NBA Sheady wrote:GLF wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:This really is not true at all.
IQ is a great spot up shooter and does a lot of damage off the catch.
RJ's most productive run of his career was late 2024 when he was relegated to playing off people, and creating nothing for himself.
Yak is 100% a guy who doesn't need the ball
That leaves Ingram and Barnes, and lets be honest, Barnes is not a good on-ball or off-ball player. He needs to learn to be a good off-ball guy though, as it is clear he is not a good enough scorer or decision maker to have the ball in his hands often.
Exactly. This talking point people have of our guys all needing the ball in their hands to be successful just isn’t true. Most of our guys are better off ball and when they’re forced to initiate that’s when they aren’t as good. BI is the only player in that starting lineup who is good with the ball in their hands initiating, everyone else is better off ball and when an advantage is already created for them. They’re better as secondary or tertiary ball handlers. Also if BI and RJ keep shooting the 3 like this all season and IQ shoots like we know he can, the spacing will be just fine.
Es from Raps Republic made the comment about the 4 guys in the SL needing the ball. I appreciate you guys "debunking" that take.
I think a lot of people see USG rate as if that player is Carmelo Anthony. USG rate is kinda a lazy prognosticating stat. It doesn't tell you how those possessions come about. I think average seconds/touch or average dribbles/touch give a better picture of that, because it's kinda what's in the way of ballmovement.
Another good one is just look at the frequency of possessions that take 7+ dribbles. IQ led the team last year with 18.7%. The high usage, high volume creators are like 35% and above.
And then look at touch time >6 seconds. 13% of RJ's possessions were greater than 6 seconds. There's very few 20ppg guys that are that low.
One ball becomes an issue when guys are stopping it, or when guys are taking bad shots to get their numbers. The latter can happen here, but if that happens the team's problem is buy in and chemistry. It's not ability.