MrSparkle wrote:Red Larrivee wrote:MrSparkle wrote:
Kinda. Come combine, he was a known commodity, though.
People knew about him and he still wasn't a firm first rounder or believed to have clear all-star potential. Find the number of times anyone talked about him at length in the draft threads.
Him becoming a superstar would not mean the Bulls evaluated the draft poorly. It's not like he was some clear franchise player and they took a mid talent instead.
There was hesitation to mock him high since he popped up out of nowhere... But I don’t think it’s all that comparable to a Jokic. International scouting has improved since 10Y ago (and it will continue to evolve), and I think the old/known draft beat writers are probably falling behind the times. Esp. ESPN, whose draft night ratings are proving to be a joke besides the most obvious choices (A+ for Flagg).
Yang wasn’t picked during a Taco Bell commercial. He was on boards; some people had him mocked in the first, even top-15.
NBA execs know that international prospects are better than ever. Their fault if they let pre-conceived notions dismiss options from their selection. I’m just saying- more and more, it looks like AK didn’t find Jokic. Jokic found AK. His draft vision hasn’t been good. And if Yang turns out to be the real deal, I certainly will hold it against him as it won’t be an isolated mistake of picking the lesser talent in a smaller pool of options. It won’t be my last straw with AK… but, it will be another slip in a dozen.
Hansen Yang:
ESPN: 36
Yahoo: 36
The Athletic: 36
No Ceilings: 36
Bleacher Report: 39
Net Scouts: 40
The Ringer: 2nd Round
SB Nation: 2nd Round
USA Today: 36
He was a consensus 2nd round pick and Portland picked him at 16. It was one of the most surprising picks of the night. Hey, maybe Portland ends up being right. But, let's not sit here and act like he was a solid 1st round pick and everyone was asleep at the wheel. If AK would've taken Yang at the Bulls pick, this board would've revolted. Be for real.
There are still plenty of international prospects who are busts. Remember when people were losing their minds over Poku and swore up and down he was going to be a unicorn? Killian Hayes? Sekou Doumbouya? Yang's archetype does not have a likely history of success, and it's not like he's played against strong competition either.
Do GMs and executives get paid good money to predict the future? Yes. But, even with hours, days, months and years of preparation, there is a **** ton of luck involved in it, especially when it comes to the draft. Just because someone drafted Jokic, doesn't mean they're going to find the next Jokic or even be good at drafting other prospects.
AK is bad at the draft, but if Yang becomes a superstar I'm not going to use it against him. **** happens.