grimlock wrote:This is the Silvers Epstein files. It ain't going away.
Is Kawhi the underage girl in this scenario?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
grimlock wrote:This is the Silvers Epstein files. It ain't going away.
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom
The Master wrote:manlisten wrote:The owners collectively agreed to a CBA that is almost singularly intended to prevent Ballmer from having a competitive advantage. Pretty sure they won't be ok with him circumventing the cap, regardless of what douchebags like Ishbia and Cuban are trying to sell.
1. Unfortunately, it seems likely that you can after all find 8 douchebags like Cuban and Ishbia, and it would somehow limit what the NBA can do with Ballmer.
2. Also, considering:
- ESPN downplaying the whole scandal,
- Silver being very 'defensive' about everything Aspiration-related,
- Cuban and Ishbia willing to make idiots out of themselves by the way they defend Ballmer,
- intel about potentially very long investigation incoming,
it's hard not to suspect what is the ultimate goal here. But maybe I'm pessimistic, you don't need a 3/4 majority to punish Ballmer for cap circumvention, this is correct.
When the New York Knicks were investigated for tampering on Jalen Brunson, for instance, that investigation opened on Aug. 6, 2022 and closed on Dec. 21, 2022. For the 76ers with P.J. Tucker and Danuel House, the investigation opened on Jul 29, 2022 and closed on Oct. 31, 2022. Essentially, even a tampering investigation typically takes four or five months. A cap circumvention investigation, especially one featuring a bankrupt company and criminal proceedings, is substantially more complicated and may well involve CBA-induced arbitration. This very likely isn't getting solved before the season begins. For all we know, it might not get solved before the season even ends.
og15 wrote:The Master wrote:manlisten wrote:The owners collectively agreed to a CBA that is almost singularly intended to prevent Ballmer from having a competitive advantage. Pretty sure they won't be ok with him circumventing the cap, regardless of what douchebags like Ishbia and Cuban are trying to sell.
1. Unfortunately, it seems likely that you can after all find 8 douchebags like Cuban and Ishbia, and it would somehow limit what the NBA can do with Ballmer.
2. Also, considering:
- ESPN downplaying the whole scandal,
- Silver being very 'defensive' about everything Aspiration-related,
- Cuban and Ishbia willing to make idiots out of themselves by the way they defend Ballmer,
- intel about potentially very long investigation incoming,
it's hard not to suspect what is the ultimate goal here. But maybe I'm pessimistic, you don't need a 3/4 majority to punish Ballmer for cap circumvention, this is correct.
It seems to always be long, so I'm not sure that it means much:When the New York Knicks were investigated for tampering on Jalen Brunson, for instance, that investigation opened on Aug. 6, 2022 and closed on Dec. 21, 2022. For the 76ers with P.J. Tucker and Danuel House, the investigation opened on Jul 29, 2022 and closed on Oct. 31, 2022. Essentially, even a tampering investigation typically takes four or five months. A cap circumvention investigation, especially one featuring a bankrupt company and criminal proceedings, is substantially more complicated and may well involve CBA-induced arbitration. This very likely isn't getting solved before the season begins. For all we know, it might not get solved before the season even ends.
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/kawhi-leonard-investigation-what-potential-punishments-could-mean-for-the-clippers-steve-ballmer-and-the-nba/
Enso wrote:Should be addressed soon, doubt league will allow this to go into the season and be a distraction. Reporters will keep asking about it.
Enso wrote:Should be addressed soon, doubt league will allow this to go into the season and be a distraction. Reporters will keep asking about it.
drekwins wrote:Enso wrote:Should be addressed soon, doubt league will allow this to go into the season and be a distraction. Reporters will keep asking about it.
I don’t think that the NBA believes that. It’s obvious that all ESPN reporting is compromised. This is going to have to be driven by the Barstools, Pablo’s, other independents and, perhaps, larger reporting outlets (New York Times, Washington Post, etc.).
I used to believe in independent media and integrity. With that said, we are seeing an attack on that institution as more and more media outlets partner with the organizations that they report on, instead of remaining objective, with scrutinization. I’m sure that they believe that they can help each other succeed by playing nice together. It’s less risky. Guaranteed $$$ for both.
This is why we need competition and non-monopolized industries in America… especially in the press. To keep everyone in check. There should be 50 top reporters gunning for this story to find out every little detail and expose it… doing so would propel their career. Yet, it feels like 95% are compromised and lack the drive + integrity to do so. It’s a sad time.
AFM wrote:Stern would have had everyone involved publicly flogged and exiled like Napoleon by now.
Roscoe Sheed wrote:AFM wrote:Stern would have had everyone involved publicly flogged and exiled like Napoleon by now.
Stern was far from a paragon of integrity- the most horrendous officiating occurred during his tenure (93 Suns vs. Sonics, 02 Lakers vs. Kings, 06 Mavs vs Heat), he let Sterling stay as owner despite all of his poor conduct and allowed the Sonics to move out of Seattle. He definitely had a crooked side to him as well.
Roscoe Sheed wrote:AFM wrote:Stern would have had everyone involved publicly flogged and exiled like Napoleon by now.
Stern was far from a paragon of integrity- the most horrendous officiating occurred during his tenure (93 Suns vs. Sonics, 02 Lakers vs. Kings, 06 Mavs vs Heat), he let Sterling stay as owner despite all of his poor conduct and allowed the Sonics to move out of Seattle. He definitely had a crooked side to him as well.
lonzo_pelota wrote:When is Uncle Dennis going to speak and give his input, He's an alleged nefarious smoking gun collecting funds in this equation.