What trade?
I'm happy with our present roster.
We've got some pretty good old boys!
Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
graymule
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,527
- And1: 1,528
- Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
What trade?
I'm happy with our present roster.
We've got some pretty good old boys!
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
atlantabbq99
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,285
- And1: 1,810
- Joined: Mar 28, 2013
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Why isn't Bol Bol on the Hawks? With Kristap and JJ injury prone, Hawks could use another back up post player
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 46,165
- And1: 17,479
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
-
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
If the Kings want to get rid of Zach Lavine, I do believe he'd be useful as a scorer off the bench.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 54,822
- And1: 10,740
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
No value for Sacremento.Jamaaliver wrote:If the Kings want to get rid of Zach Lavine, I do believe he'd be useful as a scorer off the bench.
How do we give Zach Lavine over 15 attempts per game?
Trae and Lavine on the court together would be a disaster. Both play no defense, but Zach can shoot, unlike Trae.
Zach Lavine has only had one winning season in 12 years.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
jayu70
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,742
- And1: 13,152
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
-
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Jamaaliver wrote:If the Kings want to get rid of Zach Lavine, I do believe he'd be useful as a scorer off the bench.
Doesn't this trade as is put the Hawks over the Luxury Tax? By $13+ million?