jokeboy86 wrote:-Trailblazers blowing a 15 pt 4th qtr lead in the WCF
This is also a great answer. Had to be so awful for Blazer fans.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

jokeboy86 wrote:-Trailblazers blowing a 15 pt 4th qtr lead in the WCF

KGtabake wrote:Haliburton's torn ACL on the game 7 of the Finals.

SlimShady83 wrote:Iwasawitness wrote:Haven't been banned once. You're acting irrational for no reason.
GOODBYE
Handlez wrote:Cooper is being guarded like it's the NBA finals game 7.
Everyone else faced with far less tenacity.
Same thing that's happening to Caitlin Clark.
SlimShady83 wrote:Iwasawitness wrote:SlimShady83 wrote:
So what if it just happened, again it's a basketball forum
Go whine somewhere else. We don't care what you think this forum is for. It's called "OT" for a reason.
Cool ok buddy have fun, wait haven't you been banned b4, ok cool have fun.
Edit: put me on your ignore list, because i have no further interaction with you, don't care what you have to say any further and i've never really done no harm to you in anyway of your posts, so goodbye.
Mr Puddles wrote:Netherlands played Italy in the semi-finals of the Euro Cup, held in the Netherlands.
The Dutch had an absolutely stacked team, were crushing the competition having won each match leading up to the game while holding a 13-3 goal scoring advantage throughout those matches.
During the semifinals match, the Netherlands dominated possession and created 8 times as many shots on goal and +17 total shots. Italy conceded two penalties during regulation, both of which the Netherlands missed, and Italy had to play with 10 men for most of the game due to a red card after about half an hour of play. Italy's first shot on goal came 80 minutes into the match.
In the end, following a 0-0 draw in regulation and overtime, Italy won through a penalty shootout, extending the penalty curse of the Dutch squad which had been kicked out of 7 of the last 9 tournaments in penalty shoot outs.
;pp=ygUbbmV0aGVybGFuZHMgaXRhbHkgZXVybyAyMDAw

Doctor MJ wrote:infinite11285 wrote:
This was my first thought actually. I was a kid who had chosen to support Michigan because of their football helmet and was cheering the Fab Five on with my heart and soul, and I just couldn't believe it.
In the RealGM era, probably the most brutal one to me was the 2007 Suns-Spurs series where Spur Horry committed an egregious foul on Nash, and when Nash's teammates reacted in the moments like human beings, it ran afoul of a ridiculous rule, and NBA leadership chose to literally enforce that rule, essentially handing the series - and the eventual championship - to the Spurs. This would then result in NBA people convincing Suns ownership to give up on pace & space while those of us analytically inclined already knew it wasn't a gimmick but the way forward for NBA offensive strategy.
In the years since, in all similar situations, the NBA has made the opposite call despite not actually changing the rule, further illustrating that the 2007 playoffs were determined by a blip of reasoning more concerned with not having to admit they made a bad rule than ensuring the best basketball.
Lakers824 wrote:The Warriors going scoreless the last 6 minutes to lose game 7 in 2016 was brutal. So close total the title, and they wet the bed.
The Rockets missing 27 consecutive threes in game 7 to lose a 3-2 lead is a good call.
The Lakers losing the deciding game against Houston in 81 with Magic perplexingly doing that shot/pass airball was awful.
Orlando losing game 1 of the 1995 finals by somehow missing 4 consecutive free throws is comically bad.
Utah losing game 6 in 1998 after leading most of the way and having a 3 point lead with seconds to go against a drained Jordan and an injured pippen, sick ron Harper, washed and distracted Rodman was....crazy. if they had held on, they would have been in the commanding seat for game 7.
Spurs losing game 7 in 2013 against Miami with Duncan missing a 3 foot bunny that he's made 10 thousand times was crazy. Duncan looked distraught.
dhsilv2 wrote:KGtabake wrote:Haliburton's torn ACL on the game 7 of the Finals.
Honestly, I'd rather lose by failing in a huge way than get hurt like that. 100% agree here.
Rust_Cohle wrote:Lakers824 wrote:The Warriors going scoreless the last 6 minutes to lose game 7 in 2016 was brutal. So close total the title, and they wet the bed.
The Rockets missing 27 consecutive threes in game 7 to lose a 3-2 lead is a good call.
The Lakers losing the deciding game against Houston in 81 with Magic perplexingly doing that shot/pass airball was awful.
Orlando losing game 1 of the 1995 finals by somehow missing 4 consecutive free throws is comically bad.
Utah losing game 6 in 1998 after leading most of the way and having a 3 point lead with seconds to go against a drained Jordan and an injured pippen, sick ron Harper, washed and distracted Rodman was....crazy. if they had held on, they would have been in the commanding seat for game 7.
Spurs losing game 7 in 2013 against Miami with Duncan missing a 3 foot bunny that he's made 10 thousand times was crazy. Duncan looked distraught.
Game 6 of 2013 sucked as a spurs fan, but losing game 7 always felt inevitable. We sagged off lebron way too much in game 7 and Danny green came crashing down to earth games 5-7. Battier went god mode going 6-8 from downtown in that game 7.
Thank god for cathartic 2014.

Rust_Cohle wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:infinite11285 wrote:
This was my first thought actually. I was a kid who had chosen to support Michigan because of their football helmet and was cheering the Fab Five on with my heart and soul, and I just couldn't believe it.
In the RealGM era, probably the most brutal one to me was the 2007 Suns-Spurs series where Spur Horry committed an egregious foul on Nash, and when Nash's teammates reacted in the moments like human beings, it ran afoul of a ridiculous rule, and NBA leadership chose to literally enforce that rule, essentially handing the series - and the eventual championship - to the Spurs. This would then result in NBA people convincing Suns ownership to give up on pace & space while those of us analytically inclined already knew it wasn't a gimmick but the way forward for NBA offensive strategy.
In the years since, in all similar situations, the NBA has made the opposite call despite not actually changing the rule, further illustrating that the 2007 playoffs were determined by a blip of reasoning more concerned with not having to admit they made a bad rule than ensuring the best basketball.
While it was unfortunate about the suspensions, even Nash’s teammates admitted Nash flipped on the play making it far worse than it needed to be. Horry’s play was dirty no doubt, but nash flinging himself into the first row made it much worse.
Suns had a chance to force game 6, but got wrecked. Spurs always had their number. I do agree it was a lame way for that series to go, but nash didn’t need to flop as hard as he done on a bad play.
https://www.abc15.com/sports/sports-blogs-local/did-suns-guard-steve-nash-embellish-robert-horry-s-infamous-hip-check-that-led-to-suspensions-
Doctor MJ wrote:Rust_Cohle wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:
This was my first thought actually. I was a kid who had chosen to support Michigan because of their football helmet and was cheering the Fab Five on with my heart and soul, and I just couldn't believe it.
In the RealGM era, probably the most brutal one to me was the 2007 Suns-Spurs series where Spur Horry committed an egregious foul on Nash, and when Nash's teammates reacted in the moments like human beings, it ran afoul of a ridiculous rule, and NBA leadership chose to literally enforce that rule, essentially handing the series - and the eventual championship - to the Spurs. This would then result in NBA people convincing Suns ownership to give up on pace & space while those of us analytically inclined already knew it wasn't a gimmick but the way forward for NBA offensive strategy.
In the years since, in all similar situations, the NBA has made the opposite call despite not actually changing the rule, further illustrating that the 2007 playoffs were determined by a blip of reasoning more concerned with not having to admit they made a bad rule than ensuring the best basketball.
While it was unfortunate about the suspensions, even Nash’s teammates admitted Nash flipped on the play making it far worse than it needed to be. Horry’s play was dirty no doubt, but nash flinging himself into the first row made it much worse.
Suns had a chance to force game 6, but got wrecked. Spurs always had their number. I do agree it was a lame way for that series to go, but nash didn’t need to flop as hard as he done on a bad play.
https://www.abc15.com/sports/sports-blogs-local/did-suns-guard-steve-nash-embellish-robert-horry-s-infamous-hip-check-that-led-to-suspensions-
None of this changes the fact that the rule wasn't something that realistically factored in what humans do when a they see something violent happens on the court, and the NBA after this one time stopped following it without taking it off the books.
Re: had a chance to force Game 6, but got wrecked. I think you mean they had a chance to go up 3-2 in Game 5 without their two players, but couldn't quite do it despite burning their nitro on the game because they knew that this was their home game, and Game 6 would be on the road.
Re: Spurs always had their number. I mean, that's what people were saying going into the 2010 series where the Suns swept the Spurs. For some reason, people tend to forget about this when they look to make a simple narrative about the matchup.
