Post#380 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Oct 5, 2025 1:55 pm
I'll ease up on Dadiet a bit.
He's a project. He was the youngest player drafted a year ago, I think.
He was always a guy who was 3 years away minimum from the day he was drafted maybe even 4.
Kolek they took a swing on. I'm not even 100% sure he hasn't improved from last year. Summer league wasn't a good look but MAYBE he was trying to adjust to the new system. In some ways he looks a little stronger and looks like he can take some more contact on drives, in other ways we don't see the shot falling just yet and defense will probably always be an issue.
Then again, Deuce didn't look good for two years and then he did. Might be the case for Dadiet or even Kolek.
I was giving McCullar(s) a hard time but he's flashed. He seems "ok".
McCullar will be in Westchester again. Same with Diawara even if he gets that rookie deal that is the last thing the Knicks can afford.
I don't think it's a bad thing the Knicks have some youth in the pipeline they are trying to develop:
Huk
Diawara
McCullar(s)
Dadiet
Kolek
Kolek seems like the obvious piece to move if a team was interested because the Knicks are looking to carry at least 4 PG style players: Brunson, Brogdon, Clarkson, Deuce. Sure, Deuce and Clarkson kind of combo SG, but still.
Health concerns aside, Brogdon fits more what the Knicks need, another reliable initiator, creator, can score some type of player for the 2nd unit.
I get that Shamet is a good and willing defender, not sure it's worth losing Dadiet for that but I'll trust the Knicks FO if they think they can move on from Dadiet.
Height aside, if you think in terms of developmental wings, Knicks have Dadiet, Diawara and McCullar(s)
They could deal Dadiet and still have some youth depth, if having Shamet is that important to them.
I guess the run of injuries the Knicks have had in the playoffs - everyone two years ago, Hart being reduced against Indiana, have the FO determined to not run into that again and they want both Brogdon AND Shamet.
