Mobley for JJJ: rare star for star edition
Moderators: Trader_Joe, BullyKing, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Andre Roberstan, loserX
Mobley for JJJ: rare star for star edition
-
esvl
- Starter
- Posts: 2,327
- And1: 674
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Mobley for JJJ: rare star for star edition
Grizzlies get an elite big who is a rim roller needed to play with Ja
Cavs get a similarly elite PF who can play next to Allen, who is an elite rim roller himself.
Cavs get a similarly elite PF who can play next to Allen, who is an elite rim roller himself.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
ReggiesKnicks
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,324
- And1: 2,822
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
Mobley is worth significantly more.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,542
- And1: 36,504
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
The Cavs aren't trading Mobley.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
- LarsV8
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,408
- And1: 5,880
- Joined: Dec 13, 2009
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
JJJ is a great player, but my theory is this niche of players, JJJ / BAM, the big man defensive specialist, with good but not great impact (fringe allstars) are going to hurt teams, if they end up getting overpaid.
I think the new CBA changes everything, and it is oh so critical to not overpay guys against their impact. I was okay with those two guys on their first extensions, but these second extension are just an absolute killer. The cost keeps rising, but the player growth tends to stop, and sometimes starts declining. This is a death knell.
20-22% of cap
vs
28-30% of cap
Is it safe to say Bane, a good player, was a casualty of this cap % spike by JJJ? Steven Adams maybe too.
Mobley is young, already more impactful than JJJ, and still has runway to improve. Don't think he is quite a 30% max caliber player, but you give him that money hoping he gets there, as he continues to grow.
As such, I have Mobley significantly more valuable, and he is in the unicorn zone of untouchable players.
I think the new CBA changes everything, and it is oh so critical to not overpay guys against their impact. I was okay with those two guys on their first extensions, but these second extension are just an absolute killer. The cost keeps rising, but the player growth tends to stop, and sometimes starts declining. This is a death knell.
20-22% of cap
vs
28-30% of cap
Is it safe to say Bane, a good player, was a casualty of this cap % spike by JJJ? Steven Adams maybe too.
Mobley is young, already more impactful than JJJ, and still has runway to improve. Don't think he is quite a 30% max caliber player, but you give him that money hoping he gets there, as he continues to grow.
As such, I have Mobley significantly more valuable, and he is in the unicorn zone of untouchable players.

Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons

- Posts: 51,607
- And1: 18,454
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
The rationale described by the OP makes the deal sound pointless for both teams since it pretty much describes the players as similar in their fit and general characteristics.
It does not explain why JJJ is better for the Cavs, or for that matter why Mobley is better for Memphis.
Mobley is to my mind much more valuable and the Cavs would never do this, but that’s almost irrelevant because the trade as presented doesn’t even try to make a case for itself.
Strange post.
It does not explain why JJJ is better for the Cavs, or for that matter why Mobley is better for Memphis.
Mobley is to my mind much more valuable and the Cavs would never do this, but that’s almost irrelevant because the trade as presented doesn’t even try to make a case for itself.
Strange post.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
QMemphis
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,093
- And1: 652
- Joined: May 22, 2018
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
Jaren is a better offensive player than Mobley. Mobley is slightly better on defense and is a much better rebounder. That being said Grizz are not trading Jaren.
We need his offense and he is our homegrown talent. Mobley is a great but is best as a center likely due to his 3pt shooting mainly but both are great cornerstone players. Grizz tried moving up to get Mobley but Houston wouldn’t budge.
We need his offense and he is our homegrown talent. Mobley is a great but is best as a center likely due to his 3pt shooting mainly but both are great cornerstone players. Grizz tried moving up to get Mobley but Houston wouldn’t budge.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
esvl
- Starter
- Posts: 2,327
- And1: 674
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
Snakebites wrote:The rationale described by the OP makes the deal sound pointless for both teams since it pretty much describes the players as similar in their fit and general characteristics.
It does not explain why JJJ is better for the Cavs, or for that matter why Mobley is better for Memphis.
Mobley is to my mind much more valuable and the Cavs would never do this, but that’s almost irrelevant because the trade as presented doesn’t even try to make a case for itself.
Strange post.
The rationale is that JJJ is a natural 4, while Mobley is more 5 than 4. Since the Cavs have a great natural 5 already in Allen, JJJ would make a better fit next to him. Redundancy fixed.
The Grizzlies don’t have a star caliber 5, who is a rim runner, to play alongside Ja, since JJJ cannot play PNRs and Edey is a big question mark.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,542
- And1: 36,504
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
esvl wrote:Snakebites wrote:The rationale described by the OP makes the deal sound pointless for both teams since it pretty much describes the players as similar in their fit and general characteristics.
It does not explain why JJJ is better for the Cavs, or for that matter why Mobley is better for Memphis.
Mobley is to my mind much more valuable and the Cavs would never do this, but that’s almost irrelevant because the trade as presented doesn’t even try to make a case for itself.
Strange post.
The rationale is that JJJ is a natural 4, while Mobley is more 5 than 4. Since the Cavs have a great natural 5 already in Allen, JJJ would make a better fit next to him. Redundancy fixed.
The Grizzlies don’t have a star caliber 5, who is a rim runner, to play alongside Ja, since JJJ cannot play PNRs and Edey is a big question mark.
The Cavs F.O. views Mobley as the present and future of the franchise. He won DPOY while averaging 18.5 ppg (on 12.8 fga) and 9.3 rpg at 24 years of age. They believe he'll be even better offensively next season. There is nothing the Grizzlies could offer that could make a Mobley trade happen.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,972
- And1: 2,590
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
jbk1234 wrote:esvl wrote:Snakebites wrote:The rationale described by the OP makes the deal sound pointless for both teams since it pretty much describes the players as similar in their fit and general characteristics.
It does not explain why JJJ is better for the Cavs, or for that matter why Mobley is better for Memphis.
Mobley is to my mind much more valuable and the Cavs would never do this, but that’s almost irrelevant because the trade as presented doesn’t even try to make a case for itself.
Strange post.
The rationale is that JJJ is a natural 4, while Mobley is more 5 than 4. Since the Cavs have a great natural 5 already in Allen, JJJ would make a better fit next to him. Redundancy fixed.
The Grizzlies don’t have a star caliber 5, who is a rim runner, to play alongside Ja, since JJJ cannot play PNRs and Edey is a big question mark.
The Cavs F.O. views Mobley as the present and future of the franchise. He won DPOY while averaging 18.5 ppg (on 12.8 fga) and 9.3 rpg at 24 years of age. They believe he'll be even better offensively next season. There is nothing the Grizzlies could offer that could make a Mobley trade happen.
I also don't agree that Mobley is more of a 5 than a 4. His floor game is improving, as is his shooting from behind the arc. I expect Mobley to mimic Duncan, manning the 4 for the first half of his career before transitioning to the 5 for the second half.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
toooskies
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,282
- And1: 2,591
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
mcfly1204 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:esvl wrote:The rationale is that JJJ is a natural 4, while Mobley is more 5 than 4. Since the Cavs have a great natural 5 already in Allen, JJJ would make a better fit next to him. Redundancy fixed.
The Grizzlies don’t have a star caliber 5, who is a rim runner, to play alongside Ja, since JJJ cannot play PNRs and Edey is a big question mark.
The Cavs F.O. views Mobley as the present and future of the franchise. He won DPOY while averaging 18.5 ppg (on 12.8 fga) and 9.3 rpg at 24 years of age. They believe he'll be even better offensively next season. There is nothing the Grizzlies could offer that could make a Mobley trade happen.
I also don't agree that Mobley is more of a 5 than a 4. His floor game is improving, as is his shooting from behind the arc. I expect Mobley to mimic Duncan, manning the 4 for the first half of his career before transitioning to the 5 for the second half.
Yep. Mobley is still pretty skinny, well under 240 even after years of the weight room. Most Cs are 250+.
His offensive game depends on contact, a little bit of bully-ball, which works much better for his weight against 4s than 5s.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
jayjaysee
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 21,273
- And1: 8,093
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
If/when Cleveland decides Allen/Mobley don’t work, you trade Allen.
I do like the idea of Allen/JJJ.. But just shouldn’t move Mobley.
I do like the idea of Allen/JJJ.. But just shouldn’t move Mobley.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
esvl
- Starter
- Posts: 2,327
- And1: 674
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
jayjaysee wrote:If/when Cleveland decides Allen/Mobley don’t work, you trade Allen.
I do like the idea of Allen/JJJ.. But just shouldn’t move Mobley.
I concur. Memphis should start with JJJ + Wells + 1st 2030 just to show they are serious.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,972
- And1: 2,590
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
esvl wrote:jayjaysee wrote:If/when Cleveland decides Allen/Mobley don’t work, you trade Allen.
I do like the idea of Allen/JJJ.. But just shouldn’t move Mobley.
I concur. Memphis should start with JJJ + Wells + 1st 2030 just to show they are serious.
I think you're missing the point. Memphis should go after Allen, they're not getting Mobley.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
esvl
- Starter
- Posts: 2,327
- And1: 674
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
mcfly1204 wrote:esvl wrote:jayjaysee wrote:If/when Cleveland decides Allen/Mobley don’t work, you trade Allen.
I do like the idea of Allen/JJJ.. But just shouldn’t move Mobley.
I concur. Memphis should start with JJJ + Wells + 1st 2030 just to show they are serious.
I think you're missing the point. Memphis should go after Allen, they're not getting Mobley.
I missed nothing - I opened a corresponding Allen thread last season. He remains my target, but not at the cost of JJJ, of course.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards

- Posts: 70,646
- And1: 23,139
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
They are similar players. Both are tweener-ish PF/C's who play elite defense but sometimes struggle against burlier centers.
The big difference is that Mobley is 2 years younger and still on the upward progression of his career while JJJ is probably more or less at his peak. Also, Mobley is a notably better rebounder.
Mobley is clearly more valuable than JJJ so there's no point in Cleveland doing this.
The big difference is that Mobley is 2 years younger and still on the upward progression of his career while JJJ is probably more or less at his peak. Also, Mobley is a notably better rebounder.
Mobley is clearly more valuable than JJJ so there's no point in Cleveland doing this.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
JRoy
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,037
- And1: 14,401
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
QMemphis wrote:Jaren is a better offensive player than Mobley. Mobley is slightly better on defense and is a much better rebounder. That being said Grizz are not trading Jaren.
We need his offense and he is our homegrown talent. Mobley is a great but is best as a center likely due to his 3pt shooting mainly but both are great cornerstone players. Grizz tried moving up to get Mobley but Houston wouldn’t budge.
Jaren is also frequently injured.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,542
- And1: 36,504
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
JRoy wrote:QMemphis wrote:Jaren is a better offensive player than Mobley. Mobley is slightly better on defense and is a much better rebounder. That being said Grizz are not trading Jaren.
We need his offense and he is our homegrown talent. Mobley is a great but is best as a center likely due to his 3pt shooting mainly but both are great cornerstone players. Grizz tried moving up to get Mobley but Houston wouldn’t budge.
Jaren is also frequently injured.
And on a contract that doesn't reflect the fact that he's frequently injured. He's talented, and will likely have good trade value, but if he's moved it will be to a team that's looking to achieve escape velocity from a rebuild rather than a contender over the second apron.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
One_and_Done
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,797
- And1: 5,788
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
I don't see either team doing it, though Cleveland should consider it more seriously.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
esvl
- Starter
- Posts: 2,327
- And1: 674
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
jbk1234 wrote:JRoy wrote:QMemphis wrote:Jaren is a better offensive player than Mobley. Mobley is slightly better on defense and is a much better rebounder. That being said Grizz are not trading Jaren.
We need his offense and he is our homegrown talent. Mobley is a great but is best as a center likely due to his 3pt shooting mainly but both are great cornerstone players. Grizz tried moving up to get Mobley but Houston wouldn’t budge.
Jaren is also frequently injured.
And on a contract that doesn't reflect the fact that he's frequently injured. He's talented, and will likely have good trade value, but if he's moved it will be to a team that's looking to achieve escape velocity from a rebuild rather than a contender over the second apron.
Is either Hali or Tatum frequently injured? Just curious what is the standard.
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
-
JRoy
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,037
- And1: 14,401
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: rare star for star edition: Mobley for JJJ
esvl wrote:jbk1234 wrote:JRoy wrote:
Jaren is also frequently injured.
And on a contract that doesn't reflect the fact that he's frequently injured. He's talented, and will likely have good trade value, but if he's moved it will be to a team that's looking to achieve escape velocity from a rebuild rather than a contender over the second apron.
Is either Hali or Tatum frequently injured? Just curious what is the standard.
Neither of those guys is in this deal. It looks like JJJr plays about 10 fewer games per season than Mobley.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Return to Trades and Transactions


