tedbrogen wrote:Plossum wrote:they need something to link the Clippers to the deal.
How about a letter signed by the Clippers CEO buying additional carbon credits beyond what they were required to two years before the stadium was complete right before another payment to Kawhi was due?
 
You don’t need to convince me they did it. 
But Ballmer can easily say he thought it was a good long term investment to trade later. How does the NBA demonstrate the Clips purchasing those carbon credits was part of the scheme to circumvent the cap? 
Again, Silver has gone on the record to say the league needs clear evidence before punishing the clippers. From what I know of dealing with lawyers for many decades is they won’t see what’s currently available as clear proof. But I accept that some people think the evidence is already clear enough.
Edit: here is Silver’s quote:
"The burden is on the league if we're going to discipline a team, an owner, a player or any constituent members of the league," Silver said during his annual news conference at the conclusion of the league's board of governors meetings in midtown Manhattan. "I think as with any process that requires a fundamental sense of fairness, the burden should be on the party that is, in essence, bringing those charges."
What Silver has not said is what he considers clear evidence. The totality of the circumstantial evidence may be enough. But I suspect it won’t.