yosemiteben wrote:SWedd523 wrote:Can you go ahead and translate that for me
Melo don't like red lights when he's driving
To the lane or leaving the arena?
Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
yosemiteben wrote:SWedd523 wrote:Can you go ahead and translate that for me
Melo don't like red lights when he's driving
SWedd523 wrote:yosemiteben wrote:SWedd523 wrote:Can you go ahead and translate that for me
Melo don't like red lights when he's driving
To the lane or leaving the arena?
Snidely FC wrote:I am curious in these dog days and given the decent amount of negativity toward LaMelo on here, for those who think LaMelo either won’t be able to stay healthy or because of his personality can’t lead the team to the highest levels, and while the Chicago-Giddey stalemate is ongoing, would people rather have Josh Giddey and sanction some sort of Melo - Giddey trade?
If Giddy is being signed for 10 to 15 million dollars a year less than lamelo and there is another asset thrown in, it would be worth considering, especially with Giddy likely to miss far less time due to injury. I believe Giddy is also a couple years youngerChapelchilla wrote:Walt Cronkite wrote:I would prefer to keep LaMelo over Giddey. Without comparing numbers, feels like LaMelo has a much higher possible ceiling and I'd like to see how the additions to the roster positively impact his game. It is an interesting idea though and I could probably be talked into it without a lot of arm twisting if it seemed apparent that Giddey would always be available for more games than Ball going forward. Would be bummed to move LaMelo though.
It would need to be Melo for Giddey and other REAL assets for this to make sense for the Hornets. Picks and/or good players. If they sweetened the offer it could be worth exploring.
dmutombo321 wrote:Snidely FC wrote:I am curious in these dog days and given the decent amount of negativity toward LaMelo on here, for those who think LaMelo either won’t be able to stay healthy or because of his personality can’t lead the team to the highest levels, and while the Chicago-Giddey stalemate is ongoing, would people rather have Josh Giddey and sanction some sort of Melo - Giddey trade?If Giddy is being signed for 10 to 15 million dollars a year less than lamelo and there is another asset thrown in, it would be worth considering, especially with Giddy likely to miss far less time due to injury. I believe Giddy is also a couple years youngerChapelchilla wrote:Walt Cronkite wrote:I would prefer to keep LaMelo over Giddey. Without comparing numbers, feels like LaMelo has a much higher possible ceiling and I'd like to see how the additions to the roster positively impact his game. It is an interesting idea though and I could probably be talked into it without a lot of arm twisting if it seemed apparent that Giddey would always be available for more games than Ball going forward. Would be bummed to move LaMelo though.
It would need to be Melo for Giddey and other REAL assets for this to make sense for the Hornets. Picks and/or good players. If they sweetened the offer it could be worth exploring.
Sent from my motorola edge (2021) using RealGM mobile app
Chapelchilla wrote:From ESPN "key stats" today -
Charlotte Hornets: 35.9%
LaMelo Ball led the league with a 35.9% usage rate this past season, the 23rd-highest single-season mark ever. Typically, players with such heavy workloads are superstars putting up big numbers; 19 of the 22 players ahead of LaMelo made an All-NBA team in the season in question. (The exceptions are DeMarcus Cousins the year that he was traded from the Kings to the Pelicans, Jermaine O'Neal the year that he was suspended following the Malice at the Palace and Michael Jordan in his first Wizards season.)
But even if Ball had played enough games to qualify for All-NBA consideration, he wouldn't have come close. His PER was the worst for any player with a 35% usage rate in NBA history. Factor in his frequent injury absences, and it's unclear if Ball is still a franchise player the Hornets should build around, or rather a ball-dominant entertainer who doesn't win games.
Ouch, but the answer is up for debate.
SWedd523 wrote:Entering year six of his career. At some point we need to admit to ourselves that it's more "he is who he is" than "next year he'll put it all together"