Official Brandon Ingram Thread

[Harcore Fenton Mun]

Nice troll attempt.

No, really. It's a place he's never been. You can't use it for arguments sake.

Stupid is as stupid writes.

It's called fudging numbers.

He gives 100% for 33minutes, then we add Per36...now he's at 113% Magic!

[nikster]

No, really. It's a place he's never been. You can't use it for arguments sake.

Stupid is as stupid writes.

It's called fudging numbers.

He gives 100% for 33minutes, then we add Per36...now he's at 113% Magic!

You really cant see why people have an issue with you saying "20 ppg won't be enough" when your pulling that number from shortened pre season minutes?

[nikster]

No, really. It's a place he's never been. You can't use it for arguments sake.

Stupid is as stupid writes.

It's called fudging numbers.

He gives 100% for 33minutes, then we add Per36...now he's at 113% Magic!

You really cant see why people have an issue with you saying "20 ppg won't be enough" when your pulling that number from shortened pre season minutes?

[Harcore Fenton Mun]

Stupid is as stupid writes.

It's called fudging numbers.

He gives 100% for 33minutes, then we add Per36...now he's at 113% Magic!

You really cant see why people have an issue with you saying "20 ppg won't be enough" when your pulling that number from shortened pre season minutes?

Why not use career averages?

[nikster]

It's called fudging numbers.

He gives 100% for 33minutes, then we add Per36...now he's at 113% Magic!

You really cant see why people have an issue with you saying "20 ppg won't be enough" when your pulling that number from shortened pre season minutes?

Why not use career averages?

Why not use the last 6 years where he averages 23 ppg?

[Blazing_royale]

Man It feels good to have a first option on the team that can create their own offense. It's refreshing to see.