monopoman wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Wizenheimer wrote:* I never bought into the Yang hype. And I'm not impressed with the Blazers using two straight lottery picks on slow-footed 7' C's. They can't play together, and there's not enough minutes for two drop-coverage C's n the modern NBA. It won't matter much when they are both on rookie scale deals. But IMO the Blazers will have to make a choice when they graduate to 2nd contracts and I can't see Yang ever being as good as Clingan. That said, I think he'll be better than he was last night.
So, I don't disagree with the final assessment. But...
If Clingan is a 28 min per game guy and and Yang is a 20 minute per game guy - you have your C rotation down for a few years. That isn't a bad thing.
I also noticed that Clingan was moving really well until the ankle thing. I am not sure I will concede Clingan as "slow footed" at this point. Is he going to go out and pickup fast PGs - no. But he is a solid defensive anchor.
My expectation was that Yang wouldn't be this far along at this point - so, maybe a different perspective.
Clingan might not be the fastest but he was part of the team massively improving on paint defense, he was one of the best at protecting the rim last year and that's despite being not the most agile. He has a great BB IQ and that's just evident watching him play, I believe he was easily the best pick at that point.
Yep, spot on. My only point was he was moving much better than last year - I think that is only going to improve.
















