The KnicksFix wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:The KnicksFix wrote:
Cause we not gutting the team for him
You want a team of Mitch and Giannis on the floor at the same time ??
Nah
You’re not being realistic at all if you think Milwaukee would even consider doing that trade

that wouldn’t even go through in nba 2k
Why would Mitch be on the court at the same time if Giannis is playing c?
Ok theoretically say we move KAT for giannis
And we move Mitch to backup
So who then rounds out the starting 5, with a lineup of jb, Mikal, Og, giannis… and who?
I doubt we do that. The whole point would be to pair KAT with Greek Freak for the lethal inside outside big combo. We don't
need this trade to happen...and this is why I think it could eventually happen. With with Giannis finally naming us we have a bit of leverage , but probably need more to get the deal that works for us.
But given enough time, with enough winning from us combined with losing from the Bucks that leverage increases....Gianis has to continue to be willing to be the bad guy and not waiver...
For Giannis to retain value the Bucks have to win ....and his load will be HUGE this season...can he carry it without getting hurt? And if he does get hurt what does that do to his value? This will be a war of attrition that favors us since we are already contenders.
IMO if a deal ultimately happens it has to be for only one starter - either OG or Mikal - and bench pieces. Giving up any combo of 2 starters makes us worse with Giannis not better...