5%. As I said he's still young and he's shown growth after the trade to Toronto on both ends. That's all you can really hope for.


Not sure I agree with your odds.

You do get a less expansive asset, easy to combine with other assets.

RJ is pretty much salary filler.

RJ as a stronger starter with potential. In the last 2 drafts other than Keyonte George no one had more than 41 starts. A non lottery pick just isn't worth it.

When RJ was first traded to the Raptors he did great. He played as a lower option and had insane numbers on a ample sample size. 22/6/4 55% FG and 3P was 40%
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,979
And1: 14,326
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#38 » by JRoy » Mon Sep 22, 2025 12:01 am

Thaddy wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Thaddy wrote:The chance you find a better player than RJ from 10th to 30th in the draft is less than 5%. As I said he's still young and he's shown growth after the trade to Toronto on both ends. That's all you can really hope for.


Not sure I agree with your odds.

You do get a less expansive asset, easy to combine with other assets.

RJ is pretty much salary filler.

RJ as a stronger starter with potential. In the last 2 drafts other than Keyonte George no one had more than 41 starts. A non lottery pick just isn't worth it.

When RJ was first traded to the Raptors he did great. He played as a lower option and had insane numbers on a ample sample size. 22/6/4 55% FG and 3P was 40%


Then why are you trying to move him?

Not one non TOR fan in this thread has offered anything of value for RJ.

That is not because they want RJ at a discount.

It’s because they don’t want him at all.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,384
And1: 14,281
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#39 » by Godaddycurse » Mon Sep 22, 2025 12:54 am

JRoy wrote:
Thaddy wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Not sure I agree with your odds.

You do get a less expansive asset, easy to combine with other assets.

RJ is pretty much salary filler.

RJ as a stronger starter with potential. In the last 2 drafts other than Keyonte George no one had more than 41 starts. A non lottery pick just isn't worth it.

When RJ was first traded to the Raptors he did great. He played as a lower option and had insane numbers on a ample sample size. 22/6/4 55% FG and 3P was 40%


Then why are you trying to move him?

Not one non TOR fan in this thread has offered anything of value for RJ.

That is not because they want RJ at a discount.

It’s because they don’t want him at all.


Toronto has been shopping him to get an upgrade, not for picks/to tank. they tried to attach their lotto pick to him to get white for example. I think if they cant find an obvious upgrade the team is happy to keep him and see how he fares in lower usage role/hope he becomes team canada version.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,979
And1: 14,326
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Bucks - Raptors 

Post#40 » by JRoy » Mon Sep 22, 2025 1:15 am

Godaddycurse wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Thaddy wrote:RJ as a stronger starter with potential. In the last 2 drafts other than Keyonte George no one had more than 41 starts. A non lottery pick just isn't worth it.

When RJ was first traded to the Raptors he did great. He played as a lower option and had insane numbers on a ample sample size. 22/6/4 55% FG and 3P was 40%


Then why are you trying to move him?

Not one non TOR fan in this thread has offered anything of value for RJ.

That is not because they want RJ at a discount.

It’s because they don’t want him at all.


Toronto has been shopping him to get an upgrade, not for picks/to tank. they tried to attach their lotto pick to him to get white for example. I think if they cant find an obvious upgrade the team is happy to keep him and see how he fares in lower usage role/hope he becomes team canada version.


That seems reasonable.

He’d be a solid 6th man but he’s paid too much.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.

Return to Trades and Transactions