Image ImageImage Image

Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 26,909
And1: 15,948
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#241 » by Ice Man » Sat Sep 27, 2025 11:57 am

DuckIII wrote:He might flat out suck balls to the point he gets waived and goes back down under for the rest of his career. Ben Simmons-ish.


That seems unlikely. Aside from injuries, which I grant is always a possibility, Ben fell apart because of bad attitude and because he positively, absolutely cannot make jump shots (or even take them). Neither are true of Giddey.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,608
And1: 36,952
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#242 » by DuckIII » Sat Sep 27, 2025 4:15 pm

Ice Man wrote:
DuckIII wrote:He might flat out suck balls to the point he gets waived and goes back down under for the rest of his career. Ben Simmons-ish.


That seems unlikely. Aside from injuries, which I grant is always a possibility, Ben fell apart because of bad attitude and because he positively, absolutely cannot make jump shots (or even take them). Neither are true of Giddey.


I wasn’t being serious.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 26,909
And1: 15,948
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#243 » by Ice Man » Sat Sep 27, 2025 8:36 pm

DuckIII wrote:
Ice Man wrote:
DuckIII wrote:He might flat out suck balls to the point he gets waived and goes back down under for the rest of his career. Ben Simmons-ish.


That seems unlikely. Aside from injuries, which I grant is always a possibility, Ben fell apart because of bad attitude and because he positively, absolutely cannot make jump shots (or even take them). Neither are true of Giddey.


I wasn’t being serious.


That's what I get for reading too quickly.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,329
And1: 6,369
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#244 » by Indomitable » Sat Sep 27, 2025 9:57 pm

dougthonus wrote:I'm not the biggest Giddey guy, but he didn't make ESPN's top 100 players. That feels way off to me.

Popularity contest after the top 10.
:banghead:
MissileMike
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,475
And1: 1,282
Joined: Feb 25, 2002

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#245 » by MissileMike » Tue Sep 30, 2025 10:48 pm

Read on Twitter


This is as good of place as any to post this I guess, since it's relevant.
DropStep
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 311
Joined: Feb 28, 2009

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#246 » by DropStep » Tue Sep 30, 2025 11:06 pm

MissileMike wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is as good of place as any to post this I guess, since it's relevant.


Designed to be ripped up in favor of a bigger extension...or, turn him into an expiring contract, if that's the way the winds blow.

A total wait and see contract for everybody. The Warriors should have folded Kuminga's contract offer into an origami shrug emoji. :dontknow:
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 21,033
And1: 15,435
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#247 » by kodo » Tue Sep 30, 2025 11:26 pm

Interesting so basically GS won their game of chicken w/ JK's QO threat.
Giddey basically won his game of chicken, although not the same situation since Chicago hasn't been shy in saying they want him long term and see him as one of our two potential stars.
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 22,122
And1: 8,857
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#248 » by Stratmaster » Wed Oct 1, 2025 12:42 pm

kodo wrote:Interesting so basically GS won their game of chicken w/ JK's QO threat.
Giddey basically won his game of chicken, although not the same situation since Chicago hasn't been shy in saying they want him long term and see him as one of our two potential stars.


I'm confused. Instead of "proving himself" by taking the QO, JK is getting 24-25 million to prove himself. He turned down 3/75 and will have control after 2 seasons instead of 3. GS original 2 year offer was said to be 40 mil. I guess since it was rumored they don't want him at all the team option is a win. But if you don't want him at all...then...

Don't take that wrong. I don't think JK won the negotiations by any means. I think both sides knew they had to do something and met in the middle.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,780
And1: 18,859
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#249 » by dougthonus » Wed Oct 1, 2025 3:14 pm

kodo wrote:Interesting so basically GS won their game of chicken w/ JK's QO threat.
Giddey basically won his game of chicken, although not the same situation since Chicago hasn't been shy in saying they want him long term and see him as one of our two potential stars.


I noted awhile back that it was inevitable that GS would "win", because GS wasn't offering him a bad deal.

If he took the QO, he would need to sign a max deal the next year to make up for the money he'd lose on this two year deal. That would be insane. There was no upside for Kuminga to do anything other than take this two year deal, he had no path to win by taking the QO no matter how well he played.

If I were GS, I'd have probably played even more hardball and lowered this offer to something where there was some tiny wiggle room to win on the QO, but very small, say 2/42M so that I had more flexibility under the apron this year. Even that would have been a really good deal under the circumstances as Kuminga would need over 34.1M the following year to break even (highly unlikely).

Ultimately, I think GS took the 0 risk path by offering him the deal that Kuminga would simply be hurting himself significantly if he turned it down with no path to come out ahead and then called his bluff because they knew mathematically there was no way for him to come out ahead.
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,640
And1: 3,930
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#250 » by jnrjr79 » Wed Oct 1, 2025 3:29 pm

dougthonus wrote:
kodo wrote:Interesting so basically GS won their game of chicken w/ JK's QO threat.
Giddey basically won his game of chicken, although not the same situation since Chicago hasn't been shy in saying they want him long term and see him as one of our two potential stars.


I noted awhile back that it was inevitable that GS would "win", because GS wasn't offering him a bad deal.

If he took the QO, he would need to sign a max deal the next year to make up for the money he'd lose on this two year deal. That would be insane. There was no upside for Kuminga to do anything other than take this two year deal, he had no path to win by taking the QO no matter how well he played.

If I were GS, I'd have probably played even more hardball and lowered this offer to something where there was some tiny wiggle room to win on the QO, but very small, say 2/42M so that I had more flexibility under the apron this year. Even that would have been a really good deal under the circumstances as Kuminga would need over 34.1M the following year to break even (highly unlikely).

Ultimately, I think GS took the 0 risk path by offering him the deal that Kuminga would simply be hurting himself significantly if he turned it down with no path to come out ahead and then called his bluff because they knew mathematically there was no way for him to come out ahead.


Yeah, it seems like GS's real concern was just making sure they did not sign Kuminga to a deal large enough to screw up their acquisition of Horford, given their financial constraints. They didn't really have any wiggle room to go above this, and even this deal seems to be affecting the timing of when they can bring in Seth Curry.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,291
And1: 9,151
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#251 » by sco » Wed Oct 1, 2025 3:46 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
kodo wrote:Interesting so basically GS won their game of chicken w/ JK's QO threat.
Giddey basically won his game of chicken, although not the same situation since Chicago hasn't been shy in saying they want him long term and see him as one of our two potential stars.


I noted awhile back that it was inevitable that GS would "win", because GS wasn't offering him a bad deal.

If he took the QO, he would need to sign a max deal the next year to make up for the money he'd lose on this two year deal. That would be insane. There was no upside for Kuminga to do anything other than take this two year deal, he had no path to win by taking the QO no matter how well he played.

If I were GS, I'd have probably played even more hardball and lowered this offer to something where there was some tiny wiggle room to win on the QO, but very small, say 2/42M so that I had more flexibility under the apron this year. Even that would have been a really good deal under the circumstances as Kuminga would need over 34.1M the following year to break even (highly unlikely).

Ultimately, I think GS took the 0 risk path by offering him the deal that Kuminga would simply be hurting himself significantly if he turned it down with no path to come out ahead and then called his bluff because they knew mathematically there was no way for him to come out ahead.


Yeah, it seems like GS's real concern was just making sure they did not sign Kuminga to a deal large enough to screw up their acquisition of Horford, given their financial constraints. They didn't really have any wiggle room to go above this, and even this deal seems to be affecting the timing of when they can bring in Seth Curry.

I still think GS was nuts to turn down the deal that SAC was offering.
:clap:
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,780
And1: 18,859
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#252 » by dougthonus » Wed Oct 1, 2025 3:50 pm

sco wrote:I still think GS was nuts to turn down the deal that SAC was offering.


I generally agree. The Warriors must have just really not liked Malik Monk and viewed him as a negative asset, and I'd assume they looked around the league to see if they could swap Monk for something else they liked and could not. Kind of looking at Monk's productivity, I could see where they simply viewed him as a bad contract.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 21,033
And1: 15,435
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#253 » by kodo » Wed Oct 1, 2025 5:46 pm

sco wrote:I still think GS was nuts to turn down the deal that SAC was offering.


That would have been interesting, Kuminga is SAC. Interesting as in a one dimensional scorer is the last thing SAC needs another of.

The trade for Kuminga GS wanted, Josh Giddey, is always going to be the most interesting "what if" for these two.
Giddey in GS w/ Steph & Butler, vs
Kumina in CHI with Coby & Vuc.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,291
And1: 9,151
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#254 » by sco » Wed Oct 1, 2025 6:14 pm

kodo wrote:
sco wrote:I still think GS was nuts to turn down the deal that SAC was offering.


That would have been interesting, Kuminga is SAC. Interesting as in a one dimensional scorer is the last thing SAC needs another of.

The trade for Kuminga GS wanted, Josh Giddey, is always going to be the most interesting "what if" for these two.
Giddey in GS w/ Steph & Butler, vs
Kumina in CHI with Coby & Vuc.

Giddey may be flawed, but IMO he's a lot less flawed than Kuminga.

I see Kuminga as a worse, PF, version of Coby. A guy whose value is scoring, albeit not very efficiently, who isn't a good defender. IMO that's a problem because if he isn't your #1 option (which I don't see), he creates roster problems to compensate for his shortcomings.
:clap:
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 42,228
And1: 19,066
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#255 » by Red Larrivee » Wed Oct 1, 2025 6:23 pm

kodo wrote:
sco wrote:I still think GS was nuts to turn down the deal that SAC was offering.


That would have been interesting, Kuminga is SAC. Interesting as in a one dimensional scorer is the last thing SAC needs another of.

The trade for Kuminga GS wanted, Josh Giddey, is always going to be the most interesting "what if" for these two.
Giddey in GS w/ Steph & Butler, vs
Kumina in CHI with Coby & Vuc.


I honestly couldn't think of worse fits for either player than a double s&t.
meekrab
RealGM
Posts: 13,882
And1: 10,567
Joined: Dec 15, 2014

Re: Bulls re-sign Josh Giddey - 4/100- no options, fully guaranteed 

Post#256 » by meekrab » Wed Oct 1, 2025 11:16 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
kodo wrote:
sco wrote:I still think GS was nuts to turn down the deal that SAC was offering.


That would have been interesting, Kuminga is SAC. Interesting as in a one dimensional scorer is the last thing SAC needs another of.

The trade for Kuminga GS wanted, Josh Giddey, is always going to be the most interesting "what if" for these two.
Giddey in GS w/ Steph & Butler, vs
Kumina in CHI with Coby & Vuc.


I honestly couldn't think of worse fits for either player than a double s&t.

Also nearly impossible to make legal under the CBA thanks to how salary works in a S&T.

Return to Chicago Bulls