Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Rubios
Junior
Posts: 301
And1: 185
Joined: Nov 24, 2024

Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#1 » by Rubios » Wed Oct 22, 2025 7:56 pm

Plz, don't get me wrong: I think he's a very good player.
But there's serious overlapping issues.

In fact, LeBron (at this stage), Luka and Reaves are essentially the same player. But both LBJ and Luka have the BB IQ to figure out how to complement each other. I guess.

Are they waiting for LeBron's contract to end and include Reeves in a big trade, maybe? Or a trade deadline operation leading to playoffs?
LeBronSpaghetti
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,443
And1: 2,345
Joined: Mar 08, 2018

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#2 » by LeBronSpaghetti » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:09 pm

Because they didn’t need a big anymore after they signed former number 1 pick Dominayton
Sixers in 4
Analyst
Posts: 3,329
And1: 2,724
Joined: Apr 22, 2022
         

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#3 » by Sixers in 4 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:10 pm

Because Lebron isn't going to be there beyond this year anyways
Shaka_Zulu
Starter
Posts: 2,122
And1: 2,900
Joined: Feb 11, 2018
   

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#4 » by Shaka_Zulu » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:12 pm

He is welcome in Wolves, we can hide his lack of defending with our personnel.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,852
And1: 14,202
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#5 » by JRoy » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:14 pm

Because no one would give them a superstar for expiring Reaves.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
BigGargamel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,258
And1: 11,014
Joined: Jan 28, 2020
Contact:
     

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#6 » by BigGargamel » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:41 pm

The rest of the league knows how mediocre Reaves really is. Is he that much better than an Aaron Wiggins? Sure, he gets a lot of minutes and thus counting stats, but the Lakers are woefully thin.

Considering what the Lakers front office used to say about bums like Talen Horton Tucker, they probably want an All Star in return, and that' just not going to happen. Reaves is nothing special.
MrGoat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,005
And1: 7,612
Joined: Aug 14, 2019
 

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#7 » by MrGoat » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:42 pm

LeBron won't be there forever, likely gone after this season unless he's willing to take a steep discount. And this is the Lakers we're talking about, it would take a king's ransom to get Reaves, and he's on a good contract
Free Luigi
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,642
And1: 13,965
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#8 » by Effigy » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:44 pm

Rubios wrote:In fact, LeBron (at this stage), Luka and Reeves are essentially the same player.


If the Lakers think this as well, then that's why he didn't get traded. Because no other team in the league thinks Reeves and Luka are 'essentially the same player'
Rubios
Junior
Posts: 301
And1: 185
Joined: Nov 24, 2024

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#9 » by Rubios » Wed Oct 22, 2025 8:52 pm

Effigy wrote:
Rubios wrote:In fact, LeBron (at this stage), Luka and Reeves are essentially the same player.


If the Lakers think this as well, then that's why he didn't get traded. Because no other team in the league thinks Reeves and Luka are 'essentially the same player'


I mean... the same style, way of playing. Not that they are on the same stratosphere.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,706
And1: 11,416
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#10 » by wco81 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 9:07 pm

Lakers are supposedly saving their cap space so they can sign a big star.

Reeves' cap number is just under $14 million and his player option for next season is $14.9 million. If he has another good scoring season, he's going to be looking for over $30-40 million AAV.

Lebron is on a $52.6 million expiring.

They also have Vincent, Rui and Kleber on expiring contracts of $11.5 million, $18.2 and $11 million. Also Hayes on a $3.5 million expiring.

So potentially they have $107-108 million in expiring contracts.

Can they combine some or all of these salaries to trade for Giannis or Jokic? Because who else are they going to spend potentially $107-108 million in salary space on next summer?

Are they going to give Reeves $35-40 million AAV extension?

Whom are they going to pay to replace LBJ's production?

The 2026 free agents aren't that impressive:

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,642
And1: 13,965
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#11 » by Effigy » Wed Oct 22, 2025 9:13 pm

wco81 wrote:Lakers are supposedly saving their cap space so they can sign a big star.

Reeves' cap number is just under $14 million and his player option for next season is $14.9 million. If he has another good scoring season, he's going to be looking for over $30-40 million AAV.

Lebron is on a $52.6 million expiring.

They also have Vincent, Rui and Kleber on expiring contracts of $11.5 million, $18.2 and $11 million. Also Hayes on a $3.5 million expiring.

So potentially they have $107-108 million in expiring contracts.

Can they combine some or all of these salaries to trade for Giannis or Jokic? Because who else are they going to spend potentially $107-108 million in salary space on next summer?

Are they going to give Reeves $35-40 million AAV extension?

Whom are they going to pay to replace LBJ's production?

The 2026 free agents aren't that impressive:

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents

They'll trade Reeves and a 2nd for Edwards.
User avatar
IAMZOOTED2
Analyst
Posts: 3,141
And1: 2,467
Joined: Mar 05, 2017
Location: Somewhere west of east and south of north
 

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#12 » by IAMZOOTED2 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 9:23 pm

How much better is Reaves over a average replacement? Not tremendous, but he is cheap(er) insurance and everybody likes Hillbilly Kobe in LA. So the vibes is high.
A single sharp pepper is better than a basketful of gourds.
lirikko
Ballboy
Posts: 47
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#13 » by lirikko » Wed Oct 22, 2025 10:00 pm

Reaves + Hachimura to Celtics
White to Lakers
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 54,362
And1: 10,551
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#14 » by HMFFL » Wed Oct 22, 2025 10:07 pm

It doesn't make sense to rush to trade Austin Reaves. The team payroll will have some flexibility after this season and if they move on from Lebron James. Deadweight makes $50m and some fans are concerned about the $14m Austin Reaves makes?
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,930
And1: 17,856
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#15 » by Mavrelous » Wed Oct 22, 2025 10:11 pm

Reaves is a good fit with Luka, Lula always played with a good ball handling guard excapt pre deadline 22/23.
Their problems are in the rest of thr roster, they needed with athletic defender, they have unathletic shooters with bad defense.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
dballislife
RealGM
Posts: 14,672
And1: 5,717
Joined: Jan 24, 2010

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#16 » by dballislife » Wed Oct 22, 2025 10:22 pm

but what can reaves and not much draft assets get you??
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,396
And1: 3,755
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#17 » by SkyHook » Wed Oct 22, 2025 10:43 pm

Effigy wrote:
wco81 wrote:Lakers are supposedly saving their cap space so they can sign a big star.

Reeves' cap number is just under $14 million and his player option for next season is $14.9 million. If he has another good scoring season, he's going to be looking for over $30-40 million AAV.

Lebron is on a $52.6 million expiring.

They also have Vincent, Rui and Kleber on expiring contracts of $11.5 million, $18.2 and $11 million. Also Hayes on a $3.5 million expiring.

So potentially they have $107-108 million in expiring contracts.

Can they combine some or all of these salaries to trade for Giannis or Jokic? Because who else are they going to spend potentially $107-108 million in salary space on next summer?

Are they going to give Reeves $35-40 million AAV extension?

Whom are they going to pay to replace LBJ's production?

The 2026 free agents aren't that impressive:

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents

They'll trade Reeves and a 2nd for Edwards.

This is just plain silly.
Spoiler:
Kessler Edwards is a free agent.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,706
And1: 11,416
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#18 » by wco81 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:16 pm

HMFFL wrote:It doesn't make sense to rush to trade Austin Reaves. The team payroll will have some flexibility after this season and if they move on from Lebron James. Deadweight makes $50m and some fans are concerned about the $14m Austin Reaves makes?



On the KOC podcast, they speculated that LBJ isn't happy about his contractual situation, where it appears the Lakers are going to move on from him after this season. He didn't practice much and he was disengaged during the game last night. So maybe this health condition which holds him out for 2-3 weeks is him showing that the Lakers still need him?

He was still All-NBA (second team) last season. His age and salary and the fact that Luka is now the face of the franchise makes him persona non grata with the Lakers.

But whom are they going to sign with all that cap space who's going to be an All-NBA player? Those are usually locked up by teams into super max contracts.

The only one who might potentially leave his current team is Giannis? But that won't be until the summer likely and by then, it may be too late to trade all these expiring contracts including LBJs.
Mephariel
Starter
Posts: 2,062
And1: 2,161
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
   

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#19 » by Mephariel » Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:25 pm

Because they need ball handlers and shot creators. Lebron's health is an issue. Reeves is the only other guy that can create shot and drive to the paint.
wegotthabeet
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,556
And1: 3,075
Joined: Jun 29, 2021
 

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#20 » by wegotthabeet » Thu Oct 23, 2025 1:00 am

Who wants to pay his next contract?

He needs a Josh Giddey Bulls type situation, where he gets to be the primary ball handler and expectations for the team are low.

Return to The General Board