Top 25 peaks of the 2001-25: #15-#16 Spots

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

Djoker
Starter
Posts: 2,324
And1: 2,054
Joined: Sep 12, 2015
 

Re: Top 25 peaks of the 2001-25: #15-#16 Spots 

Post#241 » by Djoker » Wed Oct 22, 2025 6:13 pm

lessthanjake wrote:
I think 1.04 PPP is a lot better than that. The PPP calculation is more comparable to offensive efficiency, rather than TS%, since it is taking turnovers into account too and is basically subtracting out offensive rebounds that occurred on those possessions. So you might say, okay but a 104 ORTG isn’t good either. However, we can’t really compare it to general offensive ratings, because those are being dragged up a lot by situations that aren’t analogous to the situations in which isolations occur. In particular, offensive ratings are dragged up a lot by the fact that transition and second-chance shot attempts (particularly putbacks) are really efficient. But those aren’t the situations that isolations happen in.

What efficiency on isolations should be compared to is points per play in half-court offense. We have that from cleaningtheglass. See for instance, here: https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/league/context?season=2017&seasontype=regseason&start=10/1/2017&end=10/15/2018#tab-offense_halfcourt_putbacks. At that link, you can see that the league average PPP in the half-court was 93.4 in the 2018 season. It was 94.2 in the 2018 playoffs. In 2019, it was 94.7 in the regular season and 93.9 in the playoffs. And, in 2020, it was 95.2 in the regular season and 98.3 in the playoffs. So yeah, peak Harden isolations were actually quite a lot more effective than average offense in half-court situations, including in the playoffs.

And, for reference, just perusing the regular-season numbers on this in the last several years, the league average is around 3-5 points higher in the last three seasons than it was before that, so that puts some context on Luka’s numbers that make it look less good.


I mean I'd imagine there aren't very many turnovers on iso possessions. :D

Plus both Luka and Harden are sort of methodical break you down kind of players. I've seen a stat (think NBArapm.com IIRC) that both guys are actually not good transition players. Maybe both guys' weakness is precisely not pushing the ball more and creating more transition opportunities rather than resorting to less efficient halfcourt offense. There's many angles to go dissecting this. Your analysis is quite good here and it's nice seeing the numbers all together.

I just favor Luka slightly over Harden. I feel like he's played better in key playoff games. Like I'd trust him more than Harden who just happened to have so many of his worst moments at bad times. It could just be noise given the small playoff samples of course so there is some uncertainty. I don't blame those who side with a more robust regular season resume of Harden.
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,924
And1: 1,901
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Top 25 peaks of the 2001-25: #15-#16 Spots 

Post#242 » by f4p » Wed Oct 22, 2025 6:27 pm

lessthanjake wrote:Just to pull my last two posts together a bit, here’s these guys’ PPP relative to league average half-court offense, along with the volume in parentheses. Note that, for the playoffs, I used the playoff average, rather than using what the specific opponents gave up in the RS, since I’d need to subscribe to CleaningTheGlass in order to get that info.

_____

Luka rPPP on Isolations

2025 RS: +8.2 (6.2 possessions per game)
2024 RS: +10.3 (7.3 possessions per game)
2023 RS: +12.6 (7.1 possessions per game)
2022 RS: +15.4 (6.3 possessions per game)
2021 RS: +8.1 (4.6 possessions per game)
2020 RS: +6.8 (4.3 possessions per game)

2025 PS: +9.3 (7.8 possessions per game)
2024 PS: +4.4 (6.0 possessions per game)
2023 PS: N/A
2022 PS: -5.4 (8.5 possessions per game)
2021 PS: +5.8 (8.3 possessions per game)
2020 PS: -6.3 (6.3 possessions per game)

Peak Harden rPPP on Isolations

2020 RS: +16.8 (14.1 possessions per game)
2019 RS: +15.3 (16.4 possessions per game)
2018 RS: +28.6 (10.0 possessions per game)

2020 PS: +9.7 (10.3 possessions per game)
2019 PS: +10.1 (15.0 possessions per game)
2018 PS: +5.8 (12.9 possessions per game)

_____

So yeah, Harden definitely looks a lot better in this regard. He does go down in his relative efficiency on isolations in the playoffs, but he still looks great (not to mention that some of him going down is surely that he had harder-than-average playoff opponents, and I’m only doing this relative to league average in the playoffs). Luka looks worse in both regular season and playoffs (with both noticeably lower efficiency and lower volume), and his playoff relative efficiency numbers actually are sometimes negative.

With peak Harden, I think his isolation plays were genuinely extremely effective half-court offense. Luka’s isolation plays are still effective in the regular season, but not to the same degree, and they’re a mixed bag in the playoffs. This is probably a significant reason why coaches had Harden isolate so much more. And, considering Harden’s higher effectiveness and significantly higher volume on these plays, I think this is just a way bigger weapon for peak Harden in a way that Luka just can’t compare to at all (and honestly, not sure anyone can—maybe a guy like Jordan if we go back far enough, but Harden is a massive outlier for guys we have this data for).

NOTE: One caveat I’d give on this is that I believe the PPP calculations for isolation plays aren’t taking into account points scored off of assists and whatnot. So the actual overall effectiveness of these plays is a bit a bit more complicated a question, since I believe this is just talking about how effective it is when they isolated and attempted to score (or turned the ball over).



and i haven't looked at luka's opponents but it's not like harden got lucky with his playoff opponents. he started 2018 with a bad defense in minnesota (#28), but then went

#28 minnesota
#1 regular season defense (utah)
#1 playoff defense by quite a bit (warriors)

then 2019
#2 defense (utah again)
the warriors again - mid regular season and postseason defense but arguably most of that is in the area of being switchable on guys like harden

2020
#10 okc - who upped lu dort's minutes despite him having something crazy like 30/13/44 shooting splits heading into game 7 (i.e. chucked their offense in the trash to try to stop harden)
#3 lakers - who spent the last 4 games constantly doubling harden beyond the 3 point line and leaving westbrook wide open

4 top 3 defenses in 7 rounds, another top 10 defense, plus whatever you think of the 2019 warriors. just to note, while we expect better defenses in the playoffs, a team like the 2020 lakers didn't face a top 10 defense in the whole playoffs so facing so many elite defenses isn't necessarily expected either.
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 3,111
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: Top 25 peaks of the 2001-25: #15-#16 Spots 

Post#243 » by lessthanjake » Wed Oct 22, 2025 6:29 pm

Djoker wrote:
lessthanjake wrote:
I think 1.04 PPP is a lot better than that. The PPP calculation is more comparable to offensive efficiency, rather than TS%, since it is taking turnovers into account too and is basically subtracting out offensive rebounds that occurred on those possessions. So you might say, okay but a 104 ORTG isn’t good either. However, we can’t really compare it to general offensive ratings, because those are being dragged up a lot by situations that aren’t analogous to the situations in which isolations occur. In particular, offensive ratings are dragged up a lot by the fact that transition and second-chance shot attempts (particularly putbacks) are really efficient. But those aren’t the situations that isolations happen in.

What efficiency on isolations should be compared to is points per play in half-court offense. We have that from cleaningtheglass. See for instance, here: https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/league/context?season=2017&seasontype=regseason&start=10/1/2017&end=10/15/2018#tab-offense_halfcourt_putbacks. At that link, you can see that the league average PPP in the half-court was 93.4 in the 2018 season. It was 94.2 in the 2018 playoffs. In 2019, it was 94.7 in the regular season and 93.9 in the playoffs. And, in 2020, it was 95.2 in the regular season and 98.3 in the playoffs. So yeah, peak Harden isolations were actually quite a lot more effective than average offense in half-court situations, including in the playoffs.

And, for reference, just perusing the regular-season numbers on this in the last several years, the league average is around 3-5 points higher in the last three seasons than it was before that, so that puts some context on Luka’s numbers that make it look less good.


I mean I'd imagine there aren't very many turnovers on iso possessions. :D

Plus both Luka and Harden are sort of methodical break you down kind of players. I've seen a stat (think NBArapm.com IIRC) that both guys are actually not good transition players. Maybe both guys' weakness is precisely not pushing the ball more and creating more transition opportunities rather than resorting to less efficient halfcourt offense. There's many angles to go dissecting this. Your analysis is quite good here and it's nice seeing the numbers all together.

I just favor Luka slightly over Harden. I feel like he's played better in key playoff games. Like I'd trust him more than Harden who just happened to have so many of his worst moments at bad times. It could just be noise given the small playoff samples of course so there is some uncertainty. I don't blame those who side with a more robust regular season resume of Harden.


Yeah, I’m not saying there aren’t reasons to favor Luka over Harden (though I myself do have Harden ahead). I just mean that I don’t really think it’s an example of two very similar players where one is simply an upgraded version that is basically as good or better at everything than the other guy. Like, this isn’t Jordan vs. Kobe. Harden definitely has a very significant advantage over Luka in at least one major area.

And yeah, I think it’s potentially a good point about the transition thing vs. isolation. If you’re getting into isolation instead of pushing the ball in transition, then that’s probably bad even if the isolation is efficient relative to half-court offense. That said, I don’t think the transition PPP on NBArapm is really getting at how well they push the ball. Rather, it’s basically looking at their scoring efficiency on transition shots while accounting for their transition turnovers (and subtracting any offensive rebounds on their misses from their transition FGA). It would make sense that these guys would rank pretty low in such a stat, because they’re going to be making a whole lot of their team’s passes in transition, which will give them a lot of turnovers and therefore lower their transition PPP. Basically, the more you’re the distributor instead of the scorer in transition, the lower your PPP would be. Which makes it not a great stat to assess transition play of PGs, IMO. My guess is that Magic Johnson would’ve ended up with a low transition PPP, for instance.

Finally, now that you mention NBArapm, I just noticed that they have their own version of rPPP for isolation. I think their numbers are probably PPP relative to league average for that play type, though, which I think is probably not the most useful thing for purposes of this particular discussion, since the opportunity cost isn’t necessarily a different person isolating but rather a different half-court play type entirely. All that said, a brief glance at their rPPP numbers (which you can find by going to the “Offense” tab on a player’s page) tells a similar story—just with slightly higher numbers, because PPP on isolation plays is evidently a bit lower than overall PPP in half-court offense.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,202
And1: 25,475
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Top 25 peaks of the 2001-25: #15-#16 Spots 

Post#244 » by 70sFan » Fri Oct 24, 2025 10:06 am

Unfortunately, I haven't found the time to vote and sorry for another delay...

Voting results

Votes:

Spoiler:

Code: Select all

        "trelos6": ["Steve Nash", "Manu Ginobili", "James Harden", "Anthony Davis"],
        "One_and_Done": ["Luka Doncic", "Steve Nash", "James Harden", "Jimmy Butler"],
        "Jaivl": ["Anthony Davis", "Steve Nash", "James Harden", "Tracy McGrady"],
        "lessthanjake": ["Steve Nash", "Manu Ginobili", "James Harden", "Draymond Green"],
        "Djoker": ["Anthony Davis", "Steve Nash", "Joel Embiid", "Luka Doncic"],
        "Cavsfansince84": ["Luka Doncic", "James Harden", "Steve Nash" , "Anthony Davis"],
        "homecourtloss": ["James Harden", "Steve Nash", "Draymond Green", "Joel Embiid"],
        "DraymondGold": ["Steve Nash", "James Harden", "Joel Embiid", "Anthony Davis"],
        "eminence": ["Jayson Tatum", "Draymond Green", "James Harden", "Steve Nash"],
        "ReggiesKnicks": ["Steve Nash", "James Harden", "Rudy Gobert", "Jayson Tatum"],
        "iggymcfrack": ["Manu Ginobili", "Draymond Green", "Russell Westbrook", "James Harden"],
        "Joao Saraiva": ["Dwight Howard", "Steve Nash", "Anthony Davis", " Allen Iverson"],
        "-Luke-": ["James Harden", "Steve Nash", "Anthony Davis", "Luka Doncic"],
        "TrueLAfan": ["Manu Ginobili", "Steve Nash", "James Harden", "Luka Doncic"],
        "Doctor MJ": ["Steve Nash", "Manu Ginobili", "Draymond Green", "James Harden"],


Number of voters: 15

Best Kemeny score:

Spoiler:
1. Steve Nash
2. James Harden
3. Anthony Davis
4. Manu Ginobili
5. Draymond Green
6. Luka Doncic
7. Joel Embiid
8. Jayson Tatum
9. Dwight Howard
10. Rudy Gobert
11. Russell Westbrook
12. Allen Iverson
13. Jimmy Butler
14. Tracy McGrady
Kemeny score: 392



Top 25 peaks of the 2001-25: #15-#16 Spots:

#15. 2004/05 Steve Nash

Image

#16. 2017/18 James Harden

Image

Return to Player Comparisons