MoneyBall wrote:Um, no. I did not bring up preseason stats with you, nor was it used as an argument for its validity. I responded to those who DO take those stats seriously (people like you, apparently).YogurtProducer wrote:MoneyBall wrote:I've got good news for you: he's actually better than those preseason averages. The most annoying part is you and everyone else know it. And yet we still get these "I get that preseason numbers don't matter, but look how bad his preseason numbers are" takes.
You brought up his good preseason game first my guy![]()
The sad part is we played 6 preseason games and there is only 1 you can point to that was good for Barnes. It isn’t like he’s been an incredible player for years and these are blips. He has had so many stretches of his career where he looks disinterested and looks like **** for games at a time, then has 1 huge game to make people forget about it.
But this is who Scottie has been for his entire career. A completely inconsistent player who can give you 31/6/4 one nightand a 1/11 shooting performance the next. This isn’t new
You literally said, within the same sentence, preseason stats don't mean **** and also we should be concerned because of how bad Scottie's preseason stats are lol. I suggest you take your own advice and ignore it.
Scottie is our best player. This has been true for the third consecutive season. We know his floor, and it's quite good. Bad shooting performances tell me nothing about effort level. Inconsistent play from a young guy who's being tossed around on a team with an identity crisis: I'm shocked.
We were just in the lottery 2 seasons in a row (bottom 10 actually). And this is supposed to be some feather in Barnes’ cap in regard to being our best player? Doesn’t this tell you what happens with a team where Barnes is a team’s best player?
You guys are unrelenting homers. You can’t be objective about anything. Barnes has significant flaws that aren’t all related to “roster construction” or “tanking”. It’s crazy that you won’t hold him accountable for his lack of development.