Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,622
- And1: 5,435
- Joined: Jul 22, 2019
-
Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
IMHO: the birds of prey would be a better interpretation. Just like the Mighty Ducks changing their names to the Ducks as well as the Devil Rays changing their name to the Rays were positive moves. The former felt like some 90's comic book concept floating in the middle of the traditions of their respective sports and stuck out like sore thumbs. However, velociraptors are cool, so I'm open to other ideas. And I get that, as NY fan, it's not really my place to weigh in.
Anyway, Happy New Season, everyone. Pretty jazzed to watched the Knicks play basketball this week.
Anyway, Happy New Season, everyone. Pretty jazzed to watched the Knicks play basketball this week.
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,668
- And1: 22,917
- Joined: Jun 06, 2001
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
The logo says it all.
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?
Please advise….
Dan G.
Please advise….
Dan G.
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,856
- And1: 36,286
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Wait, what are we talking about?
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,622
- And1: 5,435
- Joined: Jul 22, 2019
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Zeno wrote:The logo says it all.
Hmm... maybe a better title is "Should the Toronto Raptors..." but I can probably guess the response.

UcanUwill wrote:Wait, what are we talking about?
Raptors, bro. The word can refer to birds or dinosaurs. Which would you name your bball team after?
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,567
- And1: 24,102
- Joined: Jul 22, 2006
- Location: Land of Llamas
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
It’s kind of funny how messed up things have gotten with team names due to moves over the year.
Utah known for its wonderful Jazz scene
Los Angeles is famous for its Lakes
Memphis renowned for Grizzly Bears
Utah known for its wonderful Jazz scene
Los Angeles is famous for its Lakes
Memphis renowned for Grizzly Bears
Gerald Green Loves LLamas!
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- Sofia
- GOTB: Mean Girls
- Posts: 30,405
- And1: 34,254
- Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Life, uh, finds a way
Spoiler:
lottery is rigged militia
President of the Pharmcat Fanclub
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
President of the Pharmcat Fanclub
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,622
- And1: 5,435
- Joined: Jul 22, 2019
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Infinite Llamas wrote:It’s kind of funny how messed up things have gotten with team names due to moves over the year.
Utah known for its wonderful Jazz scene
Los Angeles is famous for its Lakes
Memphis renowned for Grizzly Bears
100%. Or as Trey Parker and Matt Stone said, "the New Orleans Jazz moved to Salt Lake City, where they don't allow music."
Interestingly, the Utahraptor was an actual dinosaur.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utahraptor
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- chilluminati
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,432
- And1: 6,143
- Joined: Feb 15, 2021
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
The Raptors? They should rename. They have a worse negative wingspan than Desmond Bane.

Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,856
- And1: 36,286
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
RoxSteady wrote:Zeno wrote:The logo says it all.
Hmm... maybe a better title is "Should the Toronto Raptors..." but I can probably guess the response.. It's OK, I'll be the minority.
UcanUwill wrote:Wait, what are we talking about?
Raptors, bro. The word can refer to birds or dinosaurs. Which would you name your bball team after?
Are there birds called Raptors? I mean I know Raptors are bird ancestors, but they are dinosaurs as I understand it. When I think of "Raptors'' I think of this :

Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,856
- And1: 36,286
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
chilluminati wrote:The Raptors? They should rename. They have a worse negative wingspan than Desmond Bane.
Toronto Pterodactyls
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- bisme37
- Forum Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 24,781
- And1: 71,986
- Joined: May 24, 2014
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Ya know, now that I think of it, it's weird that the team is named Raptors but the mascot is clearly not a raptor. All dinosaurs are not the same, Toronto basketball team!
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,567
- And1: 24,102
- Joined: Jul 22, 2006
- Location: Land of Llamas
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
bisme37 wrote:Ya know, now that I think of it, it's weird that the team is named Raptors but the mascot is clearly not a raptor. All dinosaurs are not the same, Toronto basketball team!
I believe they did a poll for the team name and Raptors were picked because Jurassic Park was big at the time but I might be misremembering it.
Gerald Green Loves LLamas!
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,604
- And1: 43,852
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
It really should be the Utah Raptors
IYKYK
IYKYK
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 96
- And1: 223
- Joined: Dec 13, 2020
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
UcanUwill wrote:RoxSteady wrote:Zeno wrote:The logo says it all.
Hmm... maybe a better title is "Should the Toronto Raptors..." but I can probably guess the response.. It's OK, I'll be the minority.
UcanUwill wrote:Wait, what are we talking about?
Raptors, bro. The word can refer to birds or dinosaurs. Which would you name your bball team after?
Are there birds called Raptors? I mean I know Raptors are bird ancestors, but they are dinosaurs as I understand it. When I think of "Raptors'' I think of this :
"Raptor" is synonymous for "bird of prey", so eagles, falcons, hawks, etc. are all "raptors".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_of_prey
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- bisme37
- Forum Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 24,781
- And1: 71,986
- Joined: May 24, 2014
-
Re: Are the Toronto Raptors Now Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
FOB wrote:UcanUwill wrote:RoxSteady wrote:Hmm... maybe a better title is "Should the Toronto Raptors..." but I can probably guess the response.. It's OK, I'll be the minority.
Raptors, bro. The word can refer to birds or dinosaurs. Which would you name your bball team after?
Are there birds called Raptors? I mean I know Raptors are bird ancestors, but they are dinosaurs as I understand it. When I think of "Raptors'' I think of this :
"Raptor" is synonymous for "bird of prey", so eagles, falcons, hawks, etc. are all "raptors".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_of_prey
So basically NOT this thing:

Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- JDR720
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 44,198
- And1: 45,790
- Joined: Jul 09, 2013
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Toronto Redbirds.
Then they can have a rivalry with the Toronto Bluejays as the best colored bird.
Then they can have a rivalry with the Toronto Bluejays as the best colored bird.
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- kwajo
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,543
- And1: 13,292
- Joined: Apr 29, 2015
- Location: Floating on the Bay of Fundy
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
I dunno, the current Instagram logo for the team could go either way I guess:


https://www.instagram.com/raptors/


https://www.instagram.com/raptors/
"They left them homeless, down and out,
In their crumbling empire"
In their crumbling empire"
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 683
- And1: 761
- Joined: Dec 10, 2005
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
I think it would be great if the Raptors followed the tradition of several storied franchises now that they've established more of a franchise history. It's been said that Jerry Sloan is the inspiration for the Chicago Bulls logo. From my eyes, the Pelicans logo was meant to resemble Anthony Davis. The Clippers logo was once a blatant ripoff of the Lakers. And of course Jerry West is the legendary stencil for the NBA logo.
Why can't a redesign of the Raptors logo be created in the image of Gradey Dick? Might be premature speculation, but if he continues his upward trajectory he could come out to be an iconic figure in the legacy of Toronto basketballs.
Why can't a redesign of the Raptors logo be created in the image of Gradey Dick? Might be premature speculation, but if he continues his upward trajectory he could come out to be an iconic figure in the legacy of Toronto basketballs.
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
- LuDux1
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,850
- And1: 4,851
- Joined: Mar 22, 2009
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,178
- And1: 3,329
- Joined: May 16, 2006
-
Re: Should the Toronto Raptors Be Considered Birds of Prey or Are They Still Only Velociraptors?
Definitely dinosaur only. They were riding the Jurassic Park wave in the 90s and they are stuck with it.